“Why is Peyto’s decline rates higher than your peers (if that’s the case)?
Trevor followed, “I don’t think it is”
And JP responds, “I don’t think it is either so I don’t know how to answer that”
In short JP said… What the hell is he talking about? 3/x
JP then explains how Peyto has a 10 yr PDP reserve life index and concludes, “so I wouldn’t consider our decline rates higher.”
(For ref. - $TOU 6 yrs & $ARX 4 yrs PDP RLI)
He ends by says Peyto is also transparent, the decline rate is in the corporate presentation. 😂 4/x
Here is the slide in the $PEY.to corp deck.
Decline rate of 27% in 2024 and expected decline rate of 26-28% in 2025-2027 5/x
So how does this compare to other NG peers?
Here is the data from Peter’s & Co:
BIR = 25%
PEY = 27%
TOU = 33%
ARX = 35%
NVA = 40%
This is remarkable. Far from having a high decline rate, Peyto actually has a very low decline rate.
But that's not all, let’s continue 🫡 6/x
Mike Rose from In the Money Podcast, on the Montney:
“…you have to replace a third (33%) or your production every year”
And, “...the gas business with resource plays, it’s a treadmill and it’s a REALLY BIG TREADMILL and it GOES REALLY FAST.” (Added emphasis)
7/x
John Dielwart - Arc Resources on the Montney:
“…resource plays are great, but the average decline rate is HIGH”
“You could go and drill a bunch of Montney wells that decline 50-60% in the first year, but THE TREADMILL THAT YOUR ON spending capital to SUSTAIN the business" 8/x
John Dielwart continues…
“…an important part of our business strategy was not drilling the Montney so fast that it put on this treadmill of 35-40% first year declines” 😮 😮 😮
This might explain why so many are bullish OFS...😂 9/x
So Peyto doesn't have a high decline rate, unlike others.
High decline rate = High CAPEX
Low decline rate = Low CAPEX
So while some enjoy the treadmill, the $PEY.to camp prefers:
✅Lower declines
✅Profitable growth
✅High FCF
✅More dividends
Have a great weekend!
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Production was up from 133,000 boe/d last month hitting 141,000 boe/d in November and on the way to 145k boe/d in Dec.
But JP's commentary on the Bluesky was shocking, so let's dig in.
🧵1/x
When Peyto aquired Repsol they inherited a drilled but uncompleted Bluesky ERH.
"The well was so highly productive that it required a downhole chock to restrict its flow for 18 months due to facility constraints"
Sounds impressive right? 2/x
"After some careful planning, Peyto drilled two follow-up wells offsetting the initial well that have provided some initial impressive rates (Wells 2&3 in Figure 1)"
While all these wells look look impressive what comes next is the Peyto magic 😀 3/x
1) What anyone on X says about what a "high quality" business is. The numbers tell me it is or isn't a high quality business.
2) What the share price is doing. I want to evaluate what the business is worth, then check the stock price. 2/x
Reserves Analysis
Below is each companies last share price and most recent reserve valuation. PDP is the net present value of current production less debt divided by shares outstanding. 1P includes proven reserves they plan on drilling in the next several years.
If we apply $TOU valuation to $PEY and vice versa we'll see the relative valuation gap.
If $PEY.to had $TOU.to's PDP valuation it would sell for $28.89.
Likewise buying Peyto today is like buying TOU for $43.91 using PDP reserves.
Peyto will supply via a direct connection which means low transport and fuel costs. It also means significant emissions savings of around 25,000 tonnes of CO2e/yr. 2/x
The initial deal is for 60K GJ/d for 15 years. That's for Phase 1. The plan is for expansion to 120K GJ/d. Peyto will have the option to supply the expansion.
Cutbank Dawson Gas Resources (owned by Mitsubishi) is the other gas supplier. 3/x