The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Jan 21 30 tweets 12 min read Read on X
This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.

“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”

Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.

So, what happened?

Screens.

Dr. Jared Horvath explained:

“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”

“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”

“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”

But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.

They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty. 🧵
This isn’t a glitch.

Engagement-driven algorithms don’t understand meaning, context, or childhood development. They only understand clicks and watch time driven by dopamine spikes.

So when AI is tasked with churning out videos at scale, it doesn’t filter for innocence—it optimizes for stimulation.

Cartoon imagery masking adult themes, fear cues, violence, and psychological distress is being served to toddlers. Bright colors on the surface. Something very, very wrong underneath.

This content has zero educational or developmental value. No story. No moral arc. No learning. Just rapid-fire novelty engineered to hold attention at all costs—even if that cost is literally the viewer’s brain and nervous system development.

Dopamine-optimized media and AI-generated slop are conditioning our children for addiction, emotional dysregulation, and long-term neurological harm.

We have to stop this before it starts—and before Big Pharma steps in with the “solution.”
Something unprecedented and highly concerning is happening to children’s brains.

Toddlers aren’t just watching screens—they’re being neurologically conditioned by them.

Rapid cuts, flashing colors, constant novelty.

And none of it is by accident. It is all by design.

What looks like “kid’s content” is often dopamine engineering aimed at maximizing engagement, not healthy development, no matter the damage it does.Image
Parents see the patterns.

Their young children are calm while watching shows—but when the screen turns off, they melt down.

They’re not just upset it’s over. It’s much bigger than that.

Rage. Desperation. And tantrums that feel disproportionate.

A 2025 survey found 22% of parents report “full-on tantrums” from excessive screen time, along with irritability and mood swings.

Many parents say it’s worse than sugar crashes and harder to manage than hunger or fatigue.

That’s not coincidence. That’s withdrawal.

Unfortunately, 25% of parents use screens to calm children when upset and 17% report children self-soothing with mobile devices.Image
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…
Fast-paced children’s programming trains the brain to expect constant stimulation.

When attention is conditioned to jump every few seconds, slower real-world experiences—reading, conversation, imagination, boredom—become intolerable.

The developing nervous system adapts by chasing novelty instead of building focus.

Unfortunately, this rewiring doesn’t fade on its own.Image
Classic children’s shows were fundamentally different.

They were slower. Predictable. Repetitive. On purpose. They left space for emotional processing and imagination.

Modern programming does the opposite—relentless stimulation with no pauses, optimized through analytics to keep kids locked in.

The brain learns whatever it practices most. Especially in young children.Image
And the research backs it up.

Early exposure to fast-paced media is linked to later attention problems, impaired executive function, emotional dysregulation, and increased anger.

And each additional hour compounds the effect. The younger the brain, the deeper the imprint.

This isn’t just about “screen time.” It’s about screen design.

So why are addictive and harmful YouTube shows like Cocomelon allowed to exist?Image
@MidwesternDoc This isn’t about bad parenting or weak discipline.

The mechanics of how dopamine hijacks attention—especially in children—are deeply unsettling.

@MidwesternDoc's full article connects dots most people never see.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…
Many parents are relying on screens to calm distressed children.

It works short-term because dopamine overrides discomfort.

But long-term, it teaches the nervous system that relief comes from external stimulation—not self-regulation.

The child becomes dependent on artificial soothing.

That’s bad. Really, really bad.

And that dependency follows them into adolescence, where it can affect everything from school and work to relationships.Image
This pattern directly mirrors addiction.

Remove the stimulus and distress surges. Reintroduce it and calm returns.

Over time, baseline satisfaction drops, and stronger stimulation is needed to achieve the same effect.

Children aren’t choosing this. Their brains are being trained into it.

They’re being set up for a life of challenges just because someone wants to profit from the attention of a toddler.Image
Platforms profit from attention, regardless of the age of the viewer.

Algorithms reward whatever keeps eyes glued longest.

Developmental health isn’t the metric—engagement is.

And children are uniquely vulnerable because their brains are still wiring reward pathways.

Profit and protection aren’t aligned.Image
But this isn’t just an issue during childhood.

