#SupremeCourt hears the plea challenging the Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: 4 issues which we need your assistance...
Divan : there is a change in the darshan timing, this is very much part of the rituals, very importance significance was given to these timings, so unlike other temples- which may have element of flexibility
CJI: if the hours are increased what is the problem?
Divan: this requires a degree of sensitivity... historically the darshan followed strict timings
Divan explains that a change in these timings means a change in the inner rituals including the period of rest for the diety
CJI: this is the time when the so called affluent people, who are paying hefty amount are allowed to do rituals
CJI: this is the time when they indulge in all kind of practises, they invite those who can pay a hefty amount
Divan: that apprehension is correct, but its a seperate issue
CJI: the second heading- abolishing the practise of daily pooja... let us presume- suppose there is a fall out of 10-15k on orginal timing, but what is the fallout of several thousand
Divan: we donot want a situation of stampede, we need control on the traffic of devotees..its a different issue
Divan: Dehri Pooja is at a particular location, this location has been shut, performed at the feet of the lord...our suggestion is that - dehri pooja between guru and shishya, has been discontinued, this ought not to be the situation
CJI: The committee's presence needs to be allowed
CJI: at the outset, on the oral application made by the applicant, we implead the temple management, through district magistrate, Mathura, let notice be issued to the High Powered Committee, state of UP and Mathura, Vrindavan
CJI: we are issuing notice, opening week- Tuesday/Wednesday
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#MadrasHighCourt to continue hearing batch of appeals against order allowing lighting of lamp at the Stone pillar (Deepathoon) at the #Thirupparankunram hills
The appeals are being heard by the bench of Justice G Jayachandran and Justice KK Ramakrishnan
#Thirupparankunram
In the previous hearing, the State had argued that the petitioner devotees did not have a legal right and the court could not create new custom
#SupremeCourt hears petition filed by the Union against the September 27 judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which directed the Government to repatriate certain persons deported to Bangladesh
SG : can this be kept on some other day ?
CJI: is she getting proper treatment? any financial assistance she requires
Counsel : she is at her father's house, she was working as maid in Delhi
Sr Adv Sanjay Hegde: another lady , in another petitioner, there is a lady with 2 children...I can provide documents about them, let him take a look prima facie...all 4 (including husband)
#MadrasHighCourt will hear today a batch of pleas in connection with lighting of lamp at the stone pillar in #Thiruparankundram hills
Appeals have been filed by Dist Collector, Dargah authorities, TN Wakf Board, HR&CE Dept, Executive officers of temple and others against the Dec 1 order of single judge directing temple authorities to light lamp at the stone pillar livelaw.in/high-court/mad…
Letter patent appeals have also been filed against Dec 4 order of single judge in contempt plea quashing the prohibitory order under S. 144 CrPC
Telangana Phone Tapping case | #SupremeCourt hears anticipatory bail plea of ex intelligence chief T Prabhakar Rao, accused of intercepting phones of politicians, high court judges etc. to aid the previous BRS government.
Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan.
The Court in October asked Rao to reset and share his iCloud password with police after the State claimed that he formatted his devices and destroyed evidence while enjoying interim protection from arrest. livelaw.in/top-stories/te…
It is Rao's case that the data was deleted as per official protocol on the order of a Review Committee due to sensitivity of information.
ASG SV Raju: mylords wanted me to give a written note. One judgment I would like to show a 2013 judgment. It was argued that there was nothing in Sharjeel Imam speech.
Reads a document- theory of agency applies in a conspiracy. Also refers to the Rajiv Gandhi assassination judgment.
Here prima facie is accepted because cognisance was taken for 120B IPC. Therefore, Sharjeel Imam's case will be considered as evidence against others.
On rejoinder-on delay not attributable to them- prosecution is ready to argue however objected by the accused persons.