Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Stephen Barlow Profile picture
@SteB777
Jan 19 • 16 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
'Trump sent a letter to Norway’s prime minister Jonas Gahr Støre telling him that “considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace.”'

1/🧵theguardian.com/world/live/202…
Trump was never interested in peace, and the liar never stopped 8 wars, he just falsely claimed he did. All because of his demented racist hatred of Barack Obama, and he got something Trump will never have, a Nobel Peace Prize.
2/
Trump is America's very own Caligula or Nero for the modern age, a mad wannabe Emperor of a non-existent empire, making lunatic pronouncements, and he should be in a lunatic asylum for the criminally insane - for public protection.
3/
Most of these lunatic emperors in history, from Nero, Caligula, Napoleon, Hitler etc, were relatively young compared to Trump, who might have realistically ruled over their envisaged empires for some time. Whereas Trump is a rancid old senile octogenarian, in poor health.
4/
This is the extra dimension to this lunatic, power mad, wannabe emperor, and that he is never going to see his imaginary empire, because he'll either be dead, or so senile, he won't know or remember anything.
5/
Trump has got where he is, playing on the racist, white supremacist, sentiment, which has run through America, since Manifest Destiny, in the 19th Century. But Trump is just a conman, he doesn't really have a coherent vision, he just pretends to.

6/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_…
As I've explained before, Trump's bubble of right wing populism, is about to pop and implode. MAGA are already fighting like ferrets in a sack, and when MAGA voters wake up to find no healthcare for them, rising food prices and climate change, this bubble will burst.
7/
As all the other right wing leaders of the world have pinned themselves to Trump, they will implode with him. Who knows exactly how it'll end with rancid old Trump's demise, his descent into senile madness, or ripped apart by his own supporter base. But it will end, soon.
8/
It cannot carry on. This third term fantasy is just that. Trump is already visibly rotting in front of our eyes, so even if somehow he gets to the end of this term, he will be a decrepit, ranting senile lunatic, that not even his most fanatical supporters can believe in.
9/
Nor will it continue with anyone else, because this whole far right vision, is incoherent and based on one lie piled on top of another. Climate change is real and getting worse, and they have bet the house on climate change denial.
10/
Their vision of a white supremacy society, is just a joke, a Walmart vision, of Nazi pseudo-science, another con job. This economic miracle Trump has been selling, will be revealed as the Emperor's clothes, and that Trump is butt naked.
11/
The oligarch/billionaires behind Trump and modern fascism, with their unrealistic visions of control, flying to Mars and AI, and their own climate change denial, will turn people against them. It will not end well for them.
12/
There is no realistic future vision, just a pile of incoherent, unrealistic fantasy. It has a very limited time span, because climate change and ecological unsustainably will call time on this fantasy. They are at base, all conmen.
13/
It always ends badly for conmen, selling a lie. How long did Hitler's thousand year Reich last? Barely over 10 years. Napoleon's reign didn't last long. None of these lunatic visions of megalomaniacs lasted long.
14/
Given Trump's age, health, both mental and physical, it's going to be an even shorter journey than most of history's megalomaniacs.

Fantasists and conmen, the lot of them.
15/
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 8
I want to commend this post, because it is what I have been trying unsuccessfully to get across for decades. Up until the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, climate change had been treated, as only part of a much bigger ecological crisis. The big picture.
1/🧵
The reason climate change was separated from the test of the ecological crisis, was it was wrongly thought that there would be a quick agreement, on phasing out fossil fuels, as had happened, with CFCs causing the hole in the ozone layer, at the Montreal Protocol in 1987.
2/
However, with hindsight, it has become clear, that plotting politicians only did this, at the behest of fossil fuel companies, to they could invent climate change denial, which never existed, in 1992, then to falsely claim that the only problem was climate change.
3/
Read 19 tweets
Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 7
The reason I am getting very frustrated about this, is that this is the single biggest danger facing humanity. That there is a complete failure to understand how no one has ever investigated how biodiversity and natural ecosystems, sustain our society.
1/🧵
Everyone, including most senior scientists, just seem to assume:

1) That science, and experts understand how natural systems sustain our societies/civilization.

2) How stable and resilient our societies/civilization, will be to the collapse of these natural systems.

2/
This is because of an entirely false assumption, in modern Western culture, that our societies/civilization, somehow exist, independent of natural systems (biodiversity, ecosystems, the climate).
3/
Read 21 tweets
Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 6
Hi Caroline, I agree, if the report has been redacted, the full version should be made available. However, as I have been trying to explain to @GreenRupertRead the thinness of the report, is not really due to redaction, and anyone with insight, should know that this is as serious as it gets.

However, the real problem, is that there is absolutely no field of expertise here, no field of science, no institute studying this, no experts, that could tell you what this actually means for our societies/civilization.

