That's odd, given that California has been the site of some of the most egregious H-1B abuse.
Take the infamous case of Southern California Edison: Hundreds of U.S. tech workers were laid off and then forced to train their H-1B replacements just to get their severance package.
"They told us they could replace one of us with three, four, or five Indian personnel and still save money," said a laid-off SCE worker. "They said, we can get four Indian guys for cheaper than the price of you."
Is that what "high-skilled immigration" looks like to @AGRobBonta?
There are countless more cases like this—too many to recount in one thread.
H-1Bs are largely used for tech and STEM occupations. But we've seen it used and abused egregiously, not to hire workers because they're high-skilled specialists, but merely because they're cheaper.
As I noted last month, foreign workers on these programs need to be sponsored by a U.S. employer. As a result, they're often uniquely compliant and hesitant to complain about subpar wages or conditions.
Companies leverage this to maximize their profits.
Wisconsin is another state that's suing to protect their H-1B scheme.
Harley Davidson, headquartered in Milwaukee, has been sued in federal court for partnering with Indian outsourcing firms to lay off Wisconsinite IT workers and force them to train their H-1B replacements.
In Connecticut—another state on the lawsuit—we see the same story.
As their Democratic senator himself has pointed out, multiple major companies in Connecticut have carried out mass layoffs of American tech workers and (surprise!) forced them to train their H-1B replacements.
One laid-off American in Connecticut recalls not just being forced to train his replacement, but 10 additional workers back in India via web conferencing.
Read this story, process how outrageous it is, and then understand: This has happened to tens of thousands of Americans.
Illinois is another plaintiff. One of their largest employers has also been accused of—you guessed it—laying off hundreds of Americans and making them train their H-1B replacements.
In protest, the laid-off U.S. workers put American flags outside their cubicles before they left.
Once again, it's worth pointing out: Illinois' Democrat senator Dick Durbin slammed these layoffs publicly. He's been pushing for H-1B reform for decades.
There's even a number of Democrat senators who have been sounding the alarm on this for a long time.
But that's the point: H-1B abuse is so bad that it's perhaps the one area of immigration restriction that still enjoys some bipartisan support.
So all the smears about "right-wing extremism" won't work here.
Democrat AGs have to explain why their OWN SENATORS are wrong.
New Jersey is another plaintiff.
It's home to Toys "R" Us, which brought in H-1B workers from India to shadow employees for weeks (even following them to the restroom) so the foreign workers could create manuals on how to do the jobs themselves. Then the Americans were laid off.
I could go on and on. In Washington, Microsoft recently announced mass layoffs while applying for thousands of H-1B visas.
In Minnesota, many of the state's largest employers have laid off Minnesotan IT workers—sometimes hundreds at a time—and outsourced them to India.
In announcing this lawsuit, Oregon's Attorney General claimed that H-1Bs allow employers like Oregon State University "to hire skilled foreign workers in specialized roles."
...so then why is OSU applying for H-1Bs to fill the position of "intern"?
Remember, the central argument from apologists for this system is that companies need H-1Bs because they *can't find an American to do the job.*
But in many cases, Americans literally WERE doing the jobs.
And they got laid off and replaced with cheaper foreign labor.
These are often late-career workers. They don't have the luxury of starting over.
Read these stories from @CIS_org. These are real Americans. Mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, sons and daughters of this nation. Our fellow citizens.
What are we doing to our own people?
@CIS_org As I've said before, the H-1Bs were sold as a way to keep America "globally competitive."
Instead, they've been used to import millions of foreign nationals to replace American workers—and transfer entire industries into the hands of foreign lobbies.
Mohsen Mahdawi, a 34 year old at Columbia University who spent 15 YEARS as an undergrad student, is on his way to being deported back to his native Jordan.
These "forever students" show a MASSIVE loophole in our system. 🧵
Foreign nationals on F-1 visas staying enrolled 15-25+ years to live here indefinitely.
Thousands of foreign "students" who entered 2000-2010 STILL have active F-1 status as of 2025.
This is ridiculous and must end.
DHS calls them exactly that: "forever" students, perpetually enrolled to remain in the U.S.
No repeated vetting. Weak oversight.
Past admins let this drag on since the 1970s "duration of status" rule.
Victory. No more taxpayer-backed home loans for illegal aliens.
This is one of those things you can't believe was actually happening.
American citizens are struggling to buy homes while mass migration drives up prices and strains the housing supply. 🧵
Mass migration is driving up home prices: HUD report shows foreign-born residents fueled over half of owner-occupied housing growth in CA & NY, spiking costs for American buyers.
This move by @SecretaryTurner ends American taxpayers paying for housing for illegals.
Illegal aliens were never eligible, but the Biden administration bent the rules.
Secretary Turner is fixing it with audits and DHS checks. Americans who play by the rules, stay prioritized.
The Trump Administration just declared the EEOC’s disparate-impact regime unconstitutional.
Disparate impact forced employers to trade neutral standards for racial quotas.
This is a direct strike on one of the Left’s favorite tools for forcing racial outcomes through law.
For decades, disparate impact let our managerial elite treat neutral standards as suspect if they produced the “wrong” racial numbers.
It banned things like background checks, aptitude tests, knowledge exams, hiring screens, and merit-based selection.
That regime is over.
OLC’s conclusion is clear: EEOC’s Title VII guidelines are unconstitutional because they impose liability based on disparate outcomes alone and pressure employers into race-based decision making.
According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation, its client is challenging the Illinois Voting Rights Act of 2011’s redistricting mandates under the Fifteenth Amendment and federal Voting Rights Act.
That is exactly the kind of litigation Callais invites.
Illinois did not hide the ball.
When Gov. Pritzker signed the maps, he invoked the Illinois Voting Rights Act and praised redistricting plans designed to preserve “clusters of minority voters” with “collective electoral power.”
Virginia's map just got struck down. Is California next?
California's "mapmaker" drew its new maps to "ensure" that racially gerrymandered "VRA seats are bolstered in order to make them most effective." That's illegal under Callais.
@AAGDhillon: Here's how we can do it. 🧵
California state law requires an "independent" Commission to draw its district maps.
But Newsom and state Legislature Dems overrode the Commission last year to gerrymander.
That meant hiring a "mapmaker"—Paul Mitchell—to do it.
But he drew an illegal racial gerrymander.
Before SCOTUS's recent Callais decision, courts interpreted the VRA to effectively *require* racial quotas in gerrymandering.
As Justice Thomas explained, that was “repugnant to any nation that strives for the ideal of a color-blind Constitution.”