a) Compute ∆ EBITDA b/w Q3'25 & Q3'18
b) Annualize change in (a) = cumulative EBITDA growth
c) Calculate Total Capital Deployed b/w 2018 and 2024 = CAPEX + Acquisitions (incl. stock-for-stock) - Divestitures
Return = ∆ Annualized EBITDA ÷ Capital Deployed
3/13
Starting with $KMI, between 2018 and 2024:
Capital Deployed = $15 billion
∆ EBITDA = $400 $600 million
Return = 2.7% to 4.0%
Return for the 2018 to 2023 period = 0% to 1.6%
Improving trajectory for sure...let's see if this can continue
4/13
Looking at $OKE next, b/w 2018 & 2024:
Capital Deployed = $41.9 billion (includes $ENLC purchase which closed in Q1'25)
∆ EBITDA = $5.8 to $6.0 billion
Return = 13.8% to 14.3%
Return during 2018-2023 = 11.5% to 12.1%
Looks like $MMP synergies are coming through
5/13
Next up $LNG. Between 2018 and 2024:
Capital Deployed = $16 billion
∆ EBITDA = $4.0 to $4.2 billion
Return = 25.0% to 26.3%
Return during 2018-2023 = 26.2% to 29.2%
Continued weakening of TTF & JKL pricing has reduced marketing margins
6/13
Let's check $WMB next. Between 2018 & 2024:
Capital Deployed = $20.7 billion
∆ EBITDA = $2.8 to $3.0 billion
Return = 13.5% to 14.5%
Return during 2018-2023 = 12.0% to 13.3%
Nice comeback in returns - driven by projects coming online especially Deepwater GoM
7/13
Let's finish the C-corps with $TRGP. Between 2018 & 2024:
Capital Deployed = $20 billion (incl. purchase of Badlands stake from Blackstone)
∆ EBITDA = $3.6 to $3.8 billion
Return = 18.0% to 19.0%
Return during 2018-2023 = 18.0% to 19.3%
Maintaining strong returns
8/13
Turning to MLPs, first up $EPD. Between 2018 and 2024:
Capital Deployed = $28.1 billion
∆ EBITDA = $2.0 to $2.2 billion
Return = 7.1% to 7.8%
Return during 2018-2023 = 8.8% to 9.6%
All is not well in the base business - more competition in the Permian
9/13
Now for $ET - the biggest of them all. Between 2018 & 2024:
Capital Deployed = $62.3 billion (incl. NuStar purchase by $SUN)
∆ EBITDA = $4.8 to $5.2 billion
Return = 7.7% to 8.3%
Return during 2018-2023 = 10.7% to 11.6%
Competition hurting base business esp. Permian
10/13
Next, let's look at $MPLX. Between 2018 & 2024:
Capital Deployed = $25.6 billion
∆ EBITDA = $3.2 to $3.4 billion
Return = 12.5% to 13.3%
Return during 2018-2023 = 12.4% to 13.2%
Returns holding steady but acquisitions jumped in 2025. So let's see...
11/13
Finally, let's look at $PAA. Between 2018 & 2024:
Capital Deployed = $6 billion
∆ EBITDA = $100 mm to $200 mm
Return = 1.7% to 3.3%
Return during 2018-2023 = 0.0% to 2.2%
Slight improvement but a long way to go still...
12/13
Evolution of returns shown in Table below.
13/13
$TRGP and $LNG are tops
$WMB and $OKE - strong returns despite high M&A activity - indicates good synergy capture
$ET and $EPD - Disappointing drop in returns - perhaps undercutting each other
$MPLX - Solid but recent M&A bears watching
$KMI - Improving
$PAA - Weak
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Big transaction in Midstream-land with $OKE acquiring a 43% + GP interest in $ENLC and Medallion Pipeline from GIP for a combined value of $5.9 billion
Let's explore transaction economics beyond the headline numbers quoted in the PR/Presentation
🧵
(2/11)
$OKE presentation states that the $ENLC units + GP interest purchase are being executed at 8.3x 2025 EBITDA and Medallion purchase is being executed at 6.3x 2025 EBITDA
BOTH multiples INCLUSIVE of Base Case SYNERGIES which are, in aggregate, expected to be $250 mm
(3/11)
Looking at $ENLC purchase first:
2024 Guidance Midpoint = $1.36 bn
Purchase Price for Units = $14.90/unit
Units O/s = 456 mm
Common Unit Value = $6.80 bn
GP Value = $300 mm
Debt = $4.7 bn
Pref Capital = $1.1 bn
Ent. Val. = $12.9 bn
$HES - or more specifically, their 30% Working Interest in Guyana position is at the center of the battle between $XOM and $CVX with the matter of $XOM's ROFR now in arbitration.
I estimate $HES Guyana could be worth $30 to $32 billion.
Let's see why/how. A (long) 🧵
2/21
First: A review of the Guyana Production Sharing Contract
1) Royalty Rate of 2.00% 2) 75.00% Cost Oil Cap 3) 50.00% of Profit Oil to $XOM, $HES, $CNOOC collectively 4) Most Important: NO RING-FENCING
3/21
$XOM is the operator and they have identified 11 billion barrels of total resource and across 10 potential projects
Of these, 3 projects are currently online: Liza 1, Liza 2, and Payara
The fourth project - Yellowtail - should be on-stream later this year
(1/17) Poor capital allocation has long been a source of consternation for US Energy Midstream investors. Starting 2018, the market started pushing back against the sector and the COVID pandemic provided an impetus for change. Has the sector changed its ways? A 🧵
(2/17)
For this exercise, I examine the capital deployment record of major US Midstream C-corps and MLPs since 2018
US C-corps examined: $KMI, $LNG, $OKE, $TRGP, $WMB
US MLPs examined: $EPD, $ET, $MPLX, $PAA
(3/17)
For capital deployment, I looked at cumulative CAPEX, Acquisitions, Divestitures as well as Corporate M&A
For return on capital deployed I took the change in EBITDA between Q3'23 and Q3'18 and annualized the change
Here is a thread discussing midstream economics across commodities and service types that will hopefully debunk some of the absurdities being thrown around. Long thread:
Let's start with crude oil gathering. Rates can vary anywhere b/w $0.60/bbl to $1.25/bbl. This data is based on my experience looking at $PAA over the years. The rate in the Permian is closer to $1.25/bbl while in places like the Eagle Ford, it is closer to $0.60/bbl.
(3/17)
So what drives the difference between $1.25/bbl and $0.60/bbl? Very simply, cost of building gathering lines. Older systems are cheaper. Midstream companies will require acreage dedication to proceed with these projects.
The main regions of demand growth are India and China.
China oil imports (Bloomberg) totaled ~508 million MT over LTM vs. 505 million MT in 2019
India’s been slower to recover and is running about -7% vs. 2019 (excl. LPGs) - data per Govt data
(3/15) Both India and China are poor vs. even some of their Asian counterparts. Therefore, the case for secular growth in China and India is a reasonable one.
India has the added tailwind of growing population.
Now think about Bangladesh, Indonesia, Philippines & Vietnam