Live Law Profile picture
Jan 7 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking court monitored investigation into audio recordings allegedly implicating former Manipur Chief Minister N Biren Singh in the state's ethnic violence.

Bench: Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Alok Aradhe. Image
NFSU Gandhinagar earlier informed the Court that the audio exhibits were tampered with and not scientifically fit for voice comparison, and therefore, no opinion on similarity or dissimilarity of the speakers could be offered.
livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
The petitioner has contended that the Manipur police forwarded only short edited clips to the NFSU, Gandhinagar instead of the complete 48 minute recording.
livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
Counsel for state seeks time to seek instructions.

Bench: If you did not forward entire recording then...
Advocate Prashant Bhushan: this matter has been listed on 10 occasions and government counsel has appeared every time. They are aware that in our petition itself we have placed the transcript of the 48 minute conversation on record and supplied the tape.
ASG Aishwarya Bhati: we got the full recording only after the last hearing. This was never served upon us. We kept on asking everyone.

Bhushan: They could have asked us, they appeared on 10 occasions before the court.
Bench: Why didn't you serve?

Bhushan: Formal notice was not there.

Bench: Now you send the entire recording.

Bhati: No difficulty.
Order: The entire 48 minutes of the conversation in question along with the admitted voice recordings of the former Manipur CM are available.
All the voice recordings furnished to the respondents by the learned counsel for the petitioner shall also be included therewith and forwarded to the National Forensic Science University Gandhinagar.
Order: NFSU to expedite the process and submit the report to this court in sealed cover.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Jan 9
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing today at 10.30 AM the #StrayDogs case

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria

For the past two days, the matter has been heard extensively, with the Bench primarily examining the issue of stray dogs in institutional premises

Intervenors (dog lovers and NGOs) are praying for modification of the Court's earlier directions, so that stray dogs are released in the same area from where they are picked up

They have suggested some scientific models, adoption of which can tackle dog population and eliminate dog bite incidents in a few years

Victims' side is arguing inter-alia for removal of stray dogs from residential complexes/housing societies.Image
Bench says it will be hearing the matter today till 11.55 AM

Sr Adv Mahalakshmi Pavani (for an animal rights activist): I want to highlight plight of women dog feeders...there are vigilantes harassing and beating women, attacking them

J Nath: Lodge an FIR, what stops you? It's a criminal offense

Pavani: Authorities are silent, that's like endorsing. In [...], 50 persons came in house, disrobed, attacked woman. Beat up her husband also

J Nath: We can't take care of individual cases. It's a law and order problem

Pavani: No FIRs are being registered.

#SupremeCourt #StrayDogs
Bench: Go to Magistrate or HC, there's Lalita Kumari judgment

Pavani: It's happening across the country! In Haryana, societies have hired bouncers...at one place, in 38 seconds, woman slapped so many times! Rampant illegal breeding of dogs happening

J Mehta: Nothing to do with stray dogs issues, if you have suggestions, you can give

Pavani: Due to import of foreign dogs, dogs are being abandoned as strays. People using derogatory statements for women, saying women sleep with dogs for satisfaction!

J Nath: People can use derogatory statements for anyone. Things are said about us also. Take action.

#StrayDogs
Read 13 tweets
Jan 8
Bombay High Court bids farewell to Justice Revati Mohite-Dere, who will be taking over the Office of Chief Justice, Meghalaya.

#BombayHighCourt #JusticeMohiteDere Image
Speaking at her farewell, J Mohite-Dere emphasised on the need of the Bar to "speak truth to power and stand for the voiceless" to keep up the legacy of the Bombay High Court.

J Mohite-Dere: To the Bar, I would like to say as lawyers, you have the responsibility to the Constitution... Responsibility to be the champions of justice and truth, so speak up fearlessly and advocate tirelessly, and stand unwaveringly for what is right...

#BombayHighCourt #JusticeMohiteDere
J Mohite-Dere: Your integrity and courage will leave a lasting impact on the society... the power to shape justice is in your hands... do not merely represent clients champion causes... Speak truth to power, challenge injustice and stand firmly for the voiceless... Your voice can make the difference between oppression and freedom.. be the change you seek to uphold and keep the proud legacy of the Bombay HC flying high as always...

#BombayHighCourt #JusticeMohiteDere
Read 6 tweets
Jan 8
#SupremeCourt hears Dr. Gitanjali Angmo's (@GitanjaliAngmo) plea challenging the detention of her husband and Ladakh social activist Sonam Wangchuk(@Wangchuk66), who has been detained under the National Security Act, 1980, after the recent Ladakh protests turned violent. Image
Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna Varale.

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for the petitioner.
Sibal: approximate causes that led to the detention order which is on 26th of September 2025 were four videos relied upon by the detaining authorities. These videos are dated 10th September 11 September 24 September and another one on 24th September.
Read 44 tweets
Jan 8
#SupremeCourt hears the issue of reservation for women in State Bar Council Elections

Sr Adv Shobha Gupta appearing for the petitioners Image
Gupta mentioned P&H HC Bar Council application

Gupta: the date is 10th Jan 2026 for the final electoral roll to be out

CJI: you are well in advance, we have issued notice today
A counsel tries to mention a plea through VC

CJI: no you sit and come and argue, ghar baithke maze kar rahe hai!
Read 5 tweets
Jan 8
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing today at 10.30 AM the #StrayDogs case

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria

Yesterday, the matter was heard extensively, with the Bench primarily examining the issue of stray dogs in institutional premises

It was questioned whether spaces such as courts, schools and hospitals should have canine presence at all

"Should people suffer because of the authorities' failure to comply with the ABC rules?" the Court askedImage
Link to a report on yesterday's hearing:

#SupremeCourt #StrayDogs

livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
Amicus Sr Adv Gaurav Aggarwal: Remaining 4 states have now filed their affidavits. 16 states are done, 7 are left. I will submit revised note

Sr Adv CU Singh: With regard to SOP of Animal Welfare Board, 4 big states have filed formal objections. It might be of relevance. Amicus may confirm...In Delhi, there is rodent and monkey menace also. What happens when there's abrupt removal of canines - rodent population shoot up. They are disease carriers. Canines maintain balance

J Mehta: Is there a correlation? In a lighter vein, dogs and cats are enemies. We should promote more cats, since they are enemies of rodents. We have not directed removal of every dog from street. They have to be treated as per rules

Singh: Let dogs be regulated in manner which has proved efficacious - sterilization and re-release in same area

J Mehta: How many dogs each hospital should have, tell us? beside each bed?

#SupremeCourt #StrayDogs
Read 17 tweets
Jan 8
#SupremeCourt to continue hearing a writ petition filed by Justice Yashwant Varma challenging the legality of the Parliamentary Committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, for inquiry over the discovery of unaccounted cash currencies at his official residence.

Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma

Yesterday, the Court was informed that the motion for impeachment was rejected by Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha.Image
For yesterday's proceedings, this thread can be followed:
Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra for Justice Varma: we have two similar worded proceedings before two co equal branches of the Parliament - the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. Same allegations same facts. The question is whether they can meet different fates. In one house fine but the moment they are in both houses...
Read 61 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(