COVID doesn’t have to kill neurons to change brain function. It can retune how neurons regulate their messages.🧵
A new PLOS ONE paper shows that SARS-CoV-2 leaves a measurable molecular footprint in the brain - specifically in how neurons process their mRNA
A lot of COVID brain talk is inflammation / clots / imaging. This paper zooms in on something quieter - but powerful. How brain cells finish their mRNAs!
The key concept is alternative polyadenylation (APA) - the same gene can end its mRNA at different poly(A) sites - making shorter or longer 3’UTRs.
Why care? The 3’UTR is the control panel for where an mRNA goes, how long it survives, and how strongly it’s translated (RNA-binding proteins + miRNAs). Neurons lean heavily on this fine-tuning.
They reanalyzed single nucleus RNA-seq from frontal cortex, comparing controls vs COVID cases, and called poly(A) sites with a dedicated pipeline (SCAPTURE).
Their main readout is basically - How often does a cell choose a proximal poly(A) site? More proximal choice usually means shorter 3’UTRs.
And - wow. Neurons shift hard toward proximal poly(A) sites after infection. This shows up strongly in both glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons (very significant by KS test). Big result.
Meanwhile, non-neuronal cells show smaller / mixed shifts with the loudest signal in neurons.
Then they connect APA changes with gene-expression changes and ask - What biological programs sit under these shifted transcripts? Enrichment points to neuronal development/function and RNA processing/splicing themes
They also flag that some gene sets map to neurological pathways - one example in the paper’s enrichments is Parkinson disease (as a pathway term) among certain APA/expression quadrants.
Next step - they overlay Which of these altered genes overlap with known risk-gene sets? They selected 15 common neuro + psych disorders for joint analysis.
AD, PD, epilepsy, ASD, depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, ADHD, MS, ischemic stroke, schizophrenia, ALS, Huntington disease, migraine, brain aging, anxiety.
Across cell types they compile 408 genes with notable APA+expression patterns. 267 are classified as risk genes from DisGeNET/BioKA/GWAS resources.
And they say those 267 show enrichment especially for AD, PD, and schizophrenia-related traits. (Risk-gene overlap/enrichment, not COVID causes X yet)
They give concrete - this is how it could matter - examples
CALM1 downregulated + shorter 3’UTR in glutamatergic neurons.
APP increased expression. 3’UTR shifts differ by cell type (oligos vs astrocytes). They discuss how APP 3’UTR length can influence translation and AD risk context-dependently.
They also model a huge miRNA layer (thousands of predicted miRNAs targeting these genes) - but they explicitly note this part is predictive and needs wet-lab validation.
Sum:
This paper is a mechanistic regulation fingerprint in post-mortem cortex - showing that after SARS-CoV-2, neurons can flip transcript endings in a way that plausibly reshapes synaptic biology.
Chen at al., Single-cell alternative polyadenylation analysis reveals mechanistic insights of COVID-19-associated neurological and psychiatric effects. journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
What we can’t tell from this dataset? Duration. It’s post-mortem and not longitudinal. The authors note limitations and that some findings (esp miRNA layer) are predictive. To prove persistence, you’d need time-stratified samples after recovery + disease controls.
There isn’t a single Undo button here. What papers like this suggest is a shift in mRNA regulation. That’s a network-level retuning - many small changes that can add up to noticeable brain function changes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Could COVID affect fertility through immune cross-reactions? This isn’t just online speculation anymore. Researchers are testing it head-on - identifying specific antibodies and checking what they do in living organisms🧵
A new paper in Journal of Autoimmunity builds on a classic idea in immunology - molecular mimicry. Some short stretches of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may resemble parts of human proteins involved in reproduction.
The team previously mapped spike segments with notable similarity to spermatogenesis-associated proteins, then synthesized four short spike peptides (peptides 1-4). The first question was simple. After infection, do people develop antibodies that recognize any of these peptide segments?
A large real-world preprint analysis (~193,000 people, 2020–2025) suggests that people chronically taking antihistamines had
fewer thrombotic events
and almost no recorded long COVID - even after multiple reinfections.
This is not proof. But it is not noise either.
First, the basics.
This is an observational study, not a randomized trial.
So it cannot establish causality.
What it can do is identify patterns worth taking seriously - especially when they are consistent across subgroups.
Immunity that once protected us from deadly infections
may now increase the risk of autoimmunity, Long COVID, and chronic inflammation.
A new review explains why🧵
Here’s the paradox.
The strongest genetic risk factors for autoimmune diseases are also some of the oldest immune genes we carry.
If they were purely harmful, evolution would have removed them long ago.
A review in Frontiers in Immunology focuses on a small group of ancestral HLA class II haplotypes -
DR2-DQ6, DR3-DQ2, and DR4-DQ8 - and their role in this paradox.
COVID-19 is often described as an inflammatory disease.
But new research shows SARS-CoV-2 goes deeper.
It alters regulatory layers inside cells at the RNA level, weakening antiviral defense from within.🧵
Thanks @NFMai @RWittenbrink
Cells contain long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs).
They don’t make proteins - they act as control hubs, coordinating immune signals, especially interferon (IFN) responses.
RNA function isn’t fixed.
It can be fine tuned by a chemical mark called m6A methylation, which changes RNA shape, interactions, and behavior - without changing RNA levels.
Severe COVID-19 leaves behind a long-lasting, systemic, and biologically measurable pro-oncogenic state
that persists for at least one year after infection and may increase cancer risk or worsen cancer prognosis🧵
The authors analyzed long-term changes in gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) one year after COVID-19 infection.
They focused on differences between mild disease and severe COVID-19 with pneumonia, and on how these long-lasting changes relate to biological pathways involved in cancer.
COVID-19 is not just an acute event - it is a long-term vascular insult.
This study shows that the risk of ischemic stroke remains elevated for at least four years after SARS-CoV-2 infection.🧵
The risk remains elevated including in people who
were not hospitalized,
had a mild or moderate course,
had no obvious neurological complications during the acute phase.
This strongly suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with lasting structural or functional vascular injury to the vascular system, rather than causing only a transient pro thrombotic episode.