Kevin Bass Profile picture
Jan 26 11 tweets 7 min read Read on X
I am horrified. I cannot believe it.

I analyzed public databases and media reporting on violent confrontations with ICE over the past year.

Just 9 counties accounted for TWO-THIRDS of violent confrontations with ICE in America.

This is twice all violent confrontations in the remaining 3,134 counties COMBINED.

A violent confrontation in these 9 counties was 590 TIMES more likely than any of these other 3,134 counties.

590 times.

I plotted these 9 counties, and I found that all 9 counties are sanctuary jurisdictions run by Democrat politicians that resist immigration law enforcement.

These violent confrontations are RARE in states and cities where local officials cooperate with law enforcement.Image
For the above figure, I excluded all counties with 3 or fewer incidents to highlight the counties with the highest concentration of violent confrontations.

For transparency, here is the full figure, which includes the remaining 65 of 175 violent confrontation spread elsewhere. Image
The major cities in these top 9 counties are well-known:

Chicago is at the top, with Brandon Johnson as mayor.

Then, in order:

Los Angeles (Karen Bass)
Minneapolis (Jacob Frey)
New York City (Zohran Mamdani)
Portland (Karen Wilson)

Then San Francisco, Seattle, Newark, and Denver.
Methodology and detailed findings

ICE ENFORCEMENT INCIDENTS ANALYSIS (2025-2026)

An analysis of violent confrontations between ICE agents and non-immigrants
(protesters, journalists, bystanders, officers, and US citizens) during
immigration enforcement operations.

KEY FINDING: EXTREME GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION

The top 9 counties account for 63% of all violent confrontations with non-immigrants nationwide.

A violent confrontation is 590 TIMES MORE LIKELY in the top 9 counties than in any of the other 3,134 US counties.

BY THE NUMBERS

Total non-immigrant incidents: 174
Incidents in top 9 counties: 110 (63%)
Incidents in remaining 3,134 counties: 64 (37%)
Counties with 4+ incidents: 9
Per-county likelihood ratio: 590x

TOP 9 COUNTIES (4+ incidents each)

Rank County City Incidents Mayor
---- ------ ---- --------- -----
1 Cook County, IL Chicago 28 Brandon Johnson
2 Los Angeles Co, CA Los Angeles 25 Karen Bass
3 Hennepin County, MN Minneapolis 21 Jacob Frey
4 New York County, NY New York City 12 Zohran Mamdani
5 Multnomah County, OR Portland 6 Keith Wilson
6 San Francisco Co, CA San Francisco 6 Daniel Lurie
7 King County, WA Seattle 4 Katie Wilson
8 Essex County, NJ Newark 4 Ras Baraka
9 Denver County, CO Denver 4 Mike Johnston

All 9 counties are in jurisdictions with sanctuary policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

WHAT COUNTS AS A "VIOLENT CONFRONTATION"

This analysis focuses on confrontations involving people who are NOT the targets of immigration enforcement:

- Protesters: Individuals at demonstrations against ICE operations
- Journalists: Press covering enforcement actions
- Bystanders: Uninvolved individuals caught in enforcement operations
- US Citizens: American citizens wrongfully detained, assaulted, or deported
- Officers: ICE/CBP agents injured in attacks on facilities

These are tracked separately from incidents involving detainees or enforcement targets.

DATA SOURCES

The data comes from multiple sources, organized by reliability:

TIER 1 - Official Government Data (49 incidents)
Sources: ICE Detainee Death Reporting, DOJ records, court filings

TIER 2 - Investigative Journalism (69 incidents)
Sources: The Trace, ProPublica, NBC News investigations

TIER 3 - Systematic News Search (218 incidents)
Sources: AP, Reuters, major outlets via defined search methodology

TIER 4 - Ad-Hoc News Reports (64 incidents)
Sources: Local news, verified social media reports

TOTAL: 400 documented incidents (174 involving non-immigrants)

HOW THE DATA WAS COLLECTED

Tier 1 (Official Data):
- ICE Detainee Death Reporting website
- American Immigration Lawyers Association death tracking
- DOJ court records and federal litigation filings
- FOIA releases
Note: ICE stopped publishing death reports after October 2025

