Mike Fragoso Profile picture
Jan 15 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Why did the Federal Judicial Center put out a publication that, essentially, says fossil-fuel manufacturers should lose climate cases? Why did Elena Kagan write a forward to it? Did they tell Congress this was coming? The impropriety and irresponsibility are staggering. 1/4
As Congress considers the FSGG appropriations, Republicans should ask the FJC why they quietly published a new edition of their "reference manual" for scientific evidence that is so biased it would make Al Gore blush. 2/4
An organizer of the project--David Tatel--said at the outset that the goal is to convince "climate skeptic" judges to take a different view. Why did the FJC think this was its job? 3/4
Congressional Republicans should demand that that the FJC rescind this absurd publication before it does real damage to the judiciary's credibility in Congress. Article below. 4/4

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Fragoso

Mike Fragoso Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mike_frags

Nov 2, 2025
Here’s the thing: SNAP’s authorization has lapsed. So even if the $3b (or however many billion the Judge from Motley Rice thinks) exists, the program requiring its expenditure does not. 1/9
They don’t cover this in School House Rock but how a bill becomes a law happens twice for a government program: first when the program is authorized and second when it’s funded via appropriations. McConnell is assuming this is all about approps but it’s actually both. 2/9
Is there money in a contingency fund? Sure, probably. At minimum there’s $3b available through 09/2026. Maybe there’s another $3b available through 09/2027 but none of that necessarily matters. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Oct 26, 2025
At the outset of the current Trump administration, I had an op-ed in the WSJ on how law firms who terrorized the Trump 1 were signaling their Trump savvy to clients. I explained why that was a joke. Well, in today’s WaPo it seems some firms got the message. 1/12 Image
Much of my piece involved how Biglaw gave Trump 1 alumni the cold shoulder, but I also discussed how Biglaw’s pro-bono industrial complex had fielded an army against Trump 1 and might do the same this time. 2/12 Image
Of course none of this is free—it’s cross-subsidized by the paying clients. I wondered if it’s really in those paying clients’ interests, under Republican government, to be represented by institutionalized Democrat impact litigation shops. 3/12 Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 8, 2025
The Planned Parenthood TRO is probably the most insane judicial action this administration. A TRO directing an appropriation in the face of enacted statute is like Michelangelo-level resistance. Some have argued SCOTUS should reassign the case and there’s a lot to that. 1/x
There’s a fascinating article on reassignment from the Stanford Law Review. It starts with a famous sentencing case where CA2 reassigned a case because the trial judge was both resisting and evading review. (Sound familiar?) 2/x Image
It turns out reassignment isn’t some esoteric phenomenon. Every circuit asserts the power to do it. 3/x Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 6, 2025
Jeff Flake gave my my start in politics and for that I’m grateful, but his commentary keeps missing the mark. Bc he’s not really in the game anymore he misinterprets what happened to Tillis, gives flawed advice, and downplays the threat of Democrats. 🧵1/21
Let’s start with TT. As I’ve said before in this context, it’s just not right to say that he refused to cling to Trump to win a primary. His problem was that Trump and Leadership wouldn’t let him move center *on policy* for the general election. 2/21
This simply isn’t JF’s morality tale. Maybe TT will convert it into such a tale in the coming months? But that would be unwise. The eternal morality play puts you on JF’s trajectory; the process/policy story on Sinema’s. Knowing TT, he’d prefer the latter. 3/21
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(