Foreign governments are building a global censorship-industrial complex to crush freedom of speech online.
Now, they're trying to force social media companies to censor American speech on U.S. soil.
I wrote to @elonmusk to sound the alarm. 🧵
Now, they're trying to force social media companies to censor American speech on U.S. soil.
I wrote to @elonmusk to sound the alarm. 🧵
In Europe and elsewhere, foreign governments have imposed draconian censorship on their own people.
But they're also trying to impose it here—wielding their power to force U.S. companies to manipulate algorithms and take down content posted on U.S. soil.
But they're also trying to impose it here—wielding their power to force U.S. companies to manipulate algorithms and take down content posted on U.S. soil.
https://x.com/UnderSecPD/status/2001792037587460209
We expect this type of censorship in countries like Russia and China.
We don't expect it from our allies.
As @JDVance said, this is a betrayal of our shared heritage—an attack on political liberty in the cradle of the civilization that gave birth to it.
We don't expect it from our allies.
As @JDVance said, this is a betrayal of our shared heritage—an attack on political liberty in the cradle of the civilization that gave birth to it.
https://x.com/GBNEWS/status/1890412096182960435
But that's exactly what the EU, UK, Australia, and others are doing.
Under the banner of "online safety" or fighting "hate speech" and "disinformation," these countries have enacted laws like the Digital Services Act and built a global censorship regime backed by powerful NGOs:
Under the banner of "online safety" or fighting "hate speech" and "disinformation," these countries have enacted laws like the Digital Services Act and built a global censorship regime backed by powerful NGOs:
For example, when the EU threatened X for hosting a conversation between @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk, they cited the DSA.
They warned X that "harmful content" and "disinformation" might have "negative effects" in the EU, giving rise to liability:
They warned X that "harmful content" and "disinformation" might have "negative effects" in the EU, giving rise to liability:
https://x.com/ThierryBreton/status/1823033048109367549
These laws empower European bureaucrats to target specific posts to censor.
So if you make a satirical joke from the U.S. criticizing Europe's mass migration policies after an "asylum seeker" goes on a stabbing rampage, French authorities might demand X censor your post:
So if you make a satirical joke from the U.S. criticizing Europe's mass migration policies after an "asylum seeker" goes on a stabbing rampage, French authorities might demand X censor your post:
Or if you suggest that immigrants who commit crimes should be deported, German bureaucrats will demand social media companies censor your speech:
Or if you suggest that everyone driving electric vehicles might not be the best environmental or economic idea since sliced bread, Europe's Ministers of Truth will demand social media companies censor you simply because some bureaucrat disagrees with your position:
But they can't efficiently enforce their diktats one post a time, so these laws require the social media to do it for them through algorithmic censorship.
That way, the algorithm censors you automatically—in accordance with their hard-left speech codes—before you ever go viral:
That way, the algorithm censors you automatically—in accordance with their hard-left speech codes—before you ever go viral:
A study recently found that this algorithmic censorship (shadow-banning, throttling posts, deboosting content) didn't just impact so-called "illegal content," but often targeted and censored a much broader swathe of speech—basically, anything that leftist bureaucrats didn't like.
So in France, speech favoring right-wing politicians was commonly censored.
And in Germany, targets of censorship included speech that cast doubt on the far-left's climate agenda.
And in Germany, targets of censorship included speech that cast doubt on the far-left's climate agenda.
The study suggested this algorithmic censorship was connected to these countries' laws.
In Germany, the NetzDG law uses several mechanism to incentivize platforms to censor.
As my letter explains, the DSA takes the exact same approach.
That threatens US free speech.
In Germany, the NetzDG law uses several mechanism to incentivize platforms to censor.
As my letter explains, the DSA takes the exact same approach.
That threatens US free speech.
The EU recently fined X for $140 million under the DSA. The EU says it wasn't about speech, but as my letter explains that is a ruse.
Indeed, the fine came as part of the EU's multi-pronged attack on X under the DSA—and we all know this is about X's refusal to censor Americans.
Indeed, the fine came as part of the EU's multi-pronged attack on X under the DSA—and we all know this is about X's refusal to censor Americans.
Simply put, we can't allow clowns like these folks to determine what Americans get to see online.
If Europe wants to sacrifice its own liberty on the altar of leftism, that's their choice.
But we won't allow them to export that petty tyranny to the US.
If Europe wants to sacrifice its own liberty on the altar of leftism, that's their choice.
But we won't allow them to export that petty tyranny to the US.
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1891325438523547716?s=20
The censorship-industrial complex threatening Americans' speech went global.
We must use the tools available at our disposal to secure our citizen's most fundamental rights.
You can read my full letter here: schmitt.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…
We must use the tools available at our disposal to secure our citizen's most fundamental rights.
You can read my full letter here: schmitt.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
