WSJ: “DNI is leading an administration-wide effort to hunt for proof of tampering in the [2020 election]” 
Gabbard “has begun studying information about voting machines, analyzed data from swing states, and pursued theories [the election was stolen]…
particularly on foreign government interference.”
particularly on foreign government interference.”
Gabbie has “regularly briefed Trump and Susie Wiles about her inquiry in recent months along with others involved in the investigation.”
“Others” included senior DOJ officials, Cleta Mitchell, and Kurt Olsen.
Gabbie shad also consulted with IC officials “about claims of foreign interference in the 2020 election.”
“Others” included senior DOJ officials, Cleta Mitchell, and Kurt Olsen.
Gabbie shad also consulted with IC officials “about claims of foreign interference in the 2020 election.”
Gabbard “is expected to prepare a report on her work”
‘Gabbard’s office said the director of national intelligence “has a vital role in identifying vulnerabilities in our critical infrastructure and protecting against exploitation.”’
“DNI Gabbard has and will continue to take actions within her authorities, alongside our interagency partners, to support ensuring the integrity of our elections,”
“Gabbard has also been involved in a separate effort to promote allegations that President Barack Obama and senior officials in his administration manufactured a false conspiracy that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to undermine Trump’s first White House victory.”
Something to keep in mind, folks…
@DNIGabbard ‘s work on weaponization of intelligence in the 2016 election resulted in:
Disclosures
A Report
A Press Conference
Evidence production to DOJ
And…
CRIMINAL REFERRALS.
@DNIGabbard ‘s work on weaponization of intelligence in the 2016 election resulted in:
Disclosures
A Report
A Press Conference
Evidence production to DOJ
And…
CRIMINAL REFERRALS.
Also, an aside…
It always amuses me, and confounds me, that each political side will embrace foreign interference in the election their candidate lost but not in the one their candidate won.
Ugh.
People… there’s foreign interference in EVERY ELECTION! It’s just a matter of scale, impact, and the fidelity with which that interference is digested by the IC and communicated to the public.
It always amuses me, and confounds me, that each political side will embrace foreign interference in the election their candidate lost but not in the one their candidate won.
Ugh.
People… there’s foreign interference in EVERY ELECTION! It’s just a matter of scale, impact, and the fidelity with which that interference is digested by the IC and communicated to the public.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
