The reality is always the same: more state power, less free speech.
3/ The direction of travel:
🔒 under-16 social media bans
🪪 “real” age verification and digital ID
⚖️ penalties tied to what algorithms amplify
This isn’t a tweak, it’s infrastructure.
4/ Translation: once you build identity gates for speech, you don’t get to pretend it’ll stay “just for kids”.
Systems expand. Definitions widen. Enforcement hardens.
5/ And once you attach criminal risk to “harmful” content and algorithms, platforms will do one thing:
delete first, ask questions never.
That’s how lawful criticism gets chilled.
6/ Spain matters because the regime-class always reacts the same way when it’s under pressure:
control the narrative, control the gatekeepers, control the public square.
7/ So what was the CORRUPTO banner?
A giant banner hung opposite Spain’s Congress showing Pedro Sánchez’s face with one word: CORRUPTO.
A message ordinary people understood in one second.
8/ Why did it spread?
Because it gave citizens a simple phrase for what they were already thinking, and it travelled from street-level conversations to national headlines.
9/ And what happened next is the point: it was removed by court order after a complaint.
In other words, the system moved to make a message disappear.
10/ Then came the “El Capo” bus, a campaign bus branded with Sánchez as “El Capo”(the Mafia leader), mocking the cronyism and corruption of his wife and associates, taking the message through Spain’s streets where the public couldn't miss it.
11/ Why do our buses, not only in Spain, but across the world, work?
Because they say what millions think, while the political class hides behind committees, inquiries and word-games.
12/ Starmer’s Labour isn’t a bulwark against Sánchez-style politics, it’s the same family.
They’ve met, signed a bilateral framework, and Sánchez’s side literally says they’re “aligned on many policies.”
13/ And here’s the link: @hazteoir Oír is part of the same wider movement as @CitizenGO , ordinary citizens organising across borders to push back when governments, NGOs and media try to police debate and punish dissent.
14/ That’s why they hate us. Not because we’re “far right”, but because we don’t accept the progressive gatekeepers’ rulebook: say the approved words, fund the approved causes, shut up when told.
Labels are how they try to shut people down, without debating.
15/ We’re not extremists. We’re citizens who won’t be bullied into silence: on free speech, family, faith, sovereignty, and the right to disagree.
16/ If you want more of this: follow.
If you want to help us keep fighting back, support CitizenGO / Hazte Oír follow our work and share this thread. When they try to silence us, it’s because it’s working.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This may seem surreal but stay tuned. It involves a vexatious police claim, leading to my second arrest.
In 2022, a Twitter account calling itself "Rubin Remus" set up. Here's one of its posts from 31 October 2022 complaining about a Mass intention for me.
This Rubin Remus account was obsessed. It literally tracked my every move, on and off like. The entire feed was literally dedicated to me. Here is is transcribing a media interview I did.
The account was obsessive. It was pursuing a course of conduct, tagging me in and trying to get my attention, as well as making real life threats against mine and my husband's livelihoods.
🧵 1 —That Friday night legal update you’ve all been waiting for. ⚖️
Since a certain corner of X is fizzing like a dropped Aperol Spritz, here’s the calm-but-sparkly explainer of Hayden's judicial review. No mythology, no melodrama, just facts with a mischievous wink.
2
The Judicial Review argument was simple: a Crown Court judge released a certificate of conviction to a journalist without giving reasons or doing the usual privacy balancing. A clerical wobble. Bureaucracy is thrilling like that.
3
The Crown Court and MoJ eventually shrugged and said, “Yes, fair point.” This happens a lot in public law. Sometimes the paperwork does a little hop-skip when it should have done a neat pirouette.
🚨 BREAKING: The NHS is about to experiment on children again.
They’re launching a new trial to put puberty blockers into the bodies of kids as young as 10 — despite the Cass Review warning these drugs are unsafe.
We are suing to stop it.
Full story below. 👇
1/ The Cass Review was clear: the evidence for puberty blockers is “poor.”
The NHS banned routine use because the drugs weren’t safe.
So why is the NHS now launching a £10.7M trial to give the same drugs to vulnerable children?
Because they found a loophole: call it “research.”
2/ The trial will enrol 226 children, some as young as 10.
Blockers aren’t a “pause.”
Almost every child given them moves to irreversible medicalisation: hormones, infertility, and permanent loss of sexual function.
THREAD: Hayden v Heath — Hearing Summary (21 Nov 2025)
1/ Just finished listening to the Hayden v Heath hearing before Master Sullivan in the High Court’s Media & Communications List.
Here’s what actually happened 👇
2/The headline: the claim was found defective across all three causes of action. The judge accepted that defamation, harassment and GDPR are all improperly pleaded and must be rewritten.
3/ Defamation:
The judge held Hayden has NOT complied with the practice directions. You can’t annex whole articles and say “the full nine yards” are defamatory. You must identify the specific words complained of. That hasn’t been done.
The EU’s radical “Chat Control” plan, which would’ve forced WhatsApp, Signal & Telegram to scan everyone’s private messages, is now DEAD.
They backed down after a massive public backlash.
And yes - CitizenGO was part of that fight. 💪🇬🇧
Make no mistake: this was the first step toward total surveillance the same agenda behind Digital ID and Online Safety laws that threaten your privacy right here in the UK.
Once they can scan your chats, they can control what you say.
Not anymore. 👊 #Privacy #Freedom
Countries like Poland 🇵🇱, Austria 🇦🇹, the Netherlands 🇳🇱 and Germany 🇩🇪 stood firm and Denmark finally dropped mandatory chat scanning.
But the EU’s already scheming to bring back a “softer” version later this year.