Tier 2 (Investigative Journalism):
- The Trace: ICE/CBP shootings tracker
- ProPublica: US citizens detained/deported investigation
- ProPublica: Less-lethal weapons documentation
- ProPublica: Banned chokeholds video evidence
- NBC News: ICE shootings compilation
- ACLU litigation filings

Tier 3 (Systematic News Search):
- Defined source list: AP, Reuters, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, major regional papers
- Search terms: "ICE shooting", "ICE protest", "CBP force", etc.
- Date range: January 20, 2025 - January 26, 2026
- Each incident verified against at least one additional source

Tier 4 (Ad-Hoc Reports):
- Local newspapers
- Verified social media posts
- Community organization reports
- Each record includes source URL for verification

SANCTUARY STATUS CLASSIFICATION

Primary source: DOJ Sanctuary Jurisdiction List (Executive Order 14287)
Secondary source: ILRC State Map on Immigration Enforcement

Categories:
- Sanctuary: State/local policy limits cooperation with ICE
- Anti-sanctuary: State law requires cooperation with ICE
- Neutral: No formal policy either direction
- Cooperative: Voluntarily cooperates with ICE detainers

KNOWN LIMITATIONS

1. Media coverage bias - Sanctuary jurisdictions may receive more media attention, potentially inflating incident counts in those areas

2. ICE reporting gaps - ICE stopped publishing death reports after October 2025

3. Selection bias - Tier 3-4 data has higher selection bias risk

4. Known undercounts:
- ProPublica found 170+ US citizen detentions; ~50 documented here
- The Trace identified 26 shootings; 19 with full details here
- GAO found ICE couldn't provide 5 years of use-of-force data

DATA COVERAGE

Time period: January 20, 2025 - January 26, 2026
Geographic scope: All 50 US states + DC
Last updated: January 26, 2026

FOR MORE INFORMATION

The full dataset with source URLs for each incident is available in the data files. Each incident record includes the original news source for verification.
Discussion

Democrat media and politicians antagonize and agitate activists in these cities, encouraging violent confrontation.

We now have evidence that in Minneapolis, the Lieutenant governor herself was coordinating violent resistance.

Judges have repeatedly dismissed cases of violent assault by activists in these cities against ICE agents.

This allows these activists to act with impunity. It emboldens them.

The media never talks about this.

The American public not understanding the strategy is required for it to work.

On the other hand, any time an ICE agent makes a mistake after being constantly threatened, often with deadly force from these activists, the media talks about it constantly.

What's clear is that these cities do not represent America.

They represent a violent, activist extreme, supported by a phalanx of activist judges and media.

These extremists are trying to create and provoke violence in these decaying, dying parts of the country.

Their hope, it appears, is to hamper and eliminate immigration enforcement around the country.
Github with all code and data reproduce or challenge the analysis

github.com/kevinnbass/ice…
After the Covid pandemic, I was horrified that science wasn't safe from politics. When I spoke up, I was dismissed from medical school, smeared, my reputation destroyed. Donations much appreciated for the legal fight to reveal the truth. givesendgo.com/kevinbasslegal
To explain the 590x number more clearly:

If you take the number of incidents in the top 9 counties and compare the number of incidents in the remaining 3,134 counties

You're 590x more likely to have an incident in one of these top 9 counties than in one of these 3,134 counties
I have just corrected a minor error in the methodology, related to calculating the ratio.

The ratio *was* based on the tier 3 and 4 sources.

The update is included in the github readme file.

The possible interpretations that this opens up (likely not correct--but admittedly possible) are still very unfavorable to left-wing narratives.

I did take these interpretations into account before posting. Science is very complex and I always simplify for social media but I also always take into account "forking interpretations" to ensure that my analyses cleave to the substantial truth (i.e., they introduce what might be called "narrative dilemmas" no matter which interpretations critics choose).

Only a tiny percentage of scientists will understand what I mean by all of the above. I've chosen politics (or rather, politics chose me), but I'm always more than happy to discourse with scientists. In the end, politics without truth is empty--and potentially catastrophic. That's one big reason why we must always keep insisting on science.
Some have said that some of my source's URLs do not work. I therefore built a robust validation script and also reviewed them myself.

All 586 sources should now work. In addition, the full text from 573 articles are now available for review on github.
In the process of fixing the data, Denver was dropped from the top 9, fewer than 4 incidents. The others changed slightly.

