1/ This breaking exclusive story from Reuters (sourced from her office) looks like an effort to retroactively justify and normalize Tulsi Gabbard's presence at the recent Georgia raid by framing it as part of a broader ODNI election security mission. I can explain:
2/ Between Feb 1–4, Gabbard told Congress her Georgia role falls under ODNI's election security authority and is tied to a long running assessment of electronic voting systems.
3/ At the same time, this newly-public Puerto Rico operation is now being highlighted as proof of that "long running" work, with ODNI emphasizing vulnerabilities and alleged foreign‑interference risks to make Georgia look like one more node in an existing program.
4/ Puerto Rico gives her a prior case where ODNI directly handled voting machines with the FBI and prosecutors, a precedent she can cite when asked why the DNI is anywhere near a county election office in Georgia.
5/ P.R. also supplies a narrative template: no confirmed foreign attack, but some vulnerabilities discovered, which supports the claim that systems are so exposed that extraordinary measures (including raids of election offices!) are justified.
6/ However, the Georgia raid is portrayed by critics as unprecedented federal interference in a past state election, with Gabbard's physical presence at the site as a particular red flag. I and many other analysts agree: this situation stinks, and she wants the smell to dissipate
7/ Being able to say "we have already done this in Puerto Rico and uncovered real problems" answers that criticism at the narrative level even if it doesn't resolve the underlying legal and constitutional objections.
8/ Trump and Gabbard both benefit from stitching Puerto Rico and Georgia into a single storyline: a long term, intelligence driven effort to secure allegedly compromised electronic systems... not a targeted intervention in Fulton County.
9/ Opponents argue the "election security" label is being used as pretext to relitigate 2020 (the most studied election in our history) in a jurisdiction Trump fixates on, revealing the Fulton operation for the obvious political meddling that it is.
10/FIN In that light, elevating the Puerto Rico case now functions less as neutral transparency and more as construction of a paper trail and technocratic cover for ODNI's Georgia role and any future seizures.
@threadreaderapp Unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tyler Shears is in the #EpsteinFiles because he directly worked PR for Epstein. He was also the CTO (and responsible for "deep dive due diligence on all new investments and company projects") at The Ingersoll Group during the time when Keith Ingersoll was committing crimes there.
Me in 2023: "If Millennials think we're having a hard time now, the madness & the chaos that would be unleashed in a 2nd Trump presidency would be unmatched by any other point in American history, & I think that none of us want to live through that"
You can see my eye twitching.
Anthony Davis: He knows he's 'Above the Law' and he kind of is.
Me: He kind of is. He kind of is. I mean, when you think about an equivalent, you could think about someone like Elon Musk.
Some stories wound me in the writing. The toll is a stress that burrows deep during research. When the weight grows unbearable, when it overwhelms, I step back, breathe, think. But I will not be ruled by fear. My allegiance is to democracy, and the stakes could not be higher.
The cunning of fear is that it needs no chains. It merely suggests that tomorrow is soon enough, that someone else will speak, and that the risk outweighs the duty. Fear stops the hand before it writes, and closes the throat before it speaks.
Fear is a thief of motion. It wins not by persuasion, but by paralysis. It whispers in our ear that stillness is safety, that silence protects. It makes cowards feel wise, inaction feel reasonable, retreat feel like strategy. So nothing moves. The moment passes, and passes again.
1/ People who believe Nicole Good was "in the wrong" for trying to drive away from a federal officer are telling us something important about themselves: they value compliance over justice.
That mindset isn’t just misguided. It’s fundamentally un-American. I can explain. 🧵👇
2/ America’s founding story wasn’t about obeying the rules, it was about challenging unjust ones. The Boston Tea Party and civil rights marches are examples of acts of defiance against oppressive power structures.
Justice has always preceded legality in our moral code.
3/ When you prioritize "following the rules" at all costs, you’re effectively saying power defines what’s right. But history shows the opposite: power often needs to be confronted to make things right.