Just Human Profile picture
Jan 14 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🧵Looks like someone, perhaps more than one person, got caught with their hand in the TS/SCI cookie jar. Image
United States v. Perez-Lugones

1 count of 18 USC 793(e)

Retention of National Defense Information

Might see that more charges added (probably will) Image
Perez-Lugones is former US Navy, working as a govt contractor since 2002, has a TS/SCI clearance.

He is a sys admin for a a company that contracts to a gov't agency and whose workplace is within another government contracting company.

He has access to classified information as part of his job.Image
But only as needed. He is not authorized to access classified information whenever he wants to. Image
In October of 2025, Perez-Lugones searched classified databases for intelligence reports.

He found them. He took a screenshot. Saved that screenshot as "Microsoft Word - Document 1" and printed it. Image
"Notably"

When you see "notably" in docs like this followed by a mundane detail...

It's foreshadowing. Image
See? Told ya.
:) Image
Perez-Lugones was not authorized to do any of this. Image
And his activity was monitored.

His employer was able to examine his printing activity and see that he had printed "classified and sensitive reports."

Plural. Image
Image
January 5, 2026

(this is immediately after the Maduro raid...)

Perez-Lugones decided to start journaling about all the secret information he was viewing in a SCIF at work.

He then removed the pages from his workplace and took them home. Image
Bruh Image
He continued engaging in this activity over the next several days. Image
January 8, 2026

Court-authorized searches are conducted at the Perez-Lugones home, in his vehicle, "and other locations."

Hmm... wonder what the "other locations" are. Might just be his office, but I would think they would say that. Image
Investigators find classified documents in Perez-Lugones' basement and in his lunchbox.

Bruh. Image
Perez-Lugones was taken into custody on January 9, 2026.

He was initially given a bond and pretrial release BUT the order was STAYED pending an appeal by DOJ, which they filed on January 13, 2026.

He's still in custody. DOJ argues he is a national security risk because he has accessed and knows so much classified/sensitive information.

Affidavit
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

DOJ appeal
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Now, relatedly...

This also just happened.

The home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson has been searched in connection to this case. Image
Image
So her home might be the "other places" that were mentioned in the probable cause affidavit for Perez-Lugones. Image
I took a look at Natanson's recent reporting.

Since at least November 11, 2025, she has had a focus on one nation: Venezuela.

So I think it is a possibility that Country-1 from the affidavit is Venezuela.

Can't be 100% on that, but it's possible.
archive.is/dwcEj
She also published a story on Christmas Eve about how many sources she suddenly had.

archive.is/mkrk7Image
Natanson was at home during the search. Her devices were taken.

According to the Washington Post, "Investigators told Natanson that she is not the focus of the probe."

And I'm sure that's true, at least at this time. Image
But... if investigators find evidence that she encouraged, requested, or otherwise was involved in Perez-Lugones fetching the national defense information that he is at this time charged with retaining... the focus may evolve.

I can't help but note Kash's word choice here.Image
Arrest of Defense Contractor Leads to Search of WaPo Journalist's Home and Seizure of Devices

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Jan 16
"The meeting came a day after President Trump spoke to Ms. Rodríguez on the phone and on the same day he met with María Corina Machado, the leader of Venezuela’s opposition and a Nobel laureate." Image
After months of infiltration into the country and the government in Venezuela by CIA operators and just a couple weeks after one of the most extraordinary joint military operations in the history of the world (which could not have happened without the CIA's work pre-raid), the Director of the CIA just strolled into Caracas and told the the communist regime,

"The United States looks forward to an improved working relationship."

That's baller.Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 13
🧵United States v. Maduro

Some confusion, or silliness, over who represents Maduro played out recently.

Barry Pollack initially filed as counsel for Maduro. Image
The next day, Bruce Fein filed as counsel for Maduro Image
But Pollack quickly informed the court that Fein was NOT counsel to Maduro, and no one authorized him to speak to Maduro or represent him in any way.

Also says he tried to contact Fein and got no response. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 8
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

It appears that defendant Brian J. Cole Jr. will be RELEASED FROM CUSTODY due to DOJ's failure to file a valid federal indictment by Dec 30, 2025.

Charges are not dismissed.
Arraignment on the new indictment is set for tomorrow. Image
It seems Judge Amir H. Ali accepted the defense's argument, summarized here👇 Image
The charges are not dismissed.

Cole will be arraigned tomorrow (and probably put back in custody). Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 6
🧵United States v. Carvajal-Barrios
(Maduro Narco-Terrorism Conspiracy Case)

Thread on case background and related cases. Image
Nicolás Maduro Moros. Image
The case against Maduro, titled U.S. v. Carvajal-Barrios, is not a new one.

It was first brought in March of 2011.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 2
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

Prosecutors will seek a superseding indictment against Cole, this time from a federal grand jury, next week. Image
At the detention hearing on Dec 30, we learned that prosecutors had a 2-count indictment against Cole from a "local grand jury," meaning one empaneled by the Superior Court of the District of Columbia—not one empaneled by the federal court.

This method of getting an indictment is currently under review at the Court of Appeals.

Read 5 tweets
Jan 2
🧵United States v. Cole
(J5 Pipe Bomber case)

Defendant Brian J. Cole, Jr. to remain in custody pending trial. Image
"According to the government’s proffer in support of detention, its investigation pointed to Mr. Cole for at least the following reasons:" Image
More reasons for continued detention Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(