States with no effective voter ID requirement average nearly 8x more welfare benefits to illegal immigrants compared to states requiring voter ID verification.
They are importing and paying illegals for votes.
Welfare benefit breakdown
States with no effective ID required vs ID required
Healthcare: 33% vs. 0%
Food assistance: 21% vs. 0%
Cash assistance: 71% vs. 22%
EITC: 46% vs. 0%
Methodology
Data Sources
Voter identification requirements were obtained from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), which categorizes state laws into five tiers based on strictness:
1. Strict Photo ID: must present government-issued photo identification 2. Strict Non-Photo ID: must present identification, photo not required 3. Non-Strict Photo ID: photo ID requested, but alternatives such as signing an affidavit are permitted 4. Non-Strict Non-Photo ID: ID requested, but voters may cast a regular ballot by signing an affidavit or having a poll worker vouch for identity 5. No Document Required – identity verified through signature matching, poll book verification, or similar non-documentary methods
For analysis, these five tiers were collapsed into two categories based on functional outcome: states where voters must present identification documents (tiers 1-3), and states where voters can cast a regular ballot without presenting any document (tiers 4-5).
Welfare benefit availability was compiled from the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) state policy maps (2023-2024), capturing four categories of benefits accessible to illegal immigrants:
Healthcare: State-funded health coverage for illegal immigrant adults
Food Assistance: State-funded food programs beyond federal restrictions
Cash Assistance: State-funded cash aid programs
EITC: State Earned Income Tax Credit available to ITIN filers
Sample
The analysis includes all 50 states plus the District of Columbia (N=51).
No effective ID requirement (tiers 4-5): 24 states
ID verification required (tiers 1-3): 27 states
States with no effective ID requirement average 7.7x more welfare benefits (1.71 vs 0.22) compared to states requiring ID verification.
Statistical Analysis
Each welfare category was coded as a binary variable (1=offered, 0=not offered). A composite welfare score (0-4) was calculated as the sum of benefits offered. Effect sizes were calculated using odds ratios.
Christopher Caldwell in his Age of Entitlement (2020) offers the best analysis that I have seen for why the universities are now all left-wing. It's not that left-wing ideas have "won". It's that universities (and govt institutions) have no choice, LEGALLY. Here's his argument:
The civil rights revolution created a second constitutional order.
This order, though its stated intention is equality, gradually displaced the older liberal order of procedural neutrality.
Federally funded institutions MUST pursue identity politics.
Over time, civil rights compliance obligations (Title VI, Title IX, affirmative action enforcement, diversity mandates, DEI bureaucracies, etc.) forced every major institution that takes federal funds--including universities--into a permanent left-coded institutional culture.
The modern Western political ideologies LIBERALISM, PROGRESSIVISM, and MARXISM should be understood as fundamentalist secularized denominations of Protestant Christianity.
All three descend from the same post-Reformation religious/moral structure:
PROTESTANTISM's faith alone became moral agency.
Inner conscience guided by God became secular trust in Reason, Science, or Justice.
Salvation became Progress.
Priesthood of all believers became moral equality.
Without God though, moral worth became performance to others.
Notably, all three ideologies inherit the DISTINCTIVE Protestant anthropology: a) the conviction that the individual conscience is the supreme authority, b) the suspicion that hierarchy is inherently corrupt, and c) a belief in history as a story of redemption from bondage.
When cloth masks were first recommended and then mandated during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was only one randomized controlled trial studying the use of cloth masks to prevent viral respiratory infections.
It showed a 13-fold increased risk of infection with cloth masks.
Cloth masks did not just appear to increase risk compared to surgical masks. They also appeared to increase risk compared to no masks.
None of this is to say that cloth masks really increase risk.
I mean, who knows? It's just one study.
It is to say that the CDC people pushing the masking policies were just making things up and accusing critics of their fairytales of "misinformation", though.
March 29, 2021 Rochelle Walensky, Director of CDC, infamously declared on MSNBC:
"Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick."
Emails obtained by FOIA from Jan 30, 2021 show that Walensky knew this was a lie at the time she said it.
1/12
See for yourself.
Without these lies, unconstitutional vaccine mandates would have been much more difficult to argue in court.
That's why she lied.
2/12
The claims made by Walensky ended up in arguments at the Supreme Court, influencing Biden vs. Missouri (a 5-4 decision) about COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers at facilities receiving federal funding.
And a huge impact on vaccine mandates more broadly.