We need to talk about the new @Dawn_French “comedy” series that implies that infection control is a joke.
This is a serious issue, particularly for Clinically Vulnerable people who remain at increased risk, and we are not laughing. 1/
In the first episode, a GP appears in a dramatic “protective outfit” and face shield, and we’re told it’s because “since Covid” they’ve developed “very, very, very bad health anxiety.”
2/
Then the doctor refuses to get close to the patient, barely touches a wrist, and incorrectly declares them dead.
It invites audiences to mock precautions (during the current flu wave) and suggests that doctors who take measures are less competent.
3/
Firstly:
If Covid was her concern, then a face shield, coveralls, and gloves are not appropriate protective measures.
She really needs an FFP3 mask (as modeled here at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry).
4/
Secondly:
During the height of the pandemic, even vulnerable doctors still did their jobs, under extreme pressure and risk, using appropriate PPE (where available, despite systemic challenges), and with professionalism.
Plenty of people still need precautions now. Not because they are “hysterical,” but because one infection can result in serious consequences. Safety isn’t a punchline.
6/
And yes:
Real health anxiety exists and deserves compassion. But the scene weaponises “health anxiety” to ridicule precautions - harming people struggling with anxiety and people with genuine clinical vulnerability.
7/
The BBC took a long time to identify the blatant discrimination in 'Little Britain' and 'Come Fly with Me'.
Please ask:
Are you institutionally failing to recognise discrimination when the target is Clinically Vulnerable people?
- Fuelling stigma and denying safe care. 8/
Public service broadcasting should not be normalising contempt for basic protections - especially when respiratory infections are a real risk for many.
9/
We’re asking the BBC to:
• acknowledge the harm of this portrayal
• review editorial decisions around clinical vulnerability and IPC
• involve Clinically Vulnerable consultants
• stop using PPE in the context of "health anxiety"
10/
PLEASE complain to the BBC:
Can You Keep a Secret?
Series 1: Episode 1
7/1/26
This scene stigmatises Clinically Vulnerable people, misrepresents infection control as irrational, and undermines trust in healthcare.
If you value our work at the C○vid Inquiry and beyond, your continued support is vital.
1/
It is hard to explain how much effort has gone in over the past few years to raise understanding and awareness of issues amplified the emerge of C○vid.
2/
We have participated in NICE as stakeholders and the inquiry as Core Participants (as the only group representing Clinically Vulnerable people).
📉📊 We have collected evidence as data and thousands of 💬 impact statements from people.
Their response dodges the point.
Because the problem really wasn’t that “I didn’t get the joke”.
The problem is who the joke is aimed at and what it encourages most people to laugh at.
2/
If the punchline is “PPE / precautions = anxious / ridiculous” then people who still need precautions (Clinically Vulnerable people) are the collateral damage.
🧵 This autumn the UKHSA is rightly worried, as 'flu is a real risk...
TLDR:
Clinically Vulnerable people ALL need 'flu vaccines + antivirals this year (if symptomatic or exposed) + confused infection control guidance.
If you are Clinically Vulnerable, please read on...
1/
This year's strains aren't looking good:
The infections have started earlier.
A(H3N2) strains are dominant - and linked to worse outcomes.
A shifted strain (slightly different to vaccines) is also doing the rounds.
2/
If you have been invited for a vaccine, or live with a Clinically Vulnerable person (but don't qualify) please consider getting a vaccine - they can be as cheap as £9.95.
Everyone benefits from 'flu vaccines and children (up to 16) are offered them for free in school.