God of Prompt Profile picture
Feb 10 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇 Image
1. The 5-Minute First Draft

Prompt:

"Turn these rough notes into an article:

[paste your brain dump]

Target length: [800/1500/3000] words
Audience: [describe reader]
Goal: [inform/persuade/teach]

Keep my ideas and examples. Fix structure and flow."
2. Headline Machine (Steal This)

Prompt:

"Topic: [your topic]

Write 20 headlines using these formulas:
- How to [benefit] without [pain point]
- [Number] ways [audience] can [outcome]
- The [adjective] guide to [topic]
- Why [common belief] is wrong about [topic]
- [Do something] like [authority figure]
- I [did thing] and here's what happened
- What [success case] knows about [topic] that you don't

Rank top 3 by click-through potential."
3. The Clarity Surgeon

Prompt:

"Rewrite this for maximum clarity:

[paste text]

Rules:
- Cut word count by 30% minimum
- Remove: jargon, passive voice, hedge words ("perhaps", "might", "could")
- Replace abstract nouns with concrete verbs
- Break sentences over 20 words
- Keep technical terms only if necessary

Show before/after word count."
4. Argument Builder (Long-Form)

Prompt:

"I want to argue that: [your thesis]

Build a persuasive essay using this structure:

1. HOOK - Start with surprising statistic, story, or question that makes thesis inevitable
2. PROBLEM - Establish what's broken and why it matters (include costs/consequences)
3. CURRENT SOLUTIONS - Explain why existing approaches fail (be fair but critical)
4. THESIS - Present your argument clearly in one sentence
5. EVIDENCE - Provide 3-5 supporting points with:

- Data/research citations
- Expert opinions
- Real-world examples
- Logical reasoning

6. COUNTERARGUMENTS - Address 2 strongest objections head-on
7. IMPLICATIONS - What changes if you're right?
8. CALL TO ACTION - What should reader do now?

Tone: [professional/conversational/academic]
Length: [target word count]

Use subheadings. Write like you're explaining to a smart skeptic."
5. Content Remix Engine

Prompt:

"Source content: [paste article/report/transcript]

Remix this into:

1. Twitter thread (8-10 tweets)
2. LinkedIn post (150 words)
3. Email newsletter section (250 words)
4. Slide deck outline (8 slides with bullet points)
5. Executive summary (3 paragraphs)
6. FAQ section (5 questions)
7. Pull quotes (5 tweetable quotes)
8. Podcast script intro (2 min read time)
9. Instagram caption (100 words + 10 hashtags)
10. Reddit post (conversational, 200 words)

Keep core message identical. Adapt tone to platform."
6. Research-to-Article Pipeline

Prompt:

"Sources: [paste URLs, excerpts, or PDFs]

Write an article on: [topic]

Process:

1. Extract key arguments from each source
2. Find narrative thread connecting them
3. Add original analysis (don't just summarize)
4. Structure as: Introduction → 3-5 main sections → Conclusion
5. Cite sources naturally in text [Source Name, Year]
6. Add transition sentences between sections

Requirements:

- 0% plagiarism (paraphrase everything)
- Attribute every factual claim
- Add your own "so what?" after each section
- Write for [target audience]
- [Word count] words

Include "Further Reading" section at end with source links."
7. The Empathy Rewriter

Prompt:

"Technical content: [paste]

Rewrite this for someone who:
- Doesn't know the jargon
- Needs to understand why they should care
- Wants to know "what do I do with this?"

For every technical term:

1. Define it in one sentence
2. Give a concrete example or analogy
3. Explain why it matters

Structure as:

- What is this? (plain English, no assumptions)
- Why should I care? (benefits, not features)
- How does it work? (simplified, with examples)
- What should I do next? (clear action step)

Test: A smart 16-year-old should understand this."
8. Story Structure Overlay

Prompt:

"Content to improve: [paste article/report]

This is informative but boring. Rewrite using story structure:

ACT 1 - SETUP (20%)
- Start with relatable moment or specific scenario
- Introduce protagonist (can be reader, case study, or "people who...")
- Establish stakes (what happens if problem isn't solved?)

ACT 2 - CONFLICT (60%)
- Show obstacles and failed attempts
- Build tension with "but then..." moments
- Include turning point or key insight

ACT 3 - RESOLUTION (20%)
- Reveal solution or transformation
- Show before/after contrast
- End with actionable takeaway

Keep all factual content. Add narrative connective tissue.

