Japan is an interesting case in a lot of ways. It has a ton of domestic debt (and significant domestic financial assets) which generates heated concerns about its solvency/ ability to manage higher rates. But it is also a massive global creditor --
1/
Japan's net holdings of bonds (net of foreign holdings of JGBs) is close to 50% of its GDP (a creditor position as big v GDP as the US net det position). That includes $1 trillion in bonds held in Japan's $1.175 trillion in reserves, + over $2 trillion in other holdings
2/
That translates into big holdings of US debt -- the MoF's Treasuries all show up in the US TIC data, but the corporate bonds held by the lifers, postbank and the GPIF are only partially captured in the US data b/c of third party management/ the use of EU custodians
3/
Japan has a big net FDI position as well -- so the net international investment position is much bigger than just the net position in bonds
4/
This translates into a 4.8 pp of GDP current account surplus even with the trade deficit -- all from investment income
5/
Coupon income from the bonds is now close to 2.5% of GDP - a real sum, even if it is smaller that the global profit of Japanese firms (Toyota etc)
6/
The other key thing about Japan is that a large share of the country's foreign assets are held by the public sector:
MoF has $1.175 trillion in reserves
GPIF has over $900b in foreign assets, including over $450b in bonds
Post bank has another $600b in foreign bonds (mostly corporate bonds, and mostly hedged) -- tho is it finally starting to raise its holdings of JGBS (its financial statement also shows how it became overweight in long-dated JGBs)
Sum that all up and it is a huge amount of foreign assets -- over $2.5 trillion, mostly unhedged ... and with massive mark to market gains that the public sector could realize to reduce its gross debt at any point in time!
9/
right now the interest income on Japan's foreign assets is more or less offsetting domestic interest payments, so net interest is tiny -- despite massive debts (the rate on yen liabilities tho is poised to rise a bit)
10/
And capital gains on all of the foreign assets at MoF and the GPIF + smaller far fiscal deficits than in the US have brought net debt down to be within shooting distance of much of the rest of the G-7
11/
So to my way of thinking, heavily influenced by the strength of Japan's external fx balance sheet, some of the concerns about Japan's proposed fiscal loosening are overdone. Takaichi isn't proposing half of what Trump has tweeted out ... and her starting point is better
12/
And Japan has options that most countries with lots of fiscal debt don't have, as most countries with a large stock of domestic fiscal debt aren't also massive external creditors with big flow earnings on their offshore assets.
13/13
p.s. The flow out of Japan and into global bonds in recent years has been modest, a net flow of around $70 billion 0.2 pp of US GDP). That is much lower than pre-COVID.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A bit of background. Taiwan's lifers hold $700 billion in foreign currency assets abroad (more counting their holdings of local ETFs that invest heavily in foreign bonds) v ~ $200 billion in domestic fx policies -- so fx gap (pre hedging) of $500 billion
2/
Taiwan's regulator (perhaps the most complicit regulator on earth) not allows the lifers NOT to mark their fx holdings to the fx market -- so the lifers are incentivized not to hedge (and they are rapidly reducing their hedge ratio)
14m cars would be roughly 1/4th of the global market for cars outside China (the Chinese market is ~ 25m cars) ... no way that doesn't have a disruptive impact.
China would go from 6 to 14m cars in a two year period if 2025 isn't an outlier ...
2/
Not clear that German/ European politics can caught up to the scale of China's export tsunami. And some European firms think they can profit from China's subsidies and strong local supply chain by producing in China for the European market
For some reason I decided to look at the external financial of investments of the main Scandinavian countries in a bit more depth --
Big surpluses, and tend to split the outflow equally between bonds and stocks
1/
For the big 3 collectively, portfolio flows map well to the current account surplus -- which is a common outcome now that there is less intermediation via the central bank. Denmark's portfolio flows tho are now a bit smaller than its accumulated surplus
2/
The Danes hold about $40 billion (per the IMF's coordinated investment survey) of US bonds, and $260 billion in US equities. The teacher's pension fund played the news well -- in aggregate, it would be hard for the Danish public funds to move the US bond market
China's premier says China wants to be a market for the world, not just a source of supply.
He might want to get get started.
China exported over 7m passenger cars in 2025, and the pace of growth accelerated at the end of the year
1/ many
Passenger car imports are down to half a million, and falling fast ... no market for the world there
2/
As an aside the pace of China's (N)EV exports doubled over the course of 2025 -- huge, huge growth ... China is still a source of global supply there, not a source of global demand
The technicals around the long-end of the Japanese curve are difficult: the natural buyers are all underwater on their legacy holdings, making it a hedge fund playground.
I tho would love to hear a good explanation of the fiscal concerns, gross debt isn't the only metric
1/
Maybe the IMF's data is off, but it has the general government deficit in 2025 at under 2 pp pf GDP (way better than the US) and it likely would be ~ 2% of GDP even with Takaichi's 0.7 pp of GDP(?) stimulus
2/
Net debt is much more clearly on a downward trajectory than the US -- and the net interest bill is very modest comparatively (even with high gross debt); it will get worse JGBs are refinanced but there is room to give a bit ...
Gonna push back against my friends* at FT alphaville just a bit.
The countries that have backed the Danes most strongly (and the Danes themselves) are the surplus countries of Europe & they have generally have a ton of public sector financial assets
The Dutch are a good example; massive public sector pension funds. Sweden isn't that different. Denmark has big public investors (Norway is all Norges Bank obvly)
2/
With Germany you need to be a bit more creative -- but the Sparkassen have way more deposits than loans, and put a lot of money into bonds ... ask Christian Kopf
Allianz is ultimately a regulated German insurer, subject to public pressure