Minneapolis’s “ICE watch” network did not arise organically. My 3.5-week investigation for @CityJournal found that a well-funded group of professional activists implemented the operation, deploying a model now being used in cities across the US. 🧵
“Defend the 612” purports to be a spontaneous community effort merely filming ICE. My investigation shows it was organized with professional help. Its Signal networks are used to coordinate the hiding of illegal aliens, develop a media “propaganda” strategy, and plan violent protests, while its trainings push civilians toward dangerous confrontations.
Jill Garvey is the architect of this strategy. She pioneered the ICE watch model in 2017 with a Chicago group called Protect RP. In 2024, she co-founded States at the Core (STAC), which turned this model into a national strategy in early 2025.
STAC operates within the largest funding networks in progressive politics. It is fiscally sponsored by the Hopewell Fund, part of the Arabella Advisors dark money network, which moved roughly $1.179 billion across nearly 200 projects last year.
This model is being exported nationwide. STAC trainings have reached 20 states, including direct organizing support in Los Angeles, Washington DC, Charlotte, and New Orleans. By December, STAC was working with local Minneapolis activists to help form Defend the 612.
Protect RP was explicit about interfering with ICE operations. Defend the 612 echoes this language in its trainings, downplaying safety concerns, delegitimizing law enforcement, and encouraging participants to take greater risks in service of the movement.
Defend the 612 uses massive Signal networks to stalk ICE. Thousands of people across hundreds of neighborhood groups track suspected agents, logging license plates and the specific hotels where they stay.
The network runs vetted mutual aid groups that raise rent funds, deliver groceries, and provide transportation so illegal immigrants do not have to leave their homes and risk ICE contact, which can constitute harboring. Internal chats even discuss eating paper address records.
I also accessed a vetted group used for external media shaping. Members claimed a reporter from the Minnesota Reformer, part of the States Newsroom, which got its start with Arabella Advisors’ Hopewell Fund, gave them full editorial control over a story.
These groups openly discuss sabotage plans and violent protests. They encourage volunteers to throw urine on agents, harass them, and get arrested intentionally to divert federal resources. They planned a protest where violence was the goal.
Defend the 612 organizers used the deaths of Renee Good, whose Signal account I found within their network, and Alex Pretti to recruit new members. While volunteers face these physical and legal risks, the salaried architects of the movement remain shielded.
My investigation for @CityJournal reveals the professionalized strategy that brought ICE watch chaos to Minneapolis. Read the full report here: city-journal.org/article/minnea…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Minneapolis’s ICE watch network is not just “monitoring” ICE activity. Internal Signal chats explicitly describe their media work as propaganda and discuss controlling narratives and managing journalists.
While undercover in the Defend the 612 network, I accessed a vetted channel called “Central communications,” created for “external narrative-shaping strategy.” 🧵
On January 13, trans activist Elle Neubauer, using the handle “princess (she/her/fae/faer),” described allowing Madison McVan of the Minnesota Reformer to accompany him on a ride-along while following ICE by car. minnesotareformer.com/2026/01/13/in-…
Neubauer claimed the reporter gave activists editorial control over the article, writing, “they gave us final say over the story. They read most of it aloud to us line by line last night, and we asked for changes. If we told them to pull the story they would have.”
He added that the journalists were “extremely up front and down for any changes asked.”
I joined an ICE watch training held by Defend the 612 organizers in Minneapolis on January 8, before they began taking additional steps to conceal their identities and activities.
In the training, organizers described their goal as impeding ICE operations. They downplayed risks, delegitimized law enforcement, and encouraged participants to take risks. 🧵
Defend the 612 used Renee Good’s death as a recruitment opportunity. On the evening of January 7, they advertised an “emergency vigil” for Good, where fliers were distributed directing attendees to sign up for ICE watch on their website.
This recruitment appeared to work. Andrew Fahlstrom, who led the January 8 training, is a longtime activist with the tenant organizing group Inquilinx Unidx Por Justicia (IX) and treasurer of Sky Without Limits.
He said the group had gained 1,000 new signups and stated that the purpose of the meeting was to “grow the number of people on the streets.”
Some of the most interesting research-based findings and insights from my new @CityJournal piece on the left’s depraved celebratory reactions to Charlie Kirk’s murder 🧵
Post analysis:
Across all platforms, there were posts and comments that celebrated, mocked, or justified the murder.
Many of the explicitly celebratory posts were concentrated on TikTok, where people filmed their reactions; some drew hundreds of thousands of likes before being removed for violating rules against celebrating violence.
On Instagram and Blue$ky, the most common posts used false or context-stripped quotes attributed to Kirk, paired with sentiments implying he hated minorities and thus deserved what happened and shouldn’t be mourned. These drew hundreds of thousands of likes and shares.
TikTok and Instagram Reels also had a large volume of one-minute mashups of out-of-context Kirk quotes, carrying the same sentiment.
Taken together across these posts and platforms, millions engaged with them in agreement.
Cognitive shortcuts:
Bandwagon effect: Believing something because others believe it. A large number of likes and shares on a post suggests many have vetted and endorsed the message; when that number is high enough, the post feels almost certainly true.
Illusory truth effect: As platform algorithms push similar posts, repetition makes users more likely to accept a claim as true simply because it is repeated.
Confirmation bias: When a post’s message aligns with a user’s worldview, they are less likely to question it or seek out opposing information.
🧵How we interpret psychological distress is shaped by the narratives around us—both cultural and medical.
This process, known as the cultural scripting of distress, involves filtering internal suffering through the frameworks available in one’s environment.
Humans are meaning-making creatures. When we’re in pain, especially when the pain is diffuse or difficult to name, we search for explanations.
Adolescents are especially susceptible to this. They are actively forming their identities while navigating intense emotional shifts.
The surrounding culture plays a significant role in how they come to understand themselves.
With the mainstreaming of transgender identity in media and public discourse, it is not surprising that more young people have begun identifying as trans.
🧵There’s an Instagram creator I follow called “Mister Mainer” who makes really funny dog videos. He puts wigs on his dogs, gives them voices, and creates characters—one of them is a realtor named Karen Bark.
The videos are very entertaining, and he’s built a large following—close to 2 million on Instagram, and over 20 million on TikTok.
Lately, though, he’s been posting nonstop leftist political content—“trans rights,” “No Kings” (promoted as protesting fascism), and anti-deportation videos.
He recently lost two sponsors because they have policies against working with political creators.
He framed it as being dropped for supporting human rights.
I’m sure he really believes that. I did too, for a brief period back in 2020, when I got swept up in the same social justice rhetoric. I had only a very superficial understanding of politics, but being part of a group gave me undeserved confidence in my views.
This isn't about human rights at all. It's about a narrow, far-left worldview that employs dishonest framing and childish tactics—claiming that if you don't agree with their approach, you oppose human rights. That kind of social pressure works on a lot of people.
🧵A key claim behind medical interventions for minors is that being transgender is innate and immutable—something you're born with and can't change.
In Skrmetti v. U.S., the Supreme Court addressed that claim. “Immutable” appears 19 times in the ruling.
In the Opinion of the Court, the Supreme Court affirmed the Sixth Circuit’s judgment, which declined to treat transgender status as a protected class—partly because it is not “defined by obvious, immutable, or distinguishing characteristics.”
Justice Barrett wrote that transgender status isn’t immutable like race or sex. It can’t be identified at birth, develops at different ages, and some people detransition. For that reason, it doesn’t qualify for heightened legal protection.