SuicideBlonde Profile picture
Feb 10 13 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/13

Long overdue annual update on Midstream returns on capital deployed.

Period covered: 2018 to 2025

Companies Covered: $KMI, $OKE, $LNG, $WMB, $TRGP, $EPD, $ET, $MPLX, $PAA

Last year's Analysis/Thread below for reference:

2/13

Methodology:

a) Compute ∆ EBITDA b/w Q3'25 & Q3'18
b) Annualize change in (a) = cumulative EBITDA growth
c) Calculate Total Capital Deployed b/w 2018 and 2024 = CAPEX + Acquisitions (incl. stock-for-stock) - Divestitures

Return = ∆ Annualized EBITDA ÷ Capital Deployed
3/13

Starting with $KMI, between 2018 and 2024:

Capital Deployed = $15 billion
∆ EBITDA = $400 $600 million
Return = 2.7% to 4.0%

Return for the 2018 to 2023 period = 0% to 1.6%

Improving trajectory for sure...let's see if this can continue Image
Image
4/13

Looking at $OKE next, b/w 2018 & 2024:

Capital Deployed = $41.9 billion (includes $ENLC purchase which closed in Q1'25)
∆ EBITDA = $5.8 to $6.0 billion
Return = 13.8% to 14.3%

Return during 2018-2023 = 11.5% to 12.1%

Looks like $MMP synergies are coming through Image
Image
5/13

Next up $LNG. Between 2018 and 2024:

Capital Deployed = $16 billion
∆ EBITDA = $4.0 to $4.2 billion
Return = 25.0% to 26.3%

Return during 2018-2023 = 26.2% to 29.2%

Continued weakening of TTF & JKL pricing has reduced marketing margins Image
Image
6/13

Let's check $WMB next. Between 2018 & 2024:

Capital Deployed = $20.7 billion
∆ EBITDA = $2.8 to $3.0 billion
Return = 13.5% to 14.5%

Return during 2018-2023 = 12.0% to 13.3%

Nice comeback in returns - driven by projects coming online especially Deepwater GoM Image
Image
7/13

Let's finish the C-corps with $TRGP. Between 2018 & 2024:

Capital Deployed = $20 billion (incl. purchase of Badlands stake from Blackstone)
∆ EBITDA = $3.6 to $3.8 billion
Return = 18.0% to 19.0%

Return during 2018-2023 = 18.0% to 19.3%

Maintaining strong returns Image
Image
8/13

Turning to MLPs, first up $EPD. Between 2018 and 2024:

Capital Deployed = $28.1 billion
∆ EBITDA = $2.0 to $2.2 billion
Return = 7.1% to 7.8%

Return during 2018-2023 = 8.8% to 9.6%

All is not well in the base business - more competition in the Permian Image
Image
9/13

Now for $ET - the biggest of them all. Between 2018 & 2024:

Capital Deployed = $62.3 billion (incl. NuStar purchase by $SUN)
∆ EBITDA = $4.8 to $5.2 billion
Return = 7.7% to 8.3%

Return during 2018-2023 = 10.7% to 11.6%

Competition hurting base business esp. Permian Image
Image
10/13

Next, let's look at $MPLX. Between 2018 & 2024:

Capital Deployed = $25.6 billion
∆ EBITDA = $3.2 to $3.4 billion
Return = 12.5% to 13.3%

Return during 2018-2023 = 12.4% to 13.2%

Returns holding steady but acquisitions jumped in 2025. So let's see... Image
Image
11/13

Finally, let's look at $PAA. Between 2018 & 2024:

Capital Deployed = $6 billion
∆ EBITDA = $100 mm to $200 mm
Return = 1.7% to 3.3%

Return during 2018-2023 = 0.0% to 2.2%

Slight improvement but a long way to go still... Image
Image
12/13

Evolution of returns shown in Table below. Image
13/13

$TRGP and $LNG are tops
$WMB and $OKE - strong returns despite high M&A activity - indicates good synergy capture
$ET and $EPD - Disappointing drop in returns - perhaps undercutting each other
$MPLX - Solid but recent M&A bears watching
$KMI - Improving
$PAA - Weak

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SuicideBlonde

SuicideBlonde Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Suicide95518428

Aug 29, 2024
(1/11)

Big transaction in Midstream-land with $OKE acquiring a 43% + GP interest in $ENLC and Medallion Pipeline from GIP for a combined value of $5.9 billion

Let's explore transaction economics beyond the headline numbers quoted in the PR/Presentation

🧵
(2/11)