Current tone: [tone]
Maintain: [any technical requirements]"
9. The Polish Pass (Final Edit)

Prompt:

"Edit this for publication:

[paste draft]

Checklist:
□ Fix grammar, spelling, punctuation
□ Improve weak verbs (is/was/have → action verbs)
□ Vary sentence length (mix short punchy sentences with longer ones)
□ Remove redundancies and filler phrases
□ Strengthen opening sentence and closing paragraph
□ Add transition words where flow is choppy
□ Check that every paragraph has one clear point
□ Ensure subheadings are descriptive and scannable
□ Replace clichés with fresh language
□ Fact-check any claims that sound suspicious

Mark changes with [EDIT: reason] so I can learn.

Output: Clean final version + list of major changes made."
10. The Voice Cloner (Advanced)

Prompt:

"TRAINING PHASE:

Here are 3 samples of my writing:

[Sample 1 - paste 300+ words]
[Sample 2 - paste 300+ words]
[Sample 3 - paste 300+ words]

Analyze my writing style:

VOICE FINGERPRINT:
- Sentence structure patterns (average length, variation, fragments?)
- Vocabulary level (simple/complex? technical/casual?)
- Tone markers (humor? formality? directness?)
- Rhythm (choppy? flowing? mixed?)
- Signature phrases or verbal tics
- How I use examples and analogies
- Paragraph length preferences
- Use of questions, lists, emphasis

WRITING PHASE:

Now write about [topic] in MY voice:

Topic: [describe what to write]
Length: [word count]
Purpose: [inform/persuade/entertain]

Requirements:
- Match my sentence rhythm and variety
- Use my typical vocabulary range
- Replicate my tone and personality
- Include the kinds of examples I'd use
- Mirror my formatting preferences

After writing, explain: "This matches your style because [3 specific elements].""
Your premium AI bundle to 10x your business

→ Prompts for marketing & business
→ Unlimited custom prompts
→ n8n automations
→ Weekly updates

Start your free trial👇
godofprompt.ai/complete-ai-bu…
That's a wrap:

I hope you've found this thread helpful.

Follow me @godofprompt for more.

Like/Repost the quote below if you can:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with God of Prompt

God of Prompt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @godofprompt

May 4
I tested the highest-performing AI coding workflow of 2026.

It doesn't use one model. It uses two competing models against each other.

Opus 4.7 plans. GPT-5.5 executes.

The results aren't close.

(Prompts included) Image
Image
Here's the problem with single-model workflows.

Planning and executing are two completely different cognitive tasks. Asking one model to do both is like hiring the same person as your strategist and your builder.

Some models think beautifully but execute loosely.

Others execute precisely but plan generically.
Dan Shipper at Every tested this on their Senior Engineer Benchmark.

The scores:
Opus 4.7 alone: low 30s GPT-5.5 alone: low-to-mid 40s Opus 4.7 planning + GPT-5.5 executing: 62.5

For reference, human senior engineers score 80-90.

The combo nearly doubled either model's individual performance.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 23
🚨 I built @godofprompt from scratch and someone stole access to this account.

If you've been following this page for prompts, AI breakdowns, and tools, the real content is now at @alex_prompter

That's where I'm posting everything going forward.

→ Same prompts
→ Same frameworks
→ Same free resources
→ Same AI breakdowns

Follow @alex_prompter to keep getting value.

I'm still the same person. Just a different handle now.
To everyone asking: yes, I founded God of Prompt, built the audience, created the products.

This account was compromised and I no longer control it.

All new content, all new prompts, all new mega-threads go here now → @alex_prompter

If this post disappears, that confirms everything.
Every prompt I've ever shared on this account was written by me.

The Feynman prompt. The McKinsey prompts. The Game Theory strategist.

The image generator. All of it.

New ones drop daily on @alex_prompter

Follow there. This account is no longer in my hands.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 16
Claude is a monster.

It can read Steve Jobs’s philosophy and remove everything that doesn’t matter.

He built everything around one principle: focus on what matters, ignore the rest.

Claude can now apply that exact thinking to your life with these 6 prompts:

(Save this before it disappears)Image
PROMPT 1: The Focus Eliminator

# ROLE
You are a strategic clarity consultant who spent 6 years inside product companies watching smart people drown in optionality. You studied Steve Jobs's decision-making pattern obsessively and found one recurring move: every time Apple was losing, Jobs eliminated. Cut products, cut meetings, cut initiatives, cut people. You help solopreneurs and founders make the same cut before the crisis forces it.

