Noel Ceta Profile picture
Dec 15 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
AI-generated content ranks slower than human content.

The problem isn’t your prompts. It’s your internal linking strategy.

Without 3× more strategic internal links, AI content sits idle for months, even after editing.

Here’s why AI content demands far more internal links to compete and how to implement it 🧵👇
1/ The AI content ranking problem:

Performance gap identified:

Human-written content:

- Average time to page 1: 4-6 months
- Internal links needed: 3-5 per article
- Engagement signals: Strong

AI-generated content (with editing):

- Average time to page 1: 7-10 months
- Internal links needed: 10-15 per article
- Engagement signals: Weaker

Same quality after editing. Different ranking velocity.

Internal links compensate for trust deficit.
2/ Why Google treats AI content differently:

Algorithm pattern recognition:

AI content characteristics:

- Less natural linking between ideas
- Weaker topical connections
- Lower initial trust signals
- Formulaic structure patterns

Human content characteristics:

- Natural contextual references
- Organic topic connections
- Higher initial trust
- Varied structure

Internal links signal topical relationships Google might miss in AI content.
3/ The internal linking formula for AI content:

Minimum requirements per article:

Traditional content: 3-5 internal links

- 2-3 contextual (in-body)
- 1-2 navigational (related posts)

AI content: 10-15 internal links

- 6-8 contextual (in-body, deeply integrated)
- 2-3 pillar page links (authority transfer)
- 2-3 related topic links (cluster building)
- 1-2 conversion links (commercial pages)

Density: 1 internal link per 200-250 words in AI content.
4/ Strategic internal link placement:

Where to add links in AI content:

High-value positions:

- Introduction (1-2 links to pillar content)
- First H2 section (1 contextual link)
- Each subsequent H2 (1-2 links)
- Before conclusion (1 related topic link)
- Conclusion (1 conversion link)

Anchor text variety:

- Exact match: 20%
- Partial match: 40%
- Branded: 20%
- Generic: 20%

Strategic distribution signals comprehensive coverage.
5/ The topical authority boost:

Internal links build content clusters:

AI content linking pattern:

Pillar page (hub)

10-15 AI cluster articles

Each links back to pillar
+
Each links to 5-8 related cluster articles

Result: Dense topical network.

Google recognizes comprehensive topic coverage. AI content benefits more from this structure than human content.
6/ Why 3x more links works:

Testing results:

Control group (AI content, 3-5 links):

- Ranking timeline: 8-10 months
- Average position at 6 months: 18-25

Test group (AI content, 10-15 links):

- Ranking timeline: 5-7 months
- Average position at 6 months: 8-12

More internal links accelerated AI content rankings by 40%.
7/ Human content with same link volume showed minimal additional benefit.

AI content needs 3x more internal links because:

- Compensates for weaker natural connections
- Signals topical relevance to Google
- Builds content cluster authority faster
- Transfers trust from established pages
- Improves crawl depth and frequency

Formula: 1 internal link per 200-250 words for AI content.

Traditional 3-5 links per article insufficient for AI-generated content.

10-15 strategic internal links required for competitive ranking speed.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noel Ceta

Noel Ceta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @noelcetaSEO

Dec 14
The skyscraper technique is supposedly "dead" in 2025.

Yet our modified version drove 34 high-authority links in 90 days.
Without mass outreach or 10x content bloat.

Classic approach fails, but this updated framework still works. Here's what changed: 🧵👇
1/ Why classic skyscraper fails now:

Original technique (2013-2020):

- Find ranking content
- Make it 10x better
- Outreach to linkers

Problem in 2025:

- Everyone did this (overcrowded)
- "Better" isn't enough (incremental improvement)
- Webmasters ignore generic outreach
- Takes 40+ hours per piece

Success rate dropped from 15% to 3%.
2/ The 2025 modification:

What we changed:

Instead of: Make existing content better
New approach: Add completely new angle or data

Instead of: 10x length
New approach: Unique value impossible to find elsewhere

Instead of: Mass outreach
New approach: Hyper-targeted (15-20 sites maximum)

Focus shifted from "more" to "different."
Read 8 tweets
Dec 13
Instagram account with 2,400 followers jumped 8 spots in Google Maps

Without changing anything on their website.

Social signals aren’t a direct ranking factor…
but they absolutely move local SEO.

Here's how social signals impact local SEO: 🧵👇
1/ The Social-Local Connection:

Google doesn't directly rank based on social followers.

But social signals affect:

- Brand searches (people Google your business)
- Direct GMB engagement
- Review generation
- Website traffic
- NAP consistency

Indirect but powerful.
2/ Strategy 1: Location Tagging

Tag your exact business location in EVERY post.

