One failed turbine at Scroby Sands exposes the scale of the cost of decommissioning offshore wind farms. And there’s precious little cash being set aside to cover it. A thread (1/n)
Scroby Sands is a relatively small 60MW offshore windfarm. In 2023 one of the 30 turbines caught fire and owner RWE has decided to decommission that single turbine (2/n)
In the accounts up to end 2024, we can see the wind farm is losing money, with pre-tax losses of £4.7m, despite earning ROC subsidies worth £9.8m, or nearly 48% of revenue (3/n)
RWE calculates the present value of decommissioning the whole wind farm (remaining 29 turbines) at £44.2m, or a cash cost of ~£58m in 2030 after unwinding the discount, or about £1m per MW of capacity (4/n)
However, they also expect the cost of decommissioning the single failed turbine at £13.2m (including £0.2m already spent), or about £6.6m/MW (5/n)
It is reasonable to expect some economies of scale when decommissioning the whole windfarm, but a six-fold decrease in costs is surely beyond the realms of credibility (6/n)
Examination of a big sample of offshore wind farms last year showed decommissioning estimates of about £0.3m/MW across the fleet. About a third of the overall £1m/MW Scroby Sands provision and much lower than the single turbine £6.6m/MW (7/n)
A response to an FOI request reveals that very little of the future decommissioning liability covered by DESNZ is being reserved as ring-fenced cash. 21% is covered by parent company guarantees that are supposed to be not acceptable to DESNZ (8/n)
The finances of these windfarms and their owners are looking increasingly shaky, especially as there is talk of ending ROCs early and cutting carbon taxes which will reduce revenue for ROC-funded windfarms (9/n)
The decommissioning cost of a single turbine in the Scroby Sands windfarm has lit the fuse on the offshore wind decommissioning timebomb. Time the Government tightens the rules on decommissioning liabilities or there's a risk the bill will fall on the taxpayer (10/n)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article on the link below (11/11). open.substack.com/pub/davidturve…
HI @threadreaderapp unroll please.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The data is in, so now we know how much the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) scheme cost us in 2024/25. A thread 🧵(1/n)
First, overall generation under the scheme was down on the year at just under 8TWh. It is beginning to look like a downtrend has been in place since 2020/21 (2/n)
The total cost of the scheme fell slightly too to £1.84bn (3/n)
If NESO cannot produce a complete set of energy scenarios and we can't rely on the costs, then what is the point of NESO. A thread (1/n)
Many green blobbers have got very huffy about my report for the IEA looking into the various estimates of the cost of Net Zero (2/n) iea.org.uk/publications/t…
Fulminator-in-chief was @ret_ward who even went even went so far as to write to the @iealondon and demand the report was withdrawn (3/n)
Another record year for CfD subsidies with £2.6bn paid out to renewables generators. Where does all the money go? A thread 🧵(1/n)
2025 was a record year, with £2.6bn paid out, up from £2.4bn in 2024. Offshore wind took the lion's share of over £2bn, with tree-burning taking £428m, dedicated biomass £118m. Onshore wind took 67m and solar £0.1m. (2/n)
September to December 2025 were also the top 4 subsidy months on record, with November 2025 being the highest month taking £311m. (3/n)
Yesterday's AR7 results show that Miliband, NESO and the CCC are gaslighting the nation. AR7 is locking in index-linked high electricity prices for decades. A thread 🧵(1/n)
So, what happened? A total of 8.4GW of offshore wind was awarded contracts. Of this 8.2GW was fixed-bottom at an average of £91/MWh in 2024 prices, with 0.2GW of floating at £216/MWh. But these prices show the price of offshore wind is rising (2/n)
AR7's 20-year index-linked contracts are only about £9/MWh above AR6's Hornsea 4 15-year contract that was cancelled as uneconomic. However, on a like for like basis AR7 would probably have cost about £105/MWh (3/n)
Alastair and Rory caught telling porkies about solar power while shilling for lossmaking Fuse Energy. When facts and truth are ignored, The Rest is Propaganda. A thread 🧵 (1/n)
The central claim of their clip was that solar is a “very cheap and affordable way to generate electricity”. But in the UK at least, that claim is manifestly untrue. Solar is in fact very expensive (2/n)
We subsidise solar in 3 ways. The basic cost of solar from feed-in-tariffs is £229/MWh for 2024/25. To that we must add £33/MWh for grid balancing and backup costs, giving a total of £282/MWh, or >3X gas-fired electricity including carbon costs (3/n)
It's the end of the year, so time to to take a light-hearted view of the past 12 months of our energy policy pantomime. A thread (1/n)
As it's Christmas, the season of goodwill, we should begin with the Prince Charming, Snow White and Cinderella of energy policy, namely Richard Tice, Kemi Badenoch and Claire Coutinho who together have collapsed the cosy consensus supporting Net Zero (2/n)
But our panto also includes Widow Twankey Ed Miliband and his sidekick Chris “Wishee Washee” Stark who keep repeating the mantra that energy bills will come down, but the audience roar back “Oh no they won’t”. (3/n)