$OKE presentation states that the $ENLC units + GP interest purchase are being executed at 8.3x 2025 EBITDA and Medallion purchase is being executed at 6.3x 2025 EBITDA

BOTH multiples INCLUSIVE of Base Case SYNERGIES which are, in aggregate, expected to be $250 mm
(3/11)

Looking at $ENLC purchase first:

2024 Guidance Midpoint = $1.36 bn
Purchase Price for Units = $14.90/unit
Units O/s = 456 mm
Common Unit Value = $6.80 bn
GP Value = $300 mm
Debt = $4.7 bn
Pref Capital = $1.1 bn
Ent. Val. = $12.9 bn

Multiple on 2024G = 9.5x
Read 11 tweets
Mar 7, 2024
1/21

$HES - or more specifically, their 30% Working Interest in Guyana position is at the center of the battle between $XOM and $CVX with the matter of $XOM's ROFR now in arbitration.

I estimate $HES Guyana could be worth $30 to $32 billion.

Let's see why/how. A (long) 🧵
2/21

First: A review of the Guyana Production Sharing Contract

1) Royalty Rate of 2.00%
2) 75.00% Cost Oil Cap
3) 50.00% of Profit Oil to $XOM, $HES, $CNOOC collectively
4) Most Important: NO RING-FENCING
3/21

$XOM is the operator and they have identified 11 billion barrels of total resource and across 10 potential projects

Of these, 3 projects are currently online: Liza 1, Liza 2, and Payara

The fourth project - Yellowtail - should be on-stream later this year Image
Read 21 tweets
Nov 21, 2023
(1/17) Poor capital allocation has long been a source of consternation for US Energy Midstream investors. Starting 2018, the market started pushing back against the sector and the COVID pandemic provided an impetus for change. Has the sector changed its ways? A 🧵
(2/17)

For this exercise, I examine the capital deployment record of major US Midstream C-corps and MLPs since 2018

US C-corps examined: $KMI, $LNG, $OKE, $TRGP, $WMB

US MLPs examined: $EPD, $ET, $MPLX, $PAA
(3/17)

For capital deployment, I looked at cumulative CAPEX, Acquisitions, Divestitures as well as Corporate M&A

For return on capital deployed I took the change in EBITDA between Q3'23 and Q3'18 and annualized the change

Return = Annualized ∆EBITDA/Capital Deployed
Read 17 tweets
Oct 21, 2023
(1/17)

Here is a thread discussing midstream economics across commodities and service types that will hopefully debunk some of the absurdities being thrown around. Long thread:



cc: @Sarah4RRC , @willrayvalentin , @NiceQuarterGuys
(2/17)

Let's start with crude oil gathering. Rates can vary anywhere b/w $0.60/bbl to $1.25/bbl. This data is based on my experience looking at $PAA over the years. The rate in the Permian is closer to $1.25/bbl while in places like the Eagle Ford, it is closer to $0.60/bbl.
(3/17)

So what drives the difference between $1.25/bbl and $0.60/bbl? Very simply, cost of building gathering lines. Older systems are cheaper. Midstream companies will require acreage dedication to proceed with these projects.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 28, 2023
(1/13)

$TRP.TO out with an announcement to spin-off their Liquids Pipelines business.

A quick thread summarizing some of my thoughts on the SpinCo's valuation, future strategic direction, etc.
(2/13)

The Liquids Pipelines business is a c. C$1.3 to 1.4 billion EBITDA business with the Keystone system being the crown jewel.

Highly contracted assets linking low-decline oil sands production to high-complexity refining centers in the US.

Vital alternative to $ENB.TO
(3/13)

From all accounts, it is a "capital light" business with only about C$100 mm budgeted for 2023 (and 2022 wasn't particularly heavy either)

Growth opportunities may be limited given CTS resolution on $ENB.TO Mainline and TMX Expansion
Read 13 tweets
Mar 23, 2022
(1/15) Will try to provide my humble (and probably wrong opinion) on the question posed by QDC and Ed Morse’s bearish oil view. Thread 🧵

(2/15) Firstly, w.r.t demand:

The main regions of demand growth are India and China.

China oil imports (Bloomberg) totaled ~508 million MT over LTM vs. 505 million MT in 2019

India’s been slower to recover and is running about -7% vs. 2019 (excl. LPGs) - data per Govt data
(3/15) Both India and China are poor vs. even some of their Asian counterparts. Therefore, the case for secular growth in China and India is a reasonable one.

India has the added tailwind of growing population.

Now think about Bangladesh, Indonesia, Philippines & Vietnam
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(