1/ Kyrylo Budanov’s appointment as head of the Office of the President appears as continuation of the post-Yermak political transition — one that was temporary frozen during intensive negotiations with the US.
2/ This seems to me more about preparing for the end game of the war and for what follows: elections, elite rebalancing, and a far more turbulent 2026.
3/ Many argue this move will end Budanov’s political career by tying him to compromise, responsibility, and inevitable failures. But Budanov is being placed in a strategic position at a moment of maximum uncertainty — settlement talks, Western pressure, and internal power shifts.
4/ The key question is authority. How much real power can Budanov muster inside OPU — agenda-setting, human resources, security and political messaging — and how effectively he can use it as Yermak is believed to remain in a "back office".
5/ A reminder: Budanov was hesitant to accept the post. Zelensky reportedly courted him for months. The role offers political potential but also serious risk — OPU is uncharted territory and Yermak's centralized legacy.
6/ For Zelensky, the logic is twofold: strengthen his own position and legitimacy heading into 2026, while anchoring the security establishment to the political center at a decisive moment.
7/ Budanov matters here because he bridges domains others do not. He has served as a backchannel to the US, Russia, and Belarus, while simultaneously being labelled a war criminal by Moscow.
8/ He has also been among the security officials cautiously reminding interlocutors that ending the war, sooner rather than later, is in Ukraine’s strategic interest — a sensitive but necessary message.
9/ His appointment helps secure security-state buy-in for what comes next — and ties a formidable political figure to the president. Recent polls suggest both Zaluzhny and Budanov would defeat Zelensky in a second round.
10/ This move is therefore also about managing future competitors — including vis-à-vis Zaluzhnyi — while reducing the risk of fragmentation during transition.
11/ Bottom line: this is not succession yet. It is positioning. Budanov enters the most consequential political role of his career — and the most consequential year for Ukraine since 2022.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The fresh Essential Ukraine (#13) finds the war shifts toward a defined outcome. US diplomatic efforts are moving into detail just as Ukrainian military and European fiscal capacity tightens. Bottom line: the endgame is approaching, shaped by pressure rather than preference.
2/ Washington now runs two settlement tracks — one with Kyiv, one with Moscow. The four-cluster framework is now effectively confirmed: Territory (with Donbas as the immovable core); Security guarantees; NATO/European architecture; Sanctions & reconstruction.
3/ In Kyiv, withdrawal from Donbas remains politically indistinguishable from capitulation. Security guarantees are another hinge: without them, any settlement looks like Istanbul 2022. Question: what are credible guarantees when NATO troops in UA are a red line for Moscow.
1/ Yermak’s resignation is a genuine surprise in Kyiv. For months, insiders assumed Zelensky would sacrifice his parliamentary majority—or even his government—before parting with his powerful Chief of Staff. Yet the pressure finally converged.
2/ Early signs of distancing were visible. Zelensky began holding key meetings alone, without Yermak: with former Ambassador to the US Markarova, with GUR chief Budanov, normally interfaced through OPU. These gestures looked subtle at the time; in retrospect, they were indicators
3/ The immediate trigger was the anti-corruption raid that made explicit what many suspected: Yermak himself had become a target. The timing was deliberate, coming after revelations about alleged Russian passport of SAPO' Klymenko. The message was no one at Bankova is untouchable
1/ Essential Ukraine #12 is out. The headline: diplomacy has returned earlier than expected. The Alaska framework is back in a more detailed form — driven not only by Washington, but by a quiet shift in Kyiv under the weight of cumulative crises.
2/ The current wave of leaks aimed at disrupting the process. After the Alaska draft, Zelensky & Europeans rushed to US to buy time. Today, Kyiv negotiates from constraint: a deteriorating battlefield, corruption-driven political shock, Europe’s shrinking fiscal capacity.
3/ Those seeking to disrupt a "bad deal" must reckon w/ battlefield reality: Russia now holds the operational initiative — in manpower, artillery, even in drones. The fall of Pokrovsk and accelerating pressure along Zaporizhzhia axis mark the fastest Russian advance since 2022.
Update: 1/ Zelensky addressed the nation today — a speech that raised the stakes but revealed his core dilemma. He spoke after a call with Merz, Starmer, and Macron, all signaling that Europe will not support the U.S.-proposed peace outline at this format.
2/ Zelensky's position is impossible: he can neither accept the plan (dignity and sovereignty are at stake he said) nor reject it either w/o risking a rupture with Washington. The U.S. is driving the process; Europe is refusing the substance; Ukraine is trapped in the middle.
3/ Brussels keeps encouraging Zelensky to “hold steady,” yet the EU has its own problem: in December it must decide on using frozen Russian assets (its last card). If the mechanism collapses, Kyiv loses its financial lifeline. If it passes, Ukraine gains time (months not years).
1/I just returned from Kyiv, where President Zelensky is facing his most dangerous moment since the invasion: a cascading multi-crisis of worsening battlefield, a ballooning fiscal gap, deepening institutional infighting, political shock triggered by a corruption investigation.
2/ On the battlefield, Kyiv is concentrating everything on slowing Russia in Donbas. Moscow is exploiting this: the Russian army is opening conditions for a deeper breakthrough along the southern Zaporizhzhia axis. The front is becoming asymmetrical— dangerously so for Ukraine.
3/ Better news are on the energy front: authorities are cautiously optimistic that a system-wide collapse can be avoided this winter: gap in domestic gas production narrows, there is enough spare parts to repair the electricity grid. The situation is fragile but not catastrophic.
1/ The 10th edition of Essential Ukraine is out — marking a turning point in both war and diplomacy. The Alaska framework amended, the Budapest summit is postponed, Russia sanctioned, Moscow tests missiles — and the war escalates into a new phase of managed attrition.
2/ Washington’s tactic has shifted: after Kyiv rejected any withdrawal from Donbas and Europe resisted bringing Russia back to the table, Trump recalibrated. The U.S. now pressures Moscow — but the Western (and Ukrainian) “victory” has quietly narrowed to a managed draw.
3/ Moscow, though strained by new U.S. sanctions, holds structural advantages — both on the battlefield and in escalation. Systematic strikes on Ukraine’s energy grid, railways, and logistics keep Kyiv on the defensive. Pokrovsk, Kupiansk and the South are under heavy pressure.