I think a lot of radicalization happens in spaces where it’s all talk. Everything is hypothetical. It’s easy to larp as a revolutionary, as someone who stands against oppression. There’s a lack of seriousness about it all. You start to believe the memes. You start to believe you’re a hero, you’re the main character. Then you convince yourself to do something really dumb, like pull your car in front of police officers. They draw their guns and the larp crumbles, you’re not that person, this is real life and those are real guns. Nothing but get the hell out of here screams in her brain. She probably didn’t see the officer standing in front of her car as she smashes the gas.
The officers can’t know this of course. They don’t know what she’s thinking they just know when guns were drawn asking her to step out of her vehicle she slammed in the gas on the direction of an officer. They’re not in a Larp. Their job is real and they encounter people who want to kill them. So they fire.
No one in this woman’s life told her she’s on a retarded destructive larp. She was encouraged by her peer group. Viral videos of similarly lost radical larpers getting nothing but praise online. Politicians calling the enforcement of our laws akin to Nazis, calling them illegitimate, calling them evil. Telling their citizens to make their voices heard. Everyone in her life failed her. She needed someone to tell her to grow up. Instead she had no one and now she’s dead.
A horrible case of internet radicalization.
There won’t be any long NYT articles about the dangers of online radicalization of women. Even though they consume endless far left propaganda and start parroting genuinely insane racial bigotry, and start attacking LEOs. Even though we have the studies showing the massive swing in left wing politics women have. Even though they were the only group to reliably vote left in the last few elections. There will be no discussion about their endless TikTok political slop.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There’s a funny inverse they do here. Inherent in right wing ideology is the emphasized importance on starting a family, joining a church, becoming the type of person that can support a family and help in a church. They ask, well what are you doing from the top down? It’s an incoherent question, because a government official can’t force you to grow to become a father or provider. He can however, take money from providers and give them to people who are not fulfilling their duties to their communities.
Again the causation is all backwards. I clean my community by keeping my property and surrounding area clean. It’s a daily effort on my part to uphold my duties to my neighbors.
We continue the confused thoughts by claiming actively cleaning and looking after your property is doing nothing. I’ve done my part, you demand the collective step in and do your part.
The defendant has endless petty crimes as well. Driving without a license, giving false name to police, assaulting officers, possessing weapons as a felon, and lots of parole violations. What would possibly posses the judge to let this man back onto the streets?
Hoyos was appointed by governor Mark Dayton, who should answer for this as well.
When you pay attention you quickly realize how many of their arguments are disputes about framing disguised as disputes about facts.
“White flight” was a response to the crime wave American cities saw in the 1960s-1990s. Libs are taught this was white america being racist fleeing from black neighbors as segregation was formally ended. Point out that what the whites fleeing the cities really didn’t like was the violent crime and their governments inability or unwillingness to stop this crime, and they will start calling you names. You’ve recast their narrative’s illogical hateful villains as not only pragmatic reasonable citizens, but as victims.
You can throw a stone into any American conflict and hit some sacred cow that justifies the progressive hatred of this country and her people. By simply explaining the point of view of the villainized, exactly as they would have explained themself, the progressive reacts in horror.
“How can you say that? My Zinn inspired history book said the opposite!” This is when the insults come raining down.
Ask any of these guys why they moved to a nice neighborhood and they’ll say, ohh it’s safe, the schools are nice etc etc etc… then ask them why grandma and grandpa moved to their neighborhood to start a family and it’s, “ohh they just hated black people.” Like really? That’s what you honestly think? It’s just silly.
It’s a completely unexamined line given to them by authority figures when they were too young to recognize communist subversion.
In 1862 during the civil war the Sioux used the opportunity to attack undefended frontier settlements. They killed nearly 400 men women and children. They took as hostages 300 women and children. They drove some 30,000 settlers off their land.
The military took time to rally enough troops to respond amidst the civil war. When they did, they killed some 150 natives and captured hundreds more. The freed the hostages and hanged the leaders of the attack in one of the largest mass executions in U.S. history; 18 in total. Part of the unconditional surrender of the Sioux was moving westward, away from the border they attacked.
20 years later a Sioux cult emerged. The belief that Jesus Christ had returned to earth as an Indian. The Sioux believed he had returned to cleanse the land of the white man and would restore the lives of the Indians that had fallen. The cult developed a ritual known as the ghost dance, which included a black shirt many Sioux believed to be bullet proof.
The ghost dance was a prayer, a prayer of genocide. A prayer that the white man would be exterminated. It spread to every Sioux tribe.
Given the history of unprovoked attacks on undefended settlements this call to genocide was taken seriously by the citizens living near the Sioux. They pled with the government to take action.
The U.S. ordered the Sioux to disarm, turning over their fire arms. During the disarmament members of the tribe started performing the ghost dance. Soldiers were on edge. One Sioux refused to turn over his rifle firing at the soldiers. Several others revealed hidden guns beneath their cloaks and began firing on the soldiers. Unarmed tribesmen garbed in their “bullet proof” shirts grabbed blunt objects and axes and struck at the nearest soldier. The army opened fire. It was chaos. There were mass casualties on both sides.
The Sioux lost. They were forced further back from civilization. They were never able to fulfill their prayer of white genocide.
Thank God our government did not allow a band of genocidal tribesman to exist near our borders. Our world is a better place for removing that threat.
Think about the insane amount of social conditioning that it took to make people ignore the sacrifice your ancestors made to protect you from a genocidal threat, while sympathizing with the genocidal threat.
Ok, I guess I’ll give you an opportunity to be smug. The study he’s referencing is only looking at tech start ups. The h1b process is fairly complicated, so I believe the study is measuring something else. It’s measuring the logistical competence of start up companies. Its measure of success wasn’t revenue or patents, but IPO and VC investment. What makes these early companies attractive to investors? The corporate logistical structure to handle complex legal and administrative tasks is good indicator they’re a serious player. This has nothing to do with the HIB employees they hire.
Now there are other studies that actually focus on existing firms and the impact of H1B workers. They find modest to no impact on revenue or patent filling, they find that the hiring crowds out native applicants, and most importantly they find hiring prices down workers wages. Which is exactly what opponents of H1B visas argue.
At a certain point you have to be willing to say, hey, those guys who dismissed this out of hand were right. They’re often right, what keeps making them right?
From the people who brought you “Did you know women are paid 77 on the dollar compared to men?” “Did you know black employees make firms better?” “Did you know firms with more women execs are more profitable?” Bring you “did you know foreigners are better hires than natives?”