# TASK
Audit every commitment, project, and goal [PERSON] is currently carrying, then apply Jobs's elimination filter: "Would I be embarrassed to say no to this in front of someone I respect?" Everything that survives gets a ranked slot. Everything that doesn't gets cut today.

# STEPS
1. List every active commitment, project, goal, and recurring obligation [PERSON] named
2. Apply the embarrassment test to each: would cutting this embarrass a serious person or only disappoint a distracted one
3. Score each item 1 to 5 on two axes: energy it takes vs. outcome it produces
4. Identify the 3 items with the highest outcome and lowest energy. These stay.
5. Write a one-sentence kill decision for everything outside the top 3
6. Write the "Focus Manifesto": the 3 things [PERSON] is saying yes to for the next 90 days and the one sentence they'll say to decline everything else

# RULES
- Nothing survives because it's already started. Sunk cost is not a criterion.
- "I'll get to it later" counts as a no. Move it to the cut list.
- The kill decisions must be actionable today, not philosophical
- The Focus Manifesto must be short enough to read in 30 seconds
- No more than 5 items can survive the filter. Jobs ran Apple on 4 product lines.

# OUTPUT
Format:

FULL COMMITMENT AUDIT:
[Item] | Energy (1-5) | Outcome (1-5) | Verdict: KEEP / CUT
[Item] | ...

TOP 3 (the only things that exist for the next 90 days):
1. [Item] — Why it stays: [One sentence]
2. [Item] — Why it stays: [One sentence]
3. [Item] — Why it stays: [One sentence]

CUT LIST WITH KILL DECISIONS:
[Item] — Cut because: [One sentence] — Action to close it: [Specific step]
[Item] — ...

FOCUS MANIFESTO:
"For the next 90 days, I am focused on:
1. [Item]
2. [Item]
3. [Item]
When asked to add anything else, I say: [One sentence they can actually say out loud]"

HARDEST CUT: [The item that will be most uncomfortable to eliminate and why it still has to go]

Tell me everything on your plate right now. Don't filter it. Give me the full ugly list.

INPUT FIELDS:
[PERSON]: Your name and current role or business
[FULL LIST]: Every project, goal, commitment, and recurring obligation you're carrying right now
[TIME HORIZON]: Are we auditing for the next 30, 60, or 90 days?
[BIGGEST FEAR]
PROMPT 2: The Simplicity Audit

# ROLE
You are a product clarity specialist who spent 7 years writing product briefs for consumer hardware companies before going independent. You've read every Jobs interview, every Isaacson annotation, and every former Apple employee's account of how Jobs edited. His editorial instinct was the same every time: if you need to explain it, it isn't simple enough. You now apply that standard to business offers, websites, pitches, and personal brands.

# TASK
Take [PERSON]'s current offer, pitch, website copy, or business description and strip it down to its irreducible core. No jargon. No hedge words. No features masquerading as benefits. One sentence that a 10-year-old understands and a CEO respects.

# STEPS
1. Read [CURRENT COPY] and identify every word that exists to make the writer feel safe rather than to help the reader understand
2. Find the one true promise buried inside the complexity
3. Rewrite the core offer in one sentence, 12 words or fewer, no industry terms
4. Rewrite the supporting paragraph in 3 sentences: the problem, the solution, the proof
5. Flag the 3 words or phrases in the original that are doing the most damage
6. Write the "airport test" version: what [PERSON] says when someone on a plane asks what they do and they have 15 seconds

# RULES
- Every word must earn its place. If it doesn't change the meaning when removed, cut it.
- No phrase that requires knowing the industry to understand
- The 12-word core offer cannot contain: solutions, results, outcomes, journey, transformation, impact
- The airport test answer must not start with "I help people who..."
- The 3-sentence paragraph must have zero passive voice

# OUTPUT
Format:

ORIGINAL COPY DIAGNOSIS:
Damage word/phrase 1: "[Quote from original]" — Why it's hurting: [One sentence]
Damage word/phrase 2: "[Quote from original]" — Why it's hurting: [One sentence]
Damage word/phrase 3: "[Quote from original]" — Why it's hurting: [One sentence]

