The federal government is monitoring my website to manage the fallout of my disabled veteran husband's, Conrad Rockenhaus's potential death, rather than intervening to prevent it.
They are waiting for me to upload a death certificate so they can update their risk model.
It isn't bureaucracy.
It is a group of people watching a slow-motion murder and checking their clipboards to make sure they documented it correctly.
By checking it repeatedly for months, and doing nothing, they are establishing a digital paper trail that they are fully aware of the emergency.
They are watching the building burn, checking the temperature, and deciding not to call the fire department. That is calculated cruelty.
If they didn't know, they would download it fresh (200 OK). If they didn't care, they wouldn't check at all.
A 304 Not Modified means their system asked: "Has she added anything new to the torture file?"
My server replied: "No, it's the same emergency."
@threadreaderapp unroll
That isn't stagnation. It is Depraved Indifference.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A man with "Insider Skills" who cannot be bought is terrifying to men who sold out. He proves that their "National Security" excuses are actually just "Profit Protection."
They sell the idea that they can spot "Insider Threats."
The Reality: Conrad (the "Rogue" SysAdmin) exposes that their vetting is a sham. He exposes that the real "Insider Threat" isn't the guy using Tor; it's the Board Member hiring a stalker.
By refusing to be corrupted, Conrad shines a spotlight on their corruption.
They hate him because he is the mirror they are afraid to look into. He is the Patriot they claim to be, while they are just the Mercenaries getting paid.
The "Impossible Mandate" (How SAUSA Corinne Lambert is Criminalizing Survival)
What Lambert does is pure cruelty.
The Argument: She argued my 100% disabled veteran husband, Conrad Rockenhaus, should be imprisoned for failing to pay restitution.
The Trap: She simultaneously prosecuted him for "unauthorized device use" (his work iPhone), the only tool he had to earn the money to pay that restitution.
The Result: Lambert created a "Catch-22" where my husband was guilty if he worked (device violation) and guilty if he didn't (restitution violation). She engineered his failure.
September 19, 2025 at 10:01 AM.
I notified Lambert's office that FCI Milan had just administered a lethal overdose to my husband.
U.S. Attorney Corinne Lambert isn't the one beating my disabled veteran husband, Conrad Rockenhaus, in the cell; she is the one filing the briefs that keep him there to die.
She is the "desk murderer" who ensures the system doesn't accidentally let him go.
Conrad passed a polygraph administered by the U.S. Probation Office approximately one year ago.
This test proved he was compliant. By suppressing it, Lambert allowed the Court to view him as "non-compliant" and "dangerous."
Hiding exculpatory evidence is a direct violation of Brady v. Maryland.
The "T4" Tactic: Lambert hid the proof of his "health" (compliance) to justify his "elimination" (incarceration).
"Crazy" people are disorganized. Their narratives shift. Their evidence is emotional, not factual. They don't have spreadsheets, timestamps, IP logs, and citations.
Autistic hyper-documentation is the exact opposite:
It is rigid.
It is comprehensive.
It is unrelenting.
It treats every single detail with equal importance.
To a lazy bureaucrat or an arrogant contractor, this looks like "obsession."
To a federal judge or an OIG investigator, this looks like Evidence.
By the time they realized I was not "crazy," but instead, a highly focused archivist of their own corruption, it was too late.
Their bots had already downloaded the proof, and their lawyers were already reading the logs.
I didn't just document the crime; I documented their reaction to the crime.
This whole experience has made me feel like "National Security" is not a state of safety; it is an industry.
Agencies like the FBI, US Marshals, and private intelligence firms have a massive problem: There aren't enough terrorists.
The Business Model: To justify their billion-dollar budgets and "SETA" contracts, they need threats.
The Solution: If they can't find a threat, they have to make one.
We Are the Product: By raiding a bored, medically retired veteran, and his autistic wife, watching daytime TV, they get to file paperwork claiming they "disrupted a dangerous anti-government extremist."