I'm a graduate in scientific ecology, I have spent over 30 years investigating this, and trying to alert people to the fact, that there is no field of science, no institute, and no experts, who know what this actually means for our societies, because absolutely no one is studying.

Everyone, including scientists, wrongly assumes there are experts and research on this, but there are none. I have challenged leading scientists, to point to who is doing the research, and where, and none can tell me.

I am being so totally ignored on this, that I feel like giving up, and I have vastly more education and insight into this, than those ignoring me, and stonewalling me.

I will put a peer reviewed paper, in the tweet below, that absolutely proves, that absolutely no one is studying the threat to our civilization, which the climate and ecological crisis poses. Talk about denial. Well, just wait until you start starving to death, and remember I did warn you about it.
threadreaderapp.com/thread/2018757…
1/2
This should be the biggest story in the world today. If anyone states billions could starve to death, in the not so distant future, a lot of techno-optimist climate scientists will come along, and falsely accuse you of being alarmist, because there is no scientific evidence, that says climate change, poses this sort of risk to our societies.

Actually, they are right that there is no scientific evidence, the climate change could collapse our civilization. But that's because:

1) There's no research at all into the resilience of our societies/civilization, to climate/ecological shocks. So of course there's no science to support these concerns.

2) Secondly, the threat to us is from a combination of biodiversity and ecological collapse (which climate scientists are not qualified to comment on) and climate change. No one is researching the combined impact of both. There is no field of science that studies this.

Scientific ecology, only studies the interaction of populations of non-human organisms, with the natural environment, including climate change. It deliberately excludes humans, and human society. I know, because I'm a graduate in it.

The main reason this is not studied, is the complexity, which is many more magnitudes greater than anything else humanity studied. But just because it is complex, doesn't mean we should be ignoring it, as our lives depend on it, and there could be mass starvation in the near future, if we do not get real.
pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
2/2
PS. - For crying out loud, will someone please respond to this, and stop ignoring what I am saying, just because it is too complex for you to understand. I don't mind people disagreeing with me, calling me an alarmist, if only they will support why they are saying this, with references and evidence. Stop the denial. We can avert catastrophe, if only we investigate this and acknowledge the problem.

I am not a doomer. I am saying we can avert catastrophe, if only we first investigate the situation, and it will be discovered that what I am saying is true. Secondly, upon this realization, we not only totally change our system, but abandon artificially induced competitive, induced for economic growth, and switch to a cooperative system, which would avoid total system collapse, as people would work together, not against each other.

I will not let anyone pretend that they are really concerned about the ecological and climate crisis, until they acknowledge this situation. Otherwise, you are just trying to look good.

As I say, if people dispute what I say, and try to claim I am wrong and don't know what I am talking about, support your point. But every time someone has tried in well over 30 years, I totally destroy their arguments, and they have to concede, that what I am saying is correct. But then they just go quiet, and don't want to discuss it.
Read 4 tweets
Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 5
"Flawed economic models mean climate crisis could crash global economy, experts warn"

@ProfSteveKeen has been pointing out the flaws in William Nordhaus fatally flawed DICE model for a very long time. They should now give that prize to Steve Keen.

1/🧵theguardian.com/environment/20…
I have been pointing out that the climate crisis will crash the global economy, for over 3 decades. However, I lacked @ProfSteveKeen economics expertise, to explain why, in economic terms. My analysis was derived from ecology and systems theory.
2/
It was only when I read @ProfSteveKeen systematic demolition of William Nordhaus' intellectually dishonest DICE model, that I realized why governments had been. misled to believe the impacts of climate change on our system, would be slight.
3/
Read 6 tweets
Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Feb 3
I'm making a very serious point here. The way natural ecosystems and biodiversity, support our societies and economies, has never been systematically studied, despite us destroying the natural systems our lives depend on, and no one is the slightest bit interested in that?
1/3
Very few people, almost no one, is aware of what I'm saying here. Most people, including most scientists, wrongly assume somewhere it's known, how natural ecosystems and biodiversity sustain us. That there is expertise in this. But where is it? The cat got your tongue?
2/3
In my lifetime of investigating this, the only people I've come across who truly understand the total unsustainability of our modern systems, and how natural ecosystems and biodiversity sustain us, are indigenous cultures. Our culture seems free of this insight.
3/3
Read 4 tweets
Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Jan 31
I wrote a thread on the ecological impacts to our societies, explaining climate change was just one small, but very significant part of those ecological impacts. Remember, in 2024, UK farming suffered big losses in yield, because of rain.

1/🧵theguardian.com/news/ng-intera…
This was the thread I wrote, and without a huge amount of words, I can only partially explain what I was getting at. That we need to urgently develop a holistic, joined up way of thinking, who understand all these serious challenges we face as a whole.

2/
There are 2 very different ways of looking at the increased flooding we are experiencing in the UK, and other parts of the world. The first is to look at it as a singular problem, in terms of specifics of flood engineering. This is relevant, but only part of it.
3/
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(