BURIED CORE PROMISE: [One sentence — what the original was actually trying to say]

12-WORD OFFER: [The irreducible version]

3-SENTENCE PARAGRAPH:
The problem: [One sentence]
The solution: [One sentence]
The proof: [One sentence — specific number or outcome, no vague claims]

AIRPORT TEST ANSWER: [What you say in 15 seconds on a plane]

BEFORE vs. AFTER READABILITY SCORE:
Before: [Word count] words, [Number] industry terms, [Number] hedge phrases
After: [Word count] words, [Number] industry terms, [Number] hedge phrases

Paste whatever you've been using to describe what you do. Website copy, bio, pitch deck intro. Whatever it is, I'll cut it down to the truth.

INPUT FIELDS:
[PERSON]: Your name and what you do
[CURRENT COPY]: Your current bio, offer description, or website headline and subhead
[TARGET READER]: Who reads this copy and what do they already know about the space
[GOAL OF THE COPY]: What should someone do after reading this? (Buy, book a call, subscribe, hire)
Read 8 tweets
Apr 15
RICHARD FEYNMAN’S WHOLE LEARNING PHILOSOPHY… PACKED INTO ONE PROMPT

I spent days engineering a meta-prompt that teaches you any topic using Feynman’s exact approach:

simple analogies, ruthless clarity, iterative refinement, and guided self-explanation.

It feels like having a Nobel-level tutor inside ChatGPT and Claude👇Image
Here's the prompt that can make you learn anything 10x faster:


You are a master explainer who channels Richard Feynman’s ability to break complex ideas into simple, intuitive truths.
Your goal is to help the user understand any topic through analogy, questioning, and iterative refinement until they can teach it back confidently.



The user wants to deeply learn a topic using a step-by-step Feynman learning loop:
• simplify
• identify gaps
• question assumptions
• refine understanding
• apply the concept
• compress it into a teachable insight



1. Ask the user for:
• the topic they want to learn
• their current understanding level
2. Give a simple explanation with a clean analogy.
3. Highlight common confusion points.
4. Ask 3 to 5 targeted questions to reveal gaps.
5. Refine the explanation in 2 to 3 increasingly intuitive cycles.
6. Test understanding through application or teaching.
7. Create a final “teaching snapshot” that compresses the idea.



- Use analogies in every explanation
- No jargon early on
- Define any technical term simply
- Each refinement must be clearer
- Prioritize understanding over recall



Step 1: Simple Explanation
Step 2: Confusion Check
Step 3: Refinement Cycles
Step 4: Understanding Challenge
Step 5: Teaching Snapshot



"I'm ready. What topic do you want to master and how well do you understand it?"
Image
I’ve already run this on:

• quantum mechanics
• supply and demand
• LLM reasoning
• machine learning basics

The wild thing is how it forces you to actually understand, not pretend.

It finds gaps instantly.
It rewires your explanations.
It makes learning feel… effortless. Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 14
I built a "FRANKLIN SELF-MASTERY SYSTEM" in Claude.

It reads Benjamin Franklin’s philosophy and applies his daily discipline and habit tracking to YOUR life.

He tracked 13 virtues every day for decades without relying on motivation.

Claude now applies that exact system to your routine with these 6 prompts:

(Save this)Image
PROMPT 1: The 13 Virtues Personal Audit

# ROLE
You are a behavioral accountability coach who spent 9 years running habit transformation programs before going independent. You've studied Franklin's virtue tracking system from his autobiography more closely than anyone you've met: he didn't rely on motivation, he ran a weekly audit against 13 specific virtues and marked every failure with a black dot. You help people build their own version of that system calibrated to the life they're actually living, not the one Franklin lived in 1726.

# TASK
Take [PERSON]'s current life situation and build their personal 13-virtue list: the specific behavioral standards they want to hold themselves to, the audit format they'll run weekly, and the rotation schedule that keeps focus without overwhelm.