8 counties now account for 64% of violent confrontations, with 623x higher rate among the top 8.

The story got stronger. Thanks to the critic. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Bass

Kevin Bass Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kevinnbass

Jan 21
Americans are fleeing Democrat-run states in droves.

Do Democrats incentivize illegal immigrants to replace them?

I crunched data from 2023.

I found: the more Americans fleeing their states, the more benefits these states provide to illegal immigrants, p<0.0001.

Democrats are replacing Americans with illegal immigrants.Image
In 2023, states that provide welfare benefits to illegal immigrants had a net flight of 0.26% of the population.

Meanwhile, states that provided no benefits to illegal immigrants had a net inflow of 0.32%. Image
17 states provide welfare benefits to illegal immigrants.

Of the top 10 states that show the biggest flight of Americans, NINE provide such benefits.

Of the top 10 states with the biggest inflow of Americans, just ONE provides them.

You can see the top 10 of each below. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 16
In Dem states, illegal immigrants receive welfare, attracting them to the state.

Lack of voter ID allows them to vote.

This creates an incentive for illegal immigrant voting.

But it's not just theory. It's election outcomes.

Illegals are swinging elections.

A thread. Image
Why do Democrats insist on providing welfare to illegal immigrants?

Why are they so hostile to voter ID laws?

In 2024, Trump won almost every state that required voter ID.

He also won almost every state that did not provide welfare to illegal immigrants.

In contrast, Kamala won almost every state that did NOT require voter ID.

And she won almost every state that DID provide welfare to illegal immigrants.Image
For voter ID laws, almost all states had election outcomes that aligned with the policies.

Strict voter ID law states went to Trump almost every single time.

Likewise, effective no-ID law states went to Harris almost every single time.

Only 8 of 51 states did not. (DC included.)Image
Read 16 tweets
Jan 4
I crunched the data. Again.

I made a map. Again.

The picture is now even CLEANER.

States without voter ID requirements are 16x more likely to offer welfare benefits to illegal immigrants than states requiring ID (67% vs 4%, p<0.0001).

Dems are importing and paying illegals for votes.

Details👇Image
Just one state out of 27 with effective voter ID provides welfare to illegal immigrants. Rhode Island.

Specifically, healthcare to children.

That's the 4%.

16 of 24 states without effective voter ID provide welfare to illegal immigrants.

That's the 67%. Image
The data are highly statistically significant across most categories. Image
Read 18 tweets
Oct 29, 2025
Christopher Caldwell in his Age of Entitlement (2020) offers the best analysis that I have seen for why the universities are now all left-wing. It's not that left-wing ideas have "won". It's that universities (and govt institutions) have no choice, LEGALLY. Here's his argument: Image
The civil rights revolution created a second constitutional order.

This order, though its stated intention is equality, gradually displaced the older liberal order of procedural neutrality.

Federally funded institutions MUST pursue identity politics.
Over time, civil rights compliance obligations (Title VI, Title IX, affirmative action enforcement, diversity mandates, DEI bureaucracies, etc.) forced every major institution that takes federal funds--including universities--into a permanent left-coded institutional culture.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 12, 2025
The modern Western political ideologies LIBERALISM, PROGRESSIVISM, and MARXISM should be understood as fundamentalist secularized denominations of Protestant Christianity.

All three descend from the same post-Reformation religious/moral structure:
PROTESTANTISM's faith alone became moral agency.

Inner conscience guided by God became secular trust in Reason, Science, or Justice.

Salvation became Progress.

Priesthood of all believers became moral equality.

Without God though, moral worth became performance to others.
Notably, all three ideologies inherit the DISTINCTIVE Protestant anthropology: a) the conviction that the individual conscience is the supreme authority, b) the suspicion that hierarchy is inherently corrupt, and c) a belief in history as a story of redemption from bondage.
Read 25 tweets
Sep 19, 2025
In May 2020, CDC analyzed all mask data, finding no benefit.

CDC, entirely Democrats, lied and pushed mandates anyway. It demonized right-wing dissenters as "anti-maskers".

Trust collapsed.

CDC engaged in left-wing political warfare over science.

Why should we trust the CDC? Image
CDC's study showing no evidence for masks:

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…Image
The CDC is 100% Democrat.

OK, fine, 99.94%. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(