A nervous system conditioned to constant dopamine spikes struggles with delayed gratification, deep focus, emotional resilience, and stable joy.

It seeks intensity instead of meaning, stimulation instead of presence.

The groundwork for lifelong dissatisfaction is being laid earlier than ever before.Image
@MidwesternDoc This isn’t just about screens.

It’s about how a dopamine-driven world that is quietly shaping what joy, attention, and connection even feel like. And it’s starting in early childhood.

We have to do something before it’s too late.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…
Children are paying the highest price. But that doesn’t mean adults are immune to this.

When the nervous system is constantly overstimulated, subtler pleasures disappear—completely.

Quiet becomes uncomfortable. Stillness feels empty. Real relationships feel dull compared to engineered highs.

That gap drives further consumption and more disconnection from the real world.Image
A healthy nervous system resists addiction.

When regulation, safety, and connection are intact, artificial stimulation loses its grip. Dopamine spikes become unnecessary instead of irresistible.

Unfortunately, a lot of people are walking around with nervous systems that are seriously out of whack.

And chronic overstimulation further erodes that internal stability.

Young children need protection while that system is forming.Image
This is why limits alone don’t work.

You can restrict screens—but if the nervous system is already dysregulated, the craving remains.

Real change requires rebuilding regulation through sleep, movement, connection, reduced sensory overload, and good old-fashioned play.

Replacement matters more than restriction.Image
The tragedy is that much of this harm is invisible at first.

Kids seem “advanced,” “engaged,” “quiet.”

The costs show up later—as attention problems, emotional volatility, anxiety, or dependence on constant stimulation to feel okay.

By then, the habits are entrenched.

Parents don’t set out hoping to damage their children’s nervous systems. They trust that these products made for children are not harmful to their target audience.

Once they realize they’ve been sucked into a trap, it can be hard to escape it.Image
@MidwesternDoc But there is a way out of this trap.

It doesn’t require rejecting technology—it just requires understanding how nervous systems actually heal.

The full article from @MidwesternDoc maps a path forward.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…
This isn’t about blaming parents.

Families are navigating a constantly changing environment engineered against them. The responsibility belongs with systems that monetize neurological vulnerability—especially in children who can’t consent or defend themselves.

Awareness is the first form of protection.Image
@MidwesternDoc Children don’t need constant stimulation to thrive.

They need safety. Rhythm. Boredom. Presence.

They need time for their nervous systems to settle and integrate.

These things build resilience, focus, and real joy—the kind that doesn’t crash.

Depth beats intensity. Image
What’s at stake isn’t just attention spans.

It’s whether the next generation grows up capable of sustained thought, emotional regulation, and meaningful connection—or locked into chasing hollow highs that never satisfy.

That outcome is being shaped now. And if most kids stay on this path, the outcome could be disastrous.Image
@MidwesternDoc Thankfully, nervous systems are adaptable.

When overstimulation is reduced and regulation is restored, attention improves. Emotional volatility softens. Joy returns in quieter, more stable forms.

Healing isn’t instant—but it is real. Image
@MidwesternDoc Protecting our children doesn’t mean isolating them from the modern world.

It means understanding how that world works—and choosing environments that support development rather than exploit it.

That choice matters more than most people realize. Image
@MidwesternDoc A society that trades children’s nervous systems for engagement metrics is borrowing against its future.

Reversing that trajectory starts with clarity, restraint, and a willingness to value long-term health over short-term convenience.

That work begins at home. Image
@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc.

Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact.

Read the original report here: midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…
@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:

This Is What Happens When You Stop Taking Ozempic
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-oz…
@MidwesternDoc The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkab…
@MidwesternDoc The #1 Killer in Hospitals Isn’t a Disease — It’s a Word

midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-h…
@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow.

No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed.

This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow.

--> @MidwesternDoc Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

Jun 26
Before the hepatitis B vaccine was mandated for kids to attend school in almost all 50 states, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was 1 in 7 million.

“That means you need to give 7 MILLION hepatitis B vaccines to prevent ONE death,” RFK Jr. says.