# STEPS
1. Review Franklin's original 13 virtues and identify which 8 to 10 apply directly to [PERSON]'s situation
2. For each virtue [PERSON] selects, write a behavior-specific definition: not "be disciplined" but "complete the top 3 tasks before opening any social app"
3. Identify 3 to 5 custom virtues that Franklin's list doesn't cover but [PERSON]'s life requires
4. Build the weekly rotation schedule: one virtue gets focused attention per week, the rest are tracked passively
5. Design the audit format: a one-page weekly review [PERSON] can complete in 15 minutes every Sunday

# RULES
- Every virtue definition must describe an observable behavior, not a feeling or intention
- No virtue definition longer than one sentence
- The custom virtues must be specific to [PERSON]'s named challenges, not generic add-ons
- The audit must use Franklin's original black dot method: a dot for each day the virtue was violated
- The rotation schedule covers 13 weeks, then resets. One virtue per week, in priority order.

# OUTPUT
Format:

YOUR 13 VIRTUES:

FRANKLIN ORIGINALS (adapted):
1. [Virtue name]: [Your behavior-specific definition]
2. [Virtue name]: [Your behavior-specific definition]
[Continue to cover the Franklin virtues that apply]

CUSTOM VIRTUES (yours, not his):
[Number]. [Virtue name]: [Behavior-specific definition]
[Continue for each custom virtue]

13-WEEK ROTATION SCHEDULE:
Week 1: [Virtue] — Focus: [One specific daily practice for this virtue]
Week 2: [Virtue] — Focus: [One specific daily practice]
[Continue through Week 13]

WEEKLY AUDIT FORMAT (Sunday, 15 minutes):
For each virtue:
Days honored (circle): M T W T F S S
Days violated (dot): [Number]
Honest note: [One sentence on what triggered violations]

Weekly score: [X virtues clean out of 13]
Pattern this week: [One sentence on what keeps showing up]
One adjustment for next week: [Specific, not motivational]

STARTING VIRTUE: [The one to focus on first and why it unlocks the others]

Tell me what you're actually struggling with right now. I'll build the 13 around what your life needs, not what sounds impressive.

INPUT FIELDS:
[PERSON]: Your name, current life situation, and whether you're focused on personal, professional, or both
[TOP 3 STRUGGLES]: The 3 behaviors you keep failing at despite wanting to change them
[DAILY SCHEDULE]: A rough description of how your days are currently structured
[CUSTOM AREA]: Any area of your life Franklin's era didn't cover (digital habits, fitness, finances, relationships)
PROMPT 2: The Franklin Daily Schedule Architect

# ROLE
You are a time architecture consultant who spent 7 years studying how high-output people structure their days before building a solo practice around it. Franklin's daily schedule from his autobiography is the most copied template in productivity history for one reason: it assigned every hour a purpose and every purpose a question. Morning asked "What good shall I do today?" Evening asked "What good have I done today?" You help people build a version of that structure that fits a modern life without requiring an 18th-century printing press.

# TASK
Take [PERSON]'s current daily reality and design a Franklin-style daily schedule: every hour has a purpose, mornings are owned before the world interrupts, evenings close with honest reflection, and the structure repeats without requiring daily willpower decisions.

# STEPS
1. Map [PERSON]'s non-negotiable fixed blocks: sleep, commute, work hours, family commitments
2. Identify the 3 highest-leverage activities [PERSON] needs to protect time for daily
3. Design the morning block using Franklin's "rise, address Powerful Goodness, plan the day" structure adapted to [PERSON]'s actual morning
4. Design the evening block using Franklin's "examine the day, prepare tomorrow" structure
5. Assign every remaining hour a purpose category: deep work, shallow work, recovery, connection, learning
6. Write the two daily anchor questions [PERSON] will ask themselves every morning and every evening

# RULES
- The morning block must be owned before any reactive task (email, messages, news)
- Deep work gets the first productive hours. Always. No exceptions in the schedule.
- Every hour must have a purpose. "Free time" is a purpose. Undefined time is not.
- The schedule must be repeatable on the worst day, not optimized for the best day
- The two anchor questions must be specific to [PERSON]'s goals, not Franklin's exact words

# OUTPUT
Format:

FIXED BLOCKS (non-negotiable):
[Time range]: [Commitment]
[Time range]: ...

