Ceb K. Profile picture
Dec 17 6 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Good old post from @curtis_yarvin on the viral Compact Mag essay: the culture industry’s a MLM federal jobs program designed to produce people capable of noticing & replicating & teaching the preferred narrative, bc this comes with status benefits, & it’s what allows for capture- Image
Image
Image
Image
@curtis_yarvin The first creative writing program was only created in 1936—at Iowa, still the top of the pyramid & origin of every official fad. By 1980 there were over 250 in the US; now ~500. As writing becomes this kind of commissariat, ofc it’s vulnerable to dysfunctional campaigns & purges Image
Image
Image
Image
@curtis_yarvin Wokeness is worst in academia, journalism, publishing, etc—the culture industry—bc they all fit the same patterns Yarv noticed about MFAs: they’ve been “generously” institutionalized into MLM jobs programs which also teach laity how to “appreciate” their officially valid “craft.”
@curtis_yarvin Thus thx to MFAs, postwar litfic taught us that good writing is about pointedly not saying something so the audience can feel smart or involved or alive by filling it in (“show don’t tell”): “Hills Like White Elephants,” Carver stories etc—a neat old trick
@curtis_yarvin This doesn’t mean Carver’s bad, just that he’s easy for MFAs to turn into silly tricks. Likewise the take economy was about teaching us how to have ironic takes on how “X pop culture item is actually about Y political issue—& that’s Z” (which can be fun!)

@curtis_yarvin But if the point of a system is peer review, then it quickly falls; many great institutions take off by attracting the greatest peers, then attract strivers who cargo cult & so smother greatness, & then fall prey to fads, as greats begin again from scratch

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ceb K.

Ceb K. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CEBKCEBKCEBK

Oct 28
In 1974 Congress was upset about Nixon having refused to spend appropriated money on programs he disliked, so they banned this discretion in a law that also formalized all the appropriations bills (usually 11-13 per year) into one standardized process. Huge constitutional change:
There’d only ever been one “omnibus” bill before this in our nation’s whole history (1950, as an efficiency experiment that nobody found interesting or fruitful then). The 2nd was in 1986. From 2012 to 2024, 147 of 149 budget bills were passed in omnibus form. Huge transformation
Those two exceptions were so minor they further prove the rule: in 2015 DHS was funded separately bc the rest of the budget could be agreed on before funding disputes about Obama’s DACA/DAPA were settled; & in 2017 VA/MilCon got funded before the rest of the budget bc bipartisan.
Read 26 tweets
Oct 21
Odd! Not sure what one could possibly make of this! Very surprising to anyone who’s ever interacted with male, female, & mixed groups! We must fund extra research ASAP to figure out what combination of carrots for women & sticks for men can help women come out as equally liberal! Image
Image
Image
Image
As teen was taught female orgasms require complex rube goldberg machinations. It’s actually quite simple, but getting any group which defers to its female members to eg actually consider any factual or logical assertion instead of status quo-ing requires comical game foreplay etc
Feminized groups may defer to judging propositional claims by whether they confirm ingroup status, & assuming that interlocutors are actually just asking for entry, but if you dance well & bring flowers & grovel for the hotties & pity their ugly friends… then they can be liberal
Read 5 tweets
Oct 12
He notes that starting around 1965, US college students began throwing shrill fits at their admins in ways that their admins began coddling instead of disciplining. He notes that this began at UC Berkeley (which “boast[ed] more women students than any other US coed institution”). Image
Image
Image
Image
The alum page on “150 years of women at Berkeley” notes that women were prominent in all these campaigns (& for once they’re not just making them up as “hidden figures”). 1960s was when all the “in loco parentis” rules evaporated—no more female curfews, bans on mixed sleepovers… Image
Image
Image
Image
Note that the graph is about graduations, so enrollments feminize ~4 years earlier (ie incoming students surpass the ~1940 feminization peak in just about exactly 1965). Note also that teen guys going off to uni act v differently if they can sleep over with girls w/out expulsions
Read 12 tweets
Sep 6
Men are more naturally monogamous bc we wanna just have our home life settled so we can use it as foundation for external pursuits. Women are the ones always working on their home life, introducing new projects to it, etc. If she’s in love, that means making his home better—but…
Polygamy’s only more common than polyandry bc a) it’s much more stable, & b) so many women so underhandedly pursue the few top men that sometimes they can’t focus enough to reject these additional distractions. Men who have their shit together never say “if only I had more wives”
Women’s desire is much more about being desired by someone desirable. ie romance is overwhelmingly about calling forth male effort (yes, women put in underhanded effort to call this forth but they want it to look like he’s just naturally choosing to sweep them off their feet etc)
Read 7 tweets
Sep 3
Men build civ best under monogamy: ie when we have to compete with each other over other things than extra wives; when that’s been successful & consensual, it’s thru neolocal nuclear families, thus not even about securing high-value mates for our kids. Opaque spergy men’s clubs >
ie perhaps the *removal of the desire to fuck women from public life* is what allows men to build civ: if we already have wives at home & can’t fruitfully seek extras, then we have no reason to let women into these clubs or cater their competitive outputs to women’s sensibilities
That way we can sperg out & focus on competing over status based on heterogenous expertise rather than social desirability. & so “weird intense antisocial nerds” like Newton can rise to the top. Can you imagine him being allowed more than conniving eunuch intrigue under polygamy?
Read 4 tweets
Aug 28
This is what “the sixties” actually meant: the 1950s were about “amoral excellence,” big-is-beautiful, etc (highways, air travel, television, football, company men, conglomerates, the space race…). Small-minded hippies rejected this as unnatural & scawy & enthroned mudhut morals
The Pentagon was only built at the end of WWII & even still the National Mall was covered in simple big War Department buildings through the 1950s as action-oriented power-seeking bureaucracies exploded (unlike the passive red-tape self-flagellating bureaucrats who replaced them) Image
Think about the names that embody this era: GM, IBM, AT&T; simple descriptive acronyms that yearned for total industrial takeoff, staffed by Company Men whose loyalty was to the conquest of the cosmos. Hippies rejected this for being too amoral energetic self-confident promethean
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(