When you give 7 million vaccines to save one life, you’d better make damn sure it’s safe.

But is it really? Let’s take a look at the evidence. 🧵
Every newborn in America is pushed toward a Hepatitis B vaccine within hours of being born.

And that sounds completely normal to most people because the policy has been normalized for decades.

But when you take a close look at Hepatitis B, the risk group, the benefit math, and the forgotten safety record, the birth-dose policy becomes very difficult to defend.Image
Hepatitis B is a real disease.

Chronic infection can damage the liver, lead to liver failure, and increase the risk of liver cancer later in life.

That part is not the dispute.

The dispute is whether every newborn, including babies born to mothers who test negative for Hepatitis B, should receive the vaccine on their very first day of life.Image
Read 30 tweets
Jun 25
You may have missed this news recently - the health insurance system in America is so broken, that the Trump administration is quietly rewriting the Affordable Care Act and buried deep in a monstrous 1,000+ page document is a ploy to let health insurance companies start lending money to patients to pay for their medical care.

That's right: if you get hit with a devastating diagnosis or an unexpected emergency, your "insurance" company won't just pay the bill... they'll offer you a loan instead. So you can go deeper into debt to the very same industry that's already failing you.

Let me say that again. You pay health insurance so that you'll be insured in a time of a health crisis. Already, health insurers are denying nearly 20% of claims and out of pocket expenses keep rising. So instead of them paying your bill, which is what you pay the insurance for, they'll now be incentivized to deny even more bills or raise out of pocket expenses in order to cash in on the interest they'll be collecting.

A third of American households are already drowning in medical debt — and now insurers get to pile on even more, with interest. While these companies rake in billions in profits, everyday people will be trapped paying back loans for the care they thought was "covered." This isn't fixing healthcare.

This is turning your health insurer into your loan shark — and making an already predatory, dysfunctional system even more financially crushing for ordinary Americans. Classic "you get sick, you go broke" American healthcare — now with extra debt servitude.

On the plus side, there is a company that is providing a solution to this problem. CrowdHealth, a member focused health care company is saving Americans tens of thousands of dollars, and in May of this year 100% of medical bills were funded.

No loans needed. No exorbitant premiums. No crazy out of pocket expenses. A model that is actually working, is not throwing Americans into bankruptcy because of an unexpected health event, is saving people money, and getting them the health care they need.

Andy Schoonover from CrowdHealth joins us now to discuss.
A billionaire recently mused that the ultra-wealthy get the top doctors, the best lawyers, the elite tutors, and wondered aloud what it would take to give every American that kind of access. Andy’s answer is that it already exists, just not the way Reid Hoffman imagines it.

Inside CrowdHealth, your income doesn’t decide your doctor. “Whether you’re making $30,000 a year or $3 million a year, you have access to the same doctors.” Members up and down the economic ladder have walked into Mayo, MD Anderson, Stanford, Cleveland Clinic.

The real threat to that access isn’t money. It’s bureaucracy. As government plans expand, the best doctors are quietly heading for the exits. Mayo Clinic recently dropped a slate of Medicare Advantage plans rather than swallow the government’s reimbursement rates. Andy’s read on the pattern is blunt: “Free markets tend to exit stage left and the government bureaucracy enters as the main character.”

His prediction is that within a decade the top doctors stop taking insurance entirely. CrowdHealth’s bet is that members who already pay doctors directly are built for exactly that world.

But cash-pay only matters if the money actually arrives when you’re the one in the hospital bed. So how does a crowd of strangers guarantee your bill gets paid?
Health insurance in America is broken.

Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.

But there’s an alternative.

CrowdHealth is a community-powered model that has helped members fund over 40,000 medical bills at a fraction of the cost of traditional insurance.

So far, 30,000+ members have been helped, saving an estimated $73 million in medical costs.

CrowdHealth isn’t insurance. It’s a way to step outside the broken system and take control of your healthcare.

Get started today for $99 per member per month for the first three months.

Go to joincrowdhealth.com/promos/pulse and use code PULSE.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 25
RFK Jr. once said: “They’re making $60 billion a year selling us vaccines, but they’re making $500 billion a year selling the remedies for the injuries caused by vaccines.”

