Is a former Venezuelan military and intel officer, served under Chavez, and became a key leader in the Cartel de Los Soles.
He was a "Chavista" and turned against Maduro in 2019, then fled the country.
That same year, 2019, the US announced charges against two Columbians who worked closely with Maduro's Regime and had engaged in a $350mil birbery and money laundering scheme.
Alex Saab Moran and Alvaro Pulido Vargas
Saab was also Maduro's liaison to Hezbollah and the Iranian Regime.
I do wonder if Saab, whom Biden sent back to Venezuela in a prisoner exchange for 10 Americans and fugitive Leonard Francis aka "Fat Leonard," helped the U.S. gather intel on Maduro's operations.
He had worked as a DEA source a time or two before...
A little over a year later, "The Chicken" was found hiding in Europe. I'm not sure if anyone got the $10mil reward that was on offer for him.
September 2021 - arrested in Spain
July 2023 - extradited to the U.S.
June 2025 - Pleads Guilty
Currently awaiting sentencing.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/f…
Another related case is United States v. Campo and Flores.
Antonio Campo Flores and Francisco Flores de Freitas are nephews of Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
The nephews were convicted in 2016 and alter sentenced to 18 years in prison.
But...
In October 2022, Biden swapped them back to Venezuela in exchange for five Americans held hostage and used as political pawns for years—the "Citgo Six" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citgo_Six
Hey, remember the graphics AG Barr presented in 2020? The "air bridge" one?
September 2024
The US, pursuant to EO 13884 and starts grabbing aircraft used by Maduro's Regime to transport narcotics and sanctioned members of FARC, Cartel de los Soles, and similar groups.
In capturing Maduro, the Trump Admin, U.S. Law Enforcement, and the U.S. Military may have decoupled Venezuela, and potentially the Western Hemisphere, from China, Iran, and Russia.
At the detention hearing on Dec 30, we learned that prosecutors had a 2-count indictment against Cole from a "local grand jury," meaning one empaneled by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia—not one empaneled by the federal court.
đź§µRichman v. United States
(Arctic Haze search warrant material case)
ORDER: DOJ must get a search warrant for Arctic Haze/Richman materials seized from Richman in 2017, 2019, and 2020.
And that includes materials under seal in the EDVA and within DOJ "component" offices.
Backstory:
Just days after United States v. Comey was dismissed for Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan being unlawfully appointed, Daniel Richman, who is Person 3 from the indictment in the Comey case, filed a civil case against the DOJ.
Richman wants the property he volunteered to DOJ in 2017 and the materials that were seized from him pursuant to the four Arctic Haze search warrants in 2019 and 2020 to be returned to him.
A D.C. Superior Court grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Cole for the same two counts charged in the criminal complaint—18 U.S.C. 844(d) and 844(i).
This indictment has not been filed publicly but was presented to the judge yesterday.
2/5
Federal prosecutors using a local grand jury in this way is a new thing in DC. It came about thanks to the Trump Admin's push to neutralize criminal activity in the capital.
But the issue is currently before the Court of Appeals.
- The post-arrest interview was hours long and video recorded.
- "Over the next approximately one and one-half hours, the defendant walked the interviewing agents in detail through his construction, transportation, and planting of the pipe bombs."
- Brian Cole Jr "reset" or "wiped" his Samsung smartphone 943 times between December 2020 and December 2025.
- The pipe bombs "were viable explosive devices."
- FBI found pipe bomb components in Cole Jr's home and in his vehicle.
-"According to the defendant, 'no one knows' his political views, including his family."
- "He made the black powder in the devices using charcoal, Lilly Miller sulfur dust, and potassium nitrate that he purchased from Lowes."
- He "denied that his actions were directed toward Congress or related to the proceedings scheduled to take place on January 6."
- Motive: "he explained that 'something just snapped' after 'watching everything, just everything getting worse.' The defendant wanted to do something 'to the parties' because 'they were in charge.' 'I really don’t like either party at this point.'"
The most important takeaway from the filing:
The J5 pipe bombs had nothing to do with the events of J6.
None of the popular narratives about the pipe bombs and how they fit into either side's J6 story are correct.