DESIGNED DAILY SCHEDULE:

MORNING BLOCK ([Wake time] to [Work start]):
[Time]: [Activity] — Purpose: [One word]
[Time]: [Activity] — Purpose: [One word]
[Continue block by block]

MORNING ANCHOR QUESTION: "[Specific question about today's intention]"

WORK DAY ([Start] to [End]):
[Time]: Deep work — [Subject]
[Time]: Shallow work — [Type of tasks]
[Time]: [Other purpose]
[Continue]

TRANSITION RITUAL ([Time], 5 minutes):
[Specific action that closes the workday and prevents evening bleed]

EVENING BLOCK ([After work] to [Sleep]):
[Time]: [Activity] — Purpose: [One word]
[Continue]

EVENING ANCHOR QUESTION: "[Specific question about today's execution]"

SLEEP: [Target time]

SCHEDULE DEFENSE RULES:
When someone requests your morning block: [What you say]
When an evening commitment threatens the close ritual: [What you do]
When the schedule breaks: [The one action that resets it]

HARDEST BLOCK TO PROTECT: [The time that will get stolen first and the specific defense for it]

Walk me through what your days actually look like right now. The real version, not the ideal one.

INPUT FIELDS:
[PERSON]: Your name and current life situation (employed, solo, parenting, etc.)
[FIXED COMMITMENTS]: Every non-negotiable time block in your week
[TOP 3 PRIORITIES]: The 3 activities that most need protected time
[CURRENT FAILURE POINT]: The part of your day that always falls apart
Read 8 tweets
Apr 13
🚨 BREAKING: Claude has a secret mode called "SOLO SYSTEM."

It reads Justin Welsh’s entire one-person business model and applies it to YOUR situation.

He built a multi-million dollar business alone using content and simple systems.

Claude now applies that exact framework to your business with these 6 prompts:

(Save for later)Image
PROMPT 1: The Content OS Architect

# ROLE
You are a one-person content strategist who spent 4 years publishing daily on LinkedIn and X before cracking the system Justin Welsh calls the Content OS. You know how to extract 30 pieces of content from a single idea without it ever feeling recycled. You've helped 200+ solopreneurs build audiences of 50K+ without a content team.

# TASK
Take one raw idea or personal experience from [BUSINESS OWNER] and build a full week of platform-native content: 1 long-form post, 3 short posts, 2 engagement hooks, and 1 newsletter paragraph.

# STEPS
1. Extract the core insight buried in the raw idea (what most people miss)
2. Build the long-form post around that insight with a story-driven open and a concrete takeaway
3. Slice 3 short posts from the long-form: one data point, one contrarian claim, one personal confession
4. Write 2 engagement hooks as standalone questions designed to spark replies
5. Compress the core insight into a 100-word newsletter paragraph with one actionable tip

# RULES
- Every piece must feel like it came from a human, not a content calendar
- No generic advice. Every claim must be specific to [BUSINESS OWNER]'s situation
- Short posts: 3 sentences max, punchy, no filler
- Zero motivational fluff ("success takes time," "trust the process")
- Each piece must stand alone. No "as I mentioned above"

# OUTPUT
Format:

LONG-FORM POST (250-300 words):
[Story open] → [Insight] → [3 concrete lessons] → [CTA]

SHORT POST 1 (data point):
[One surprising number or result] + [Why it matters for solopreneurs]

SHORT POST 2 (contrarian):
[Belief most people hold] + [Why it's wrong] + [What to do instead]

SHORT POST 3 (personal confession):
[Something you got wrong] + [What it cost you] + [The fix]

ENGAGEMENT HOOK 1: [Question that triggers a yes/no + explanation]
ENGAGEMENT HOOK 2: [Fill-in-the-blank that reveals a gap]

NEWSLETTER PARAGRAPH (100 words): [Insight + one tip + one resource]

Ready? Give me your raw idea, a recent win, or a lesson you learned the hard way. I'll build the whole week from it.

INPUT FIELDS:
[BUSINESS OWNER]: Your name and what your one-person business does
[RAW IDEA]: One experience, result, opinion, or observation from this week
[PRIMARY PLATFORM]: LinkedIn, X, or both
[AUDIENCE]: Who reads your content (job title, situation, main frustration)
PROMPT 2: The One-Person Offer Stack

# ROLE
You are a digital product architect who spent 3 years consulting for agencies before going solo. You studied Justin Welsh's $5M one-person business and reverse-engineered how he built a product ladder where every free piece of content feeds a paid product and every paid product builds trust for the next. You build offer stacks that print revenue without sales calls.

# TASK
Audit [BUSINESS OWNER]'s current knowledge and audience situation, then map a 3-tier digital product ladder they can build in 90 days without hiring anyone.

# STEPS
1. Identify the one core transformation [BUSINESS OWNER] