The Left cannot simultaneously demand a multi-trillion-dollar debt-fueled centralized mega-government, and insist that left-wing activists can ignore federal laws they don't like, and violently interfere with law enforcement.
If we all want to have a big bipartisan national conversation about dramatically reducing the size and funding of the federal government and devolving more of its power to the states, I'll be happy to brew the coffee.
But I have to warn the Left: border security will absolutely remain one of the core responsibilities of even the smallest imaginable federal government, and Democrats WILL be required to obey those laws. No rational government can work any other way.
Now, if the Left wants to zero out almost all federal funding, so that state taxpayers finance everything in their states, then we can talk about letting idiots vote for crooks who will help foreign gangs rob them blind. A regrettable decision, but no longer a federal issue.
But we absolutely will not have a government that exercises gigantic powers over law-abiding, hard-working, taxpaying Americans, seizing much of their income in taxes, while allowing foreign criminals, corrupt Democrat politicians, and deranged activists to subvert its authority.
We also absolutely reject the notion that the authority of the titanic federal government is only legitimate when Democrats are in charge. This is a core principle of fascism - the Party is the source of all power - and the American people should reject it utterly.
If you really want a taste of true, hardcore fascism, that's how you get it: a permanent Party apparatus that claims the first loyalty of its members, above and beyond the nation and its people, with power that transcends law and elections.
If we're going to have a massive centralized government, it must be bound by the Constitution and elections. We cannot allow one Party or its special interests to simply ignore government authority, the law, and even the needs of public safety on a whim. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Democrat Party is many things: massive money-laundering operation, domestic terrorist organization, agent of hostile foreign powers, authoritarian, subversive. It has ceased to be a functioning part of American democracy in any meaningful sense.
The Democrat Party claims it has the right to use violence to nullify laws it does not like. We, the patriotic people of the United States of America, formally reject this claim, wholly and without reservation.
The Democrats claim their political violence is the fault of the victims who refused to submit to their demands. This is the catechism of terrorism - the blood is on your hands for resisting us. We, the American people, reject this doctrine and will hold Democrats accountable.
Here's a great example of why political violence is popular: let's say you believe America should have open borders and unlimited migration. You organize with like-minded people and hold a few big rallies. You feel like you're leading an unstoppable crusade.
But then the election happens, and you get crushed at the ballot box, because most Americans do not want open borders. You won't even make it to the election, because few candidates from any party want to ride your policy platform down to doom like Slim Pickens on the H-bomb.
So instead, you embrace totalitarianism and political violence. Your political party decides that immigration laws it doesn't like are null and void, by the imperial fiat of the Party, and should not be enforced. You begin using physical force to obstruct enforcement.
The Democrats' embrace of political violence is a natural outgrowth of the Party's descent into contempt-signaling as its primary mode of communication. The fastest and most exhilarating way to express utter contempt of the "wrong" people is to deny their right to live.
Wishing death upon people is the fastest way to dehumanize them. Left-wing social media is filled with people competing to show how much they loathe the Democrat Party's enemies and hate fetishes. The fastest way to win that competition is with lurid death wishes.
This has been going on in Democrat circles for years, but it accelerated during the pandemic, when it became fashionable to say the Wrong People should die of COVID. Remember Joe Biden's Winter of Death? And Biden fantasizing about the military slaughtering gun owners?
So private companies must be forced to continue employing people who tell verifiable lies and cause massive public outrage? Does that apply to people from all political parties, or just one? Does the company have to keep paying the liar after he drives them out of business?
Does anybody want to try telling me that if a right-wing on-air personality stated, as a matter of fact, that Charlie Kirk's killer was a paid agent of the Democrat Party who reported directly to Chuck Schumer, that you'd all be demanding he keep his job?
Under what legal authority do we force private companies to continue employing those who have been fired for cause? Who gets to decide which speakers are unfireable? Many victims of real cancel culture were fired for things they didn't even say on the platform that employed them.
There is no need to listen to anyone whose "condemnation" of Charlie Kirk's murder includes "both sides" rhetoric. They're not really condemning anything. They're spinning, attempting to control the damage to the Left, and trying to score a few cheap political points.
"Both-sides-ism" is merely a permutation of the standard formula for political terrorism, which involves blaming the victim for the violence perpetrated against them. If you submit to our grievances, we won't have to kill you. Therefore, the violence is your fault.
Both-sides-ism is just a slightly less brutish statement of this idea. Too bad one of ours murdered one of yours, but it's really kind of your fault for criticizing us in harsh terms and failing to show deference to our agenda. You're as much to blame as we are - maybe more!
None of the grief, anger, fear, or resolve you are feeling after the assassination of Charlie Kirk will make a long-term difference if the Left still controls institutions and the bureaucracy and the Democrat Party is still powerful. Be ready to march on the ballot box.
Nothing that's happened so far has taught Democrats any lessons or convinced them to moderate their behavior. They're already returning to eliminationist, Nazi, and "resistance" rhetoric a week after they inspired a murderer. This party cannot be reformed.
Democrat media is already trying to write a new narrative that the killer and his boyfriend were the real victims here, tragic star-crossed lovers driven to extremes by the homophobic, transphobic, everything-phobic conservative society Charlie Kirk represented.