Counsel: every action that has been mandated or warranted are work in progress, they have pointed to some actions already taken in circulars...the SOP is a critical
AG: the SOP tells the timeframe
Counsel: RBI is still to have a meeting, they have not yet deliberated
CJI: action is essence of dealing with this crime effectively, we will issue directions to deal with the SOP, meanwhile you see if any lacunea are left
Counsel : this is a consensus -meidated process, all stakeholders are on board, the only thing is- the action to be taken pursuant to lacunea pointed out, that still has to be taken
CJI: today we are at the stage of formulation of policies and rules, onces those are implemented we will see
CJI: Ld AG has placed on record a compilation containing the status report on behalf of the MHA, UOI, along with documents R1-R5 , annexure R1 is the true copy of the ministerial meeting, 2nd meeting of IDC on 2nd Feb 2026; R2 is the copy of detailed inputs in respect of the solution of committee; R3 is the detailed books and copy of material; R5 is the copy of the SOP for restoration of money and grievance redressal
CJI: it is explained that an IDC has been constituted , CBI has identified losses of Rs 10 crores of more for investigation of digital arrest cases, such cases are identified in Gujarat and Delhi, we direct the state of Gujarat and NCT Delhi to upload the SOPs within 1 week
CJI notes that central agencies are in the final stages of finallising MOU on the issue
CJI: we will appreciate if the draft MOU is finalised within 4 weeks or so
CJI: Similarly, RBI has drafted an SOP prescribing action by them of placing a temporary hold on accounts to prevent cyber fraud, money leak activities
CJI: we direct that MHA to formally adopte and implement the SOP dated 2nd January 2026 and same be issued across the country for strengthening inter-agency co-ordination and ensure restoration of funds wherever possible
CJI: all the HCs will ensure compliance with the SOP
CJI: Ministry of Technology is directed to finalise the guidelines and the portal within 4 weeks
CJI: so far the future course of action is concerned, we direct the CBI to list the idenfied digital arrest places for investigation; RBI is directed to examine the transactions and take appropriate decision in this regard. The MEIT is directed ensure time-bound compliance
CJI: we direct the RBI, depart of revenue to consider the desirability of suspending suspicious transactions
CJI: RBI, DoT, etc may also jointly hold a meeting to come up with a framework for the compensation in the digital arrest cases , a pragmatic and liberal approach is to be adopted
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt to hear today a batch of petitions related to #WestBengalSIR, including WB Chief Minister #MamataBanerjee's plea raising issues inter-alia about characterization of voters in the 'logical discrepancy' list
A PIL by 'Sanatani Sangsad' seeking deployment of state police officials under ECI till publication of final roll also listed before the bench. The ECI has filed a counter in this case, alleging violence, intimidation and obstruction in SIR duties in West Bengal
Last week, CM #MamataBanerjee appeared in person before the Court and argued that West Bengal was being targeted ahead of State Assembly elections
She particularly raised concerns about characterization of voters in a "logical discrepancy" category by the ECI over minor name spelling mismatches, most of which were allegedly attributable to translation from Bengali/local dialect to English.
#SupremeCourt hears the issue of reservation for women lawyers in Bar Council Elections
CJI: the representation from 30 to anythign we are not going to change
Counsel: BCI or BCD cannot be a particular body which can decide to co-opt...only 23 can be elected, remaining 2 can be anyone...when women candidate are to be co-opted- there are so many in the frame, it is women against women
Counsel: election is a democratic process, out of the 2 someone is nominated, is it not heart burning for the others running the campaign, the two co-opted posts cannot be for women, let it go to the general candidates
#SupremeCourt to hear today Prashant Kishor’s Jan Suraaj Party’s petition challenging #Bihar assembly elections.
They contend that election was vitiated due to announcement of Rs 10K transfer to women during MCC period. They seek fresh elections.
@PrashantKishor
#BiharElections matter taken up
Sr Adv CU Singh (for Jan Suraaj): The point which arises here is...what your lordships are seized of in Upadhyay matter etc. - freebies matter...
J Bagchi: In which clause of S.100 will your election petition fall?
CJI: Suppose someone files election petition in time
Singh: Level playing field on the face of it...creating situation where there's complete disparity...in a fiscal deficit state...most indebted state...to pay 15,600 crores in immediate pre-election time...adding to future debt, with no budgetary support.
#SupremeCourt #PrashantKishor
CJI: We can't issue notice like this. There has to be a format of entertaining a petition. It has to be shown in election petition that particular candidate has been benefited...and that amounts to corrupt practice.
Singh: I am not on corrupt practice alone...I am also on Model Code of Conduct being disturbed across state...these are subject of judicial review, not election petition
CJI: What is the logic of not going to High Court? It can verify anything and take view. It's not a pan-India issue
Singh: Your lordships are seized of the issue in similar cases.
Kerala High Court continues hearing plea by father of accused in Venjaramoodu Mass Murder case challenging release of movie allegedly inspired by the case
#SupremeCourt hears challenge to Karnataka HC order which set aside the 2023 election of Congress Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) K Y Nanjegowda representing Malur constituency (Kolar district).
Sr Adv AM Singhvi for the petitioner
CJI: is it the recount or before recount (referring to document in sealed cover)
#SupremeCourt hears petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government challenging the Madras High Court's order which stayed the operation of State amendments taking away the Governor's power to appoint Vice-Chancellors of State-run Universities
Sr Advocate AM Singhvi for TN State
CJI: Mr Naidu is it correct that after 5 days, the writ petition was allowed without hearing on merits?