It's gonna be a thing again, so I am juts putting the take here in advance:
The problem with the antisemitism ad is it's not capturing the reality of how Jews are experiencing antisemitism in America today.
It is not mean kids in the hallway putting well written post it notes on backpacks.
The dominant experience now is social, institutional, and cultural pressure. It shows up in schools, workplaces, activist spaces, and elite institutions that claim moral authority.
Jews are told, by these people in positions of power over them and claiming moral authority over them, that Jews are safe, privileged, and powerful, even as Jews are excluded, harassed, or asked to disavow their identity and ties to our people to participate.
Antisemitism is being laundered through respectable language.
“Anti-Zionism,” “decolonization,” and “human rights” rhetoric are used to justify things that would be unacceptable against any other minority with cultural ties to another country.
An ad that frames antisemitism as a universally condemned moral failing misses the point.
The problem is precisely that large parts of society, particularly people on the left who imagine themselves to be morally driven, do not see what they’re doing as antisemitic.
This kind of messaging, aimed at educating non-Jews about rising antisemitism, avoids the uncomfortable reality that the problem is now mainstreamed and from culturally dominant players, not immature teenagers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some thoughts on what will be a very brief media cycle about questions Harris's team asked Shapiro, a thread.
1) Very regularly in our media culture we take things out of context, pick up the spiciest sound bite, and then have very heated conversations based on out of context words attributed to a person. Let's try to put this all back into context.
A) Harris became the de facto nominee around July 22. Before that it was still Biden's campaign, not hers.
B) The vetting for Shapiro and presumably the other people being considered basically happened the next week
I keep seeing these arguments about "land sales" at synagogues and why it's "free speech" to protest them. I'd like to offer you a hypothetical using the exact same logic and you can tell me if you'd accept this conduct or defend "free speech." A thread.
1) In Mosques and leftist organizing spaces around the country, there have been many fundraisers for aid to Gaza.
We know, with a mountain of evidence, that Hamas systematically steals aid meant for civilians and has done so for decades.
In my eyes, every single fundraiser for Gaza amounts to fundraising for Hamas, a U.S. designated terrorist organization.
Basically every socialist country has indeed failed to end racism and many have committed extremely racist persecution of minorities. A short thread with a few examples.
1) The USSR built an entire hierarchy of “titular” ethnicities and treated Jews, Crimean Tatars, Chechens, Volga Germans, and others as suspect populations. Deportations, internal passports, banned languages. That is systemic racism. Russia's invasion of Ukraine is rooted in this
2) China’s PRC created a tiered system for Han vs minorities. It built a coercive system of forced assimilation for Uyghurs and Tibetans, including mass internment, forced labor, destroyed religious sites, intrusive surveillance, family separation, and sterilization campaigns.
I didn't think anyone was prepared to hear this during the election, but now that it's over I want to talk about this quote from Pirkei Avot that Brad Lander misquoted and misunderstood.
1) What is Pirkei Avot? You could translate it as Ethics of the Fathers.
It's a selection of quotes and discussions from the Mishnah.
Usually Jewish texts are focused on the law. This one could be described as a distillation of Jewish philosophy.
Pirkei Avot is full of short, punchy sayings on how to live, think, and grow.
The rabbis try to challenge assumptions. The wise aren’t the most educated, the strong aren’t the most violent, the rich aren’t the most important. Everything depends on your inner life and attitude.
Some sober thinking for New York Jews and those sympathetic to us on a Mamdani win, a thread.
1) Mamdani won in a historically high turnout election. He won 50.4% of that vote and 49.6% of votes cast were not for him.
He beat a sex pest he had already beaten in the Democratic primary and a crazy cat guy who knew he was not viable.
This dynamic is unlikely to repeat.
Many voters think solely in terms of the who won or lost binary, but the margin of victory matters. Ambitious politicians who did not run in the mayoral race are paying attention to the margin of victory. Barely eeking out a majority is not a strong deterrent.
I keep seeing leftist comedians who have a Jewish parent out for Mamdani doing the "AsAJew" shtick to mock our concerns and be volunteer tokens for this man. A thread on why I have particular contempt for these people.
1) If the only time in your life being Jewish is relevant is to disparage other Jews and their concerns, you're not behaving as a member of our community. You are playing for someone else's team *at our expense.*
I am a Jew when it's not convenient. I am a Jew wearing a kippah on Shabbat and have Jew haters with keffiyehs on more than one occasion in 2025 feeling safe spitting at me in the streets. Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn are dealing with violence from these pricks, not just disrespect.