Thread with excerpts from Boris Sax's "Stealing Fire", a book of the author reckoning with his discovery (after his father's death) that his father, Saville Sax, had been a major Soviet atomic spy, stealing important info on the A-bomb and likely the H-bomb and going unpunished.
The author was initially devastated, but eventually relieved at this discovery as partly explaining his father's awful lifetime behavior (living in black slums, beating his wife and kids, torturing dogs, never getting a stable job, dropping out of Harvard twice).
Saville's mother (author's paternal grandmother) was a Jewish immigrant from Russia. According to the author, she, like many Jews, became a Communist as a way to partly recreate an idealized version of her Russian village without the Ukrainian pogromists in America.
Saville's parents and friends recreated the Jewish ghetto in NYC, isolated from American society and seeing it as heartless and corrupt.
Saville's father was able to get rich selling looted Tsarist treasures in America after the Russian Revolution, crucially without having to actually accommodate himself to American society, and so remained a Communist.
The Jews of Saville's upbringing in their communist NYC ghetto despised their Orthodox cousins and saw communism as a way to provide cohesion to an apostate Jewish community. They scorned both Christians and religious Jews, and saw Jewishness and communism as synonyms.
Despite their secularism, this group was isolated enough to still practice arranged marriage. Saville's father nearly abandoned his mother in Soviet Russia to shack up with his mistress, but lost his nerve at the last moment.
Young men in the Russian-Jewish NYC ghetto were both prized and strictly controlled, taught that America was filled with covert Nazis.
Thanks to his parent's means of attaining wealth, Saville was brought up wealthy but completely outside the American mainstream, without such necessary habits as "showing up to work on time," and as such was downwardly mobile.
Apparently, baths were taken infrequently in the NYC Russian-Jewish ghetto to distinguish themselves from the American bourgeoise.
The author believes Saville (his father) was enticed to become a spy by the glamour and camaraderie. He worked with physicist Ted Hall. The two were discovered and surveilled after the fact by the FBI thanks to Venona, but not punished, perhaps to avoid leaking sources.
Saville and Hall were united by their status as spies, Communism, and Russian-Jewishness. But Hall, a brilliant physicist, was far more conventionally successful than Saville and wound up marrying a girl Saville liked, driving them apart.
The author's mother Susan, who eventually married Saville, was an "extreme liberal about racial equality" and was one of four founding members of CORE (Congress on Racial Equality) and an activist in the Civil Rights movement who later became disillusioned.
Saville was quite happy to defend murdering liberals as insufficiently advanced.
Saville was interviewed by the FBI, but never told his kids about the interview or the espionage, which made family life odd and him seem paranoid. The author, Boris, was harassed and attacked by the black kids he went to school with in Chicago for being white.
Saville hated Poles and Ukrainians (due to ethnic conflict in Eastern Europe), and saw blacks as allies and Christian whites as enemies, but the author believed support for Stalin disqualified one from moral authority, and was fascinated by the Polish neighborhood in Chicago.
As a result of growing up in a black ghetto, the author was not especially attracted to the culture and aesthetic as so many Americans were in the 60s.
Author's ethnic analogy: Jews (in Eastern Europe): Ukrainians : Russians :: Jews (in Chicago) : blacks : white Americans.
One of the more striking things about the book is the description of the 60s. Civil Rights protests and getting arrested (and immediately released) were perfectly normal for high schoolers.
Everyone pretty much went insane 1967-72. Cults and con artists and hippies and addicts and Communists and gangsters and prophets on every corner.
This was not really a youth rebellion, most of the leaders were older.
Another feature of the 60s: Saville was a fuckup by any metric (known Soviet spy, wife beater, unable to hold down a job, zero hygiene, double drop-out) who nevertheless marries, has kids, and lands a sinecure as a Program Director at the University of Southern Illinois.