“This is a really great business plan for [pharmaceutical] companies. You make people sick, and then you sell them the lifetime cure.”

This interview, which originally aired on September 17, 2020, was removed by YouTube for “medical misinformation.”

But was it really “misinformation,” or was RFK Jr. leading viewers to an inconvenient truth?

In just about every industry, a great product makes you rich beyond belief, except one: medicine.

The rules for enrichment work differently here. And the reason why is exactly what they don’t want you to know. 🧵
There’s a principle that I’m sure you’re familiar with: once you see it, you can’t unsee.

No industry built to solve a problem ever actually solves it. Think about it—a cure for the problem is a death sentence for the paycheck. The cancer charity that beats cancer has to close its doors. The dating app that finds you a partner just lost a paying user.

So problems don’t get solved. They get managed. Indefinitely.

And nowhere has this been turned into more of an art form than medicine.Image
We’re taught to see healthcare as a race toward cures. Brilliant minds, billions in research, all pointed at making disease disappear.

But that’s not how it works.

Let’s take a look at how the business model actually works. It’s actually pretty simple.

A cured patient stops paying. A managed patient pays forever.

When those two incentives collide, take a guess at which one usually wins.Image
Read 21 tweets
Jun 24
Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced?

“This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.”

So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963?

The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney @AaronSiriSG.

Yet “science” wants you to believe that vaccines saved the day.

But that’s not even the biggest vaccine deception. It’s what happens before they approve these shots for human use. 🧵
Faith in vaccines is just that. Faith.

Complete trust. Allegiance to duty. Belief in something for which there is no proof.

Medicine has carefully crafted a myth that it and only it rescued humanity from the dark ages of deadly disease. The kind of disease that was lurking around every corner, ready to wipe us off the map for all of eternity.

And because medicine so valiantly rescued us from erasure, it deserves ultimate supremacy. It should never be questioned. It can do no wrong.Image
A central part of medical mythology is the belief that vaccines ended infectious disease. And because it is indeed mythology and its adherents are acting on faith alone, it requires no proof and can simply dismiss any and all evidence against that bold claim.

But the evidence is not lacking. Far from it.

Despite medicine’s best efforts to hide and obscure it, those seeking the truth can plainly see it.

In this short presentation, Secretary Kennedy lays it out for all to see. There is no evidence that vaccines were responsible for the decline in infectious disease that has so aggressively been credited to them.

It is pure mythology.
Read 30 tweets
Jun 23
In 2014, 300 scientists warned Anthony Fauci would start a global pandemic.

Following the high-profile escape of three bugs from U.S. labs, these 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama, urging him to shut down Anthony Fauci's gain-of-function research.

Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of the worst projects by Anthony Fauci. In the end, he really didn't shut them down. Instead, Obama moved the research offshore to places like Ukraine, the former Soviet State of Georgia, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.

Now, it is widely accepted that COVID-19 originated from that very lab in Wuhan, China.

Those 300 scientists were right about Fauci…

But the big question is, why are people like him so obsessed with creating dangerous pathogens in the first place? 🧵
Bioweapons research is always sold with the same simple promise:

We have to make pathogens more dangerous so we can learn how to stop them.

Honestly, that sounds insane when stated plainly.

But somehow this logic has funded a massive industry for decades, and the safety record is far worse than most people realize.Image
The public hears “pandemic preparedness” and imagines top scientists working tirelessly to prevent the next disaster.

But it’s not that simple.

The deeper problem is that this research often involves collecting dangerous pathogens, modifying them, storing them, passing them through animals, testing their behavior, and hoping the lab never makes a mistake.

And there are a lot of mistakes that can be made.Image
Read 30 tweets
Jun 22
Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.

A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Paralyzed.

Odds of recovery: 1 in 1,000,000

Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.

What happened?

His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.

ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”

“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”

“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”

“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”

“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”

“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”

“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”

“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”

“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”

“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”

Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.

But his mother attests it was the DMSO.

The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵
Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.

A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.

It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.

It acts more like a cellular reset.

And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.Image
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-dmso-hea…
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(