Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture
Dec 13 22 tweets 3 min read Read on X
COVID-19 is not just an acute event - it is a long-term vascular insult.
This study shows that the risk of ischemic stroke remains elevated for at least four years after SARS-CoV-2 infection.🧵
The risk remains elevated including in people who
were not hospitalized,
had a mild or moderate course,
had no obvious neurological complications during the acute phase.
This strongly suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with lasting structural or functional vascular injury to the vascular system, rather than causing only a transient pro thrombotic episode.
One of the most striking and counterintuitive findings is that -
transient cerebral ischemia (TCI/TIA) is more than twice as common in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, while no significant increase is observed in hospitalized patients.
This is difficult to explain by disease severity alone, but it makes biological sense.
Hospitalized patients may have received earlier antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory treatment, and close monitoring.
Non-hospitalized patients received none of these, still experienced endothelial and microvascular injury.
In this context, TCI likely reflects persistent dysfunction of cerebral perfusion and vascular reactivity, rather than classic large vessel occlusion.
Ischemic stroke reflects structural failure (thrombosis, embolism, sustained hypoperfusion).
TCI/TIA reflects functional failure (microthrombi, endothelial instability, impaired autoregulation).
The pattern observed here - stroke risk increased in all COVID positive groups, while TCI increases mainly in mild cases - suggests
SARS-CoV-2 increases baseline cerebrovascular vulnerability across the population,
but in many individuals this manifests as recurrent, subclinical ischemic events rather than overt stroke.
Although mechanistic pathways were not directly measured, the findings are consistent with persistent endothelial dysfunction, chronic low-grade hypercoagulability, disruption of the neurovascular unit, impaired blood brain barrier regulation.
This aligns with evidence from (long) COVID research on microthrombi, BBB disruption, PET hypometabolism and EEG slowing, increased ischemic risk across multiple organs.
This is an uncomfortable result!Because it shows that cerebrovascular risk extends to mild and ambulatory infections, not limited to older or severely ill patients, cannot be easily dismissed, and it persists for years, not months.
Most importantly, it affects a population that was largely not targeted for long term cerebrovascular follow-up, and largely reassured that recovery was complete.
What this study does not claim?
It does not suggest that everyone who had COVID-19 will have a stroke.
It does not imply an extreme individual risk.
It does not define mechanisms at the individual patient level.
What it does show is clear?
SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a long-lasting increase in population-level cerebrovascular risk - even after mild disease.
Sum:
COVID-19 increases long-term risk of cerebral ischemia not only after severe illness but also after mild infection, likely through persistent endothelial and microvascular dysfunction that remains clinically silent until it manifests.
Changela et al., Risks of Stroke and Transient Cerebral Ischemia up to 4 Years Post-SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Large Diverse Urban Population in the Bronx. Diagnostics 2025. mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/2…
In public discourse, the limited follow up and the focus on clinically diagnosed events often create a false impression -
The risk is small - nothing is really happening.
In reality
we do not know how many vascular insults have already occurred
we do not know how many are yet to come
we do not know when or if the effect plateaus or reverses.
What we do know is this -
the risk curve has not returned to baseline even after four years.
That means -
no one has followed patients long enough to determine when or whether risk normalizes,
no one is counting the cumulative number of small vascular insults,
no one is systematically looking for subclinical ischemic events.
Transient ischemic attacks likely represent the visible tip of ongoing microvascular dysfunction - endothelial injury, impaired cerebral perfusion, and low-grade hypercoagulability that persist long after infection.
What we measure as stroke or TIA is likely only a fraction of a cumulative, silent vascular burden - one that may later manifest as cognitive decline, reduced brain resilience, or increased vulnerability to major stroke.
@szupraha @ZdravkoOnline @adamvojtech86 a @CzechCardiology, co pět let předstírá, že s tím nemá nic společného.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zdenek Vrozina

Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZdenekVrozina

Dec 14
Severe COVID-19 leaves behind a long-lasting, systemic, and biologically measurable pro-oncogenic state
that persists for at least one year after infection and may increase cancer risk or worsen cancer prognosis🧵
The authors analyzed long-term changes in gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) one year after COVID-19 infection.
They focused on differences between mild disease and severe COVID-19 with pneumonia, and on how these long-lasting changes relate to biological pathways involved in cancer.
Read 24 tweets
Dec 12
What a new Nature Immunology study shows about long COVID?
Long COVID is not post-infectious fatigue.
A new study shows that it is a clearly defined biological state =
chronic immune activation, T-cell exhaustion, and metabolic disruption🧵
The study analyzed 142 individuals, including 28 patients with long COVID.
Compared with recovered controls, people with long COVID showed persistent activation of inflammatory pathways lasting more than 180 days after infection.
These pathways include IL-6, IFN-γ, JAK–STAT signaling, complement activation, and coagulation pathways.
This pattern does not look like recovery.
It looks like an immune system that remains stuck in an activated state.
Read 21 tweets
Dec 12
Can pathological processes continue in the brain without an active virus?
Yes.
The SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein on its own can accelerate microglial aging by switching cellular metabolism toward glycolysis, leading to measurable memory impairment🧵
This study shows that the N protein is not biologically neutral.
Even in the absence of viral replication, it is sufficient to trigger long-lasting dysfunction in the brain.
What exactly is being damaged?
The primary target is microglia, the brain’s immune cells.
They are not merely activated.
They are metabolically reprogrammed.
Read 20 tweets
Dec 9
COVID isn’t only about the virus being strong - but about the body’s ability to restore balance being disrupted. So a another direction is emerging -
instead of only studying what the virus does, researchers are looking at how the body’s regulatory systems break down🧵
A recent review shows that SARS-CoV-2 can block the cell’s clean-up system, which normally removes damaged molecules and leftover virus. When this system stalls, viral pieces remain, the immune system stays activated, and inflammation escalates.
A key regulator here is TFEB, which controls how cells recycle, generate energy, and coordinate immune responses. If TFEB is disrupted, it may help explain both severe inflammation in acute COVID and ongoing symptoms in Long COVID.
Read 14 tweets
Dec 7
A new study mapped how SARS-CoV-2 variants disrupt human biology using a custom tool called BioEnrichPy.
Unlike typical pipelines, it automates the full workflow - data parsing, enrichment (GO/KEGG), stats, visual output🧵
Why this matters.
Variant-specific host interactions are usually analyzed manually - slow, fragmented, and error-prone.
BioEnrichPy standardizes this into a reproducible, scalable process that can handle large interactomes.
Effectively, it lets researchers ask -
Which human pathways are hijacked by Alpha, Delta, or Omicron - and how does this evolve over time?
Read 15 tweets
Dec 6
A large peer-review study from China (40,537 people, 3 hospitals, 2021–2024) found that a single wave of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Omicron BA.5/BF.7) was followed by a measurable loss of T cells that lasted more than 20 months.
Not a small fluctuation - a durable shift in immunity.🧵
Study headline result.
~10% reduction in CD8+ T cells still present ~20 months after infection.

For an individual - maybe subtle.
For a population -a meaningful shift in antiviral capacity.
T cells matter because they handle clearing infected cells, keeping latent viruses in check, anti-tumor surveillance, immune regulation.
If they’re low for a long time, the immune system isn’t just recovering - it’s operating with reduced capacity.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(