We live in a culture of selective horror. We scream at the headlines of trafficking and the depravity of the Epstein list, yet we shrug at the "routine" cutting of an infant’s genitals.
We pretend these are different worlds, different categories of morality.
They aren’t.
If you are looking for the "how" behind the most horrific acts of child exploitation, stop looking at the perpetrators and start looking at the principle.
The common denominator between ritualized mutilation and the trafficking of children is the same dark logic: The sovereignty of the individual body is a myth.
The Psychopathy of Ownership
Whether it is a sterile hospital room, a religious ritual, or a dark room in a private
island, the fundamental mechanism is identical:
The Erasure of Consent: The victim has no voice, no choice, and no way to defend their boundaries.
The Supremacy of the "Other": The child’s physical integrity is sacrificed to satisfy the desires, traditions,
or profits of an adult.
The Normalization of Trauma:
Once you accept that a child’s body can be modified or used without their permission "for their own good" or "by tradition," you have already opened the door for every other form of abuse.
A Culture of Mutilation
We wonder how people can "traffic" children, but we have spent 4,000 years "trading" their physical wholeness for social acceptance. When you institutionalize the idea that an infant’s body is public property—subject to the whims of parents, priests,
or doctors—you kill the concept of bodily autonomy at the root.
If the body isn't sovereign in the cradle, it isn't sovereign in the shadows.
The Root is Psychopathy
This is not about "culture" or "religion." It is about a deep-seated, systemic psychopathy that views life
as a commodity. It is the belief that power grants the right to supersede another human being's physical existence.
Every time we justify the "routine" cutting of a child, we are reinforcing the exact same lack of respect for life that predators use to justify their crimes.
You cannot have it both ways. You cannot claim to protect children while you participate in their institutionalized mutilation.
The "Oh my god" outrage is a lie. As long as we allow the sovereign body to be superseded by the "needs" of the collective,
we are providing the blueprint for the very monsters we claim to hate.
.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ABOUT THE JEWISH PRACTICE OF GENITAL MUTILATION - ADDITIONAL DETAILS
In the Abrahamic tradition, it became a mark of ownership.
The shift to infancy is the crucial "psychotic" turn—it ensures the victim can never remember being whole.
The "Reprisal" of Joshua: Biblical texts suggest that after the Exodus, those who were "lax" in Egypt were forced to undergo a "second" sharper circumcision. This highlights the practice as a tool of political and religious enforcement over the body.
Babylonian Wholeness: The Babylonians (along with Greeks and Romans later) famously viewed the practice as a mutilation. The Jews' refusal to conform to this "wholeness" during the exile is what turned a tribal custom into a permanent, identity-defining trauma.
THE EPSTEIN MIRROR: WHY YOUR SHOCK IS A LIE
/////////////////
The "shock" over Epstein is a hollow mask if it doesn't confront the foundational psychopathy that makes such exploitation possible.
When the headlines scream of Jeffrey Epstein’s network, the world responds with
a well-rehearsed performance of horror. We cry out, "How can this happen?" as if we aren't the same civilization that has spent millennia codifying the ownership of the vulnerable into our laws and rituals.
If you are shocked by the trafficking of children but silent about the
systematic "routine" harms we inflict on the innocent, your moral compass isn't broken—it’s non-existent.
The 4,000-Year-Old Injunction
For forty centuries, humanity has accepted a psychotic injunction: the ritual mutilation of male infants.
The Psychopathy of the Routine: Why We Mutilate Our Sons
Millions of men in the West live with the reality of genital mutilation—labeled "circumcision" to sanitize the act—without ever questioning its origin. For most, it was a sterile, hospital-room transaction:
an infant whisked away, a blade applied to the most intimate part of his body, and a lifetime of physical alteration enacted before he could speak his own name.
We are told this is "what everyone does." But we must ask: How does such madness become mundane?
The Sovereign Body vs. Institutional Psychopathy
At the heart of this practice lies a fundamental psychopathy of ownership. It is the belief that the sovereign body of an individual can be superseded by the whims, traditions, or "rituals" of the collective.
The Uncomfortable Truth: Why We’re Not Truly Shocked by Epstein
The news cycle erupts every time a new name is unsealed or a new detail of the Epstein network emerges.
The public performs a ritual of collective gasping, asking the same weary question:
"How is this possible in a civilized society?"
But if we are being honest—brutally, historically honest—we aren't shocked. We are just uncomfortable.
We live in a world that has spent 4,000 years institutionalizing the torture of infants through
ritual and routine genital mutilation. For millennia, we have accepted the physical branding and non-consensual cutting of the most vulnerable as "culture" "religion" or "tradition." We have normalized the idea that an infant’s body is not their own,
We keep asking "How is this possible?" while standing on a 4,000-year foundation of institutionalized harm.
How can we feign surprise at high-level predator rings when:
For 4,000 years, we have ritualized and routinized the physical torture of infants via genital mutilation.
For decades, we have legalized and normalized the destruction of the unborn.
Society hasn't "lost its way"—it’s following the map we drew.
When you spend millennia teaching the world that the bodies of the vulnerable are property, or that "tradition" and "convenience" trump the sanctity of life, you create the perfect ecosystem for monsters like Epstein.
The outrage is performative. The hypocrisy is systemic.
The "American Century" has encountered a structural wall. The convergence of military, geographic, and financial "vetoes" by a unified Eurasian bloc marks the transition from a unipolar world to a fragmented, multipolar reality.
1. The Geographic Veto: The 21-Mile Trigger
The Strait of Hormuz has evolved from a regional chokepoint into a global "Kill Switch."
Physics vs. Power:
Despite the presence of the U.S. "Armada," Iran has demonstrated that military superiority cannot guarantee economic security
The threat of closing the 21-mile corridor has effectively "taxed" the U.S. economy through skyrocketing insurance premiums and energy volatility.
Geography has reasserted its authority.
Washington has realized that "dusting" Iranian targets is a pyrrhic victory if the global