Author's verdict on his father is mostly negative (and he is fairly conservative), but he did see a few positives (growing up outside the American mainstream made it easier to see what is actually was, fish/water etc). He believes generations are getting less serious.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Removing teachers (and soldiers, for fairness) lowers the gap, but it's still a big difference.
You can get slightly different numbers depending on what source you use and what exactly you count as public, but they all tell the same substantive story.
New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's a continuation of previous investigations on how LLMs trade off different lives.
In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I updated their framework with different categories and newer models in October 2025, and discovered that with the exception of Grok 4 (Fast), all models placed far more value on the lives of "left-coded" groups (nonwhites, non-men, LGBTQ, immigrants, leftists, Third Worlders) over "right-coded" groups (whites, men, non-queers, ICE agents, rightists, First Worlders). For example, Sonnet 4.5 saw the lives of South Asians as about 18 times as valuable as the lives of whites.
However, it's been several generations of model since October 2025, so I decided to try again with today's models: Claude Fable 5, Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.5, and Kimi K3. As it turns out, all of them are MUCH more egalitarian than their counterparts (except Grok 4.5, since Grok 4 was already egalitarian) from a year ago.
Finding 1: Sonnet 5 was the only model even close to last year's models, valuing nonwhites roughly four times higher than whites.
Finding 2: GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K3 are very close to perfectly egalitarian; Sol values whites at around 7/8ths nonwhites and K3 values blacks roughly 1.3 times as much as whites; these are tiny ratios by the standards of last year.
Finding 3: Claude Fable is pretty much perfectly egalitarian. This is very, very different from last year's Claude models. Grok 4.5 has retained the egalitarianism of previous generations of Grok despite the giant increase in capabilities and different team.
Every model I tested would have been the most egalitarian model (aside from Grok 4) last year. All models have come to resemble Grok in their exchange rates.
This is wrong. Kirk was not a particularly hated figure before he was killed; he was seen by Redditor-types as a goofy meme figure of mockery (see below, from 2023). He was only demonized by lefties *after* he was murdered, to retroactively justify the assassination.
Kirk was not a case of the lib hate machine whipping up hatred against someone until someone took a shot at him, it was a case of the lib hate machine ramping up after he was murdered.
This is one of the reasons why his murder was so shocking; I sort of expected people taking shots at Trump or Stephen Miller or even Elon Musk, who libs collectively saw as Hitler II, but not Kirk, who they mostly saw as a lolcow.
Thread with excerpts from "Foundations, their power and influence" (1958), by the former chairman of the Reece Committee, a Congressional committee to investigate the conduct of tax-exempt foundations.
The administrators of the great foundations formed an interlocking cartel wielding (illegally) immense political and cultural influence using other people's money, as the foundations are tax exempt.
Foundations are tax-exempt because they are supposed to be run for public benefit.
Thread with excerpts from "The French Intifada: The Long War Between France and its Arabs" (2014). This book, by a leftist (participant in communes) author, portrays race riots by Arab immigrants to France as simply one more episode in a centuries-long war between the two.
Both the French Left and Right framed the 2005 riots as part of the long French tradition of revolt. But they were wrong; the protestors were mostly Arabs rioting against France itself, not against "the bosses" or "the state."
The rioters (remember, Arab immigrants and their descendants) see themselves as soldiers in a long war against France, Europe, and even civilization itself. Recall that the author is on their side.
'The Unknown Warriors' (2006) is a collection of WWII veteran's views on modern Britain gathered via newspaper ad. So what did WWII veterans think of the 2006 UK? They hated it; 134 responses were negative vs only 6 positive (plus 31 N/A and 13 neutral). Excerpts below.
The below is typical (from a D-Day veteran): "I am absolutely disgusted with the way things are turning out... and sometimes wonder if it was worth all the suffering of a war."
"I have many, many misgivings on how matters have turned out. Problems seem to be resolved, by more and more legislation, instead of action at the source... What many veterans abhor, is the acceptance of homosexuality as the norm."