Kevin Graham Profile picture
Dec 7 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
During this interview, Trevor graciously asked JP from $PEY.to a question about decline rates.

This is an important and telling thread for many reasons, including misinformation on X and the truth about resource plays.

Buckle up 🧵 1/x
Here's the question:

“Why is Peyto’s decline rates higher than your peers (if that’s the case)?

Trevor followed, “I don’t think it is”

And JP responds, “I don’t think it is either so I don’t know how to answer that”

In short JP said… What the hell is he talking about?
3/x Image
JP then explains how Peyto has a 10 yr PDP reserve life index and concludes, “so I wouldn’t consider our decline rates higher.”

(For ref. - $TOU 6 yrs & $ARX 4 yrs PDP RLI)

He ends by says Peyto is also transparent, the decline rate is in the corporate presentation. 😂
4/x Image
Here is the slide in the $PEY.to corp deck.

Decline rate of 27% in 2024 and expected decline rate of 26-28% in 2025-2027
5/x Image
So how does this compare to other NG peers?

Here is the data from Peter’s & Co:
BIR = 25%
PEY = 27%
TOU = 33%
ARX = 35%
NVA = 40%

This is remarkable. Far from having a high decline rate, Peyto actually has a very low decline rate.

But that's not all, let’s continue 🫡
6/x Image
Mike Rose from In the Money Podcast, on the Montney:

“…you have to replace a third (33%) or your production every year”

And, “...the gas business with resource plays, it’s a treadmill and it’s a REALLY BIG TREADMILL and it GOES REALLY FAST.” (Added emphasis)

7/x Image
John Dielwart - Arc Resources on the Montney:

“…resource plays are great, but the average decline rate is HIGH”

“You could go and drill a bunch of Montney wells that decline 50-60% in the first year, but THE TREADMILL THAT YOUR ON spending capital to SUSTAIN the business"
8/x Image
John Dielwart continues…

“…an important part of our business strategy was not drilling the Montney so fast that it put on this treadmill of 35-40% first year declines” 😮 😮 😮

This might explain why so many are bullish OFS...😂
9/x Image
So Peyto doesn't have a high decline rate, unlike others.

High decline rate = High CAPEX
Low decline rate = Low CAPEX

So while some enjoy the treadmill, the $PEY.to camp prefers:
✅Lower declines
✅Profitable growth
✅High FCF
✅More dividends

Have a great weekend!
/end Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Graham

Kevin Graham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_AGraham

Dec 6
December $PEY.to Monthly Report was another GEM

Production was up from 133,000 boe/d last month hitting 141,000 boe/d in November and on the way to 145k boe/d in Dec.

But JP's commentary on the Bluesky was shocking, so let's dig in.

🧵1/x Image
When Peyto aquired Repsol they inherited a drilled but uncompleted Bluesky ERH.

"The well was so highly productive that it required a downhole chock to restrict its flow for 18 months due to facility constraints"

Sounds impressive right?
2/x Image
"After some careful planning, Peyto drilled two follow-up wells offsetting the initial well that have provided some initial impressive rates (Wells 2&3 in Figure 1)"

While all these wells look look impressive what comes next is the Peyto magic 😀
3/x Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 23
What is the purpose of this post?

Is he deliberately trying to mislead people 🤥OR is he just ignorant? (Hard to say)

Let's explore how & why it's completely wrong.
🧵1/x Image
The first step of a proper analysis is to read the fine print and understand the assumptions.

-Only 3,972 are PUDs, PNP, or Probable BOOKED locations
-21,490 are UNBOOKED locations

UNBOOKED = "no certainty" that:
1) They will become a location &
2) If they are economic 👇
2/x Image
Let's take a look at $PEY.to

Yup, they have over 1600 BOOKED locations as per independent reserve evaluator GLJ.

There are no fictious locations in the Peyto deck.

So instead of posting an apples to apples comparison he posts an apples to oranges comparison. 3/x Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 27
This is a great question... what would make me prefer $TOU.to over $PEY.to?

This is likely going to be a large thread so let's dig into some numbers. 🧵
1/x
First two things I don't care about:

1) What anyone on X says about what a "high quality" business is. The numbers tell me it is or isn't a high quality business.

2) What the share price is doing. I want to evaluate what the business is worth, then check the stock price.
2/x Image
Reserves Analysis

Below is each companies last share price and most recent reserve valuation. PDP is the net present value of current production less debt divided by shares outstanding. 1P includes proven reserves they plan on drilling in the next several years.

If we apply $TOU valuation to $PEY and vice versa we'll see the relative valuation gap.

If $PEY.to had $TOU.to's PDP valuation it would sell for $28.89.

Likewise buying Peyto today is like buying TOU for $43.91 using PDP reserves.

The same numbers are shown for 1P reserves.
3/xImage
Read 10 tweets
Feb 19, 2024
$Pey.to 2023 reserves 🧵

Peyto always answers these 4 key questions every year.

Lets dive in 1/x Image
Breakdown of Repsol

-Most companies lump things together to hide terrible results. Peyto took the opposite approach.

-Organic capital program $413m added proved producing reserves at $6.90/boe. That is insane & probably best in the industry 2/x
Breakdown of Repsol (2)

-Peyto ended up paying $699m. If they just let the production blow down they would recover this cash back at an 8% discounted rate ($715m).

-All future drilling & the gas plants were free.😮
3/x Image
Read 15 tweets
Feb 4, 2024
Is “wet gas” better than “dry gas”?

If it triggers you that I would challenge this widely accepted view, please hold your criticism to the end.

We will compare two of the best $PEY & $TOU

An important 🧵 1/x
First, yes it is true that $TOU has more “liquids” than $PEY.

In FY 2022, $TOU had 22% liquids compared to $PEY at 13%. 2/x Image
In 2022 (a year with very high oil prices) WTI averaged $94.90/boe. AECO averaged $5.10/GJ in 2022.

Because hedging is a one time benefit, all analysis will be UNHEDGED.

Below is the breakdown from 2022, the last full year we have. 3/x
Read 8 tweets
Jan 28, 2023
$Pey.to will begin selling about 10% of their gas to Cascade Power later this year.

Netbacks will be huge. 🚀 🚀
🧵 1/x
Peyto will supply via a direct connection which means low transport and fuel costs. It also means significant emissions savings of around 25,000 tonnes of CO2e/yr. 2/x
The initial deal is for 60K GJ/d for 15 years. That's for Phase 1. The plan is for expansion to 120K GJ/d. Peyto will have the option to supply the expansion.

Cutbank Dawson Gas Resources (owned by Mitsubishi) is the other gas supplier. 3/x
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(