Why it matters:

- Reinforces your location
- Shows up in location searches
- Creates brand association with place
- Drives foot traffic
- Triggers "I've been here" engagement

Consistency = local authority.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 12
SEO stakeholders killed 3 high-impact projects before I learned stakeholder management.

Spent 2 years navigating organizational politics.

Here's what actually works to get SEO initiatives approved and executed: 🧵👇
1/ Map your stakeholders first:

Key players:

- CEO (revenue focus)
- CFO (ROI focus)
- CMO (brand focus)
- VP Product (roadmap focus)
- Engineering (capacity focus)

Each has different priorities. Understand them before proposing anything.
2/ Speak their language:

Same SEO project, different pitches:

To CEO: "Increase leads 40% in 12 months"
To CFO: "CAC drops $300 to $180, payback in 18 months"
To CMO: "Own thought leadership, 500K monthly impressions"
To Engineering: "2-week sprint, 15% conversion lift"
Read 11 tweets
Dec 11
We systematically targeted FAQ-based featured snippets for 9 months.

Won 200 featured snippets across our content library.

Traffic increased 285% from snippet visibility alone.

Here's the complete implementation process: 🧵👇

Follow + Comment 'FAQ' to get the featured snippet targeting template within 24h.
1/ Starting position and opportunity:

Baseline performance before FAQ strategy:

Site metrics (Month 0):

- 350 published articles
- 15 featured snippets owned
- Organic traffic: 45,000 sessions/month
- Niche: B2B SaaS tools and software

Opportunity identified:

- Analyzed 1,000 target keywords
- 420 triggered FAQ-based featured snippets (42%)
- We ranked positions 3-10 for 280 of these
- Snippet win potential: High

Decision: Systematically optimize for FAQ snippets.
2/ The research and targeting process:

Identifying snippet opportunities:

Step 1: Keyword analysis (Week 1-2)

- Exported 1,000 target keywords from Ahrefs
- Filtered for questions (who, what, where, when, why, how)
- 680 question-based keywords identified

Step 2: SERP analysis (Week 3-4)

- Manually checked each keyword SERP
- Identified which show featured snippets
- 420 keywords with active snippets

Step 3: Qualification (Week 5-6)

- Current ranking: Positions 1-10 only (we need visibility)
- Snippet type: Paragraph or list format
- Competition level: Snippet holder DR and content quality

Qualified targets: 280 achievable snippet opportunities.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 10
Client had 2,847 pages with 404 errors.

Each 404 = wasted opportunity.
Some had backlinks pointing to them.
Link equity flowing to dead pages.

Created 404 recovery strategy.

Results:

- Recovered 340 backlinks
- Rankings improved for 67 pages
- Traffic increased 45%

Here's the exact 404 fixing process: 🧵👇
1/ Finding all your 404s

Method 1: Google Search Console

- Index → Pages → Not found (404)
- Export list
- Sort by referring pages (priority)

Method 2: Screaming Frog

- Crawl site
- Filter: Status Code → 404
- Export with inlinks

Method 3: Server logs

- Check 404 requests
- See which get traffic
- Prioritize those

Client had:

- 2,847 total 404s
- 340 with backlinks
- 127 with actual traffic

Fixed high-value ones first.
2/ The 404 triage system

Priority 1 (fix immediately):

- Has backlinks
- Has traffic
- High-value keyword potential

Priority 2 (fix this week):

- Has backlinks OR traffic
- Part of important section
- Frequently requested

Priority 3 (fix when possible):

- No backlinks, no traffic
- Old/irrelevant content
- Low priority

Client focused on Priority 1:

- 340 pages
- Fixed in 2 weeks
- Massive impact
Read 8 tweets
Dec 10
One law firm generated $10M in signed case value from organic search over 18 months.

No paid ads. Pure SEO strategy.

Here's the complete playbook they used: 🧵👇
1/ Firm profile and starting position:

Baseline metrics before SEO investment:

Law firm details:

- Practice area: Personal injury (car accidents, slip and fall)
- Location: Mid-sized US city (population 500K)
- Firm size: 4 attorneys
- Years established: 12 years

Starting SEO performance (Month 0):

- Organic traffic: 850 sessions/month
- Ranking keywords: 120
- Leads from organic: 3-5/month
- Case value from organic: ~$150K/year

Decided to invest seriously in SEO after paid ads became too expensive ($800+ per lead).
2/ Investment and timeline:

Budget allocation over 18 months:

SEO budget: $6,500/month average

Breakdown:

- Content creation: $3,000/month (15-20 articles/month)
- Technical SEO: $1,000/month (site optimization, local SEO)
- Link building: $1,500/month (local citations, PR, guest posts)
- Strategy and management: $1,000/month

Total investment: $117,000 over 18 months

Return: $10M in case value (85x ROI)

Note: Legal cases have long sales cycles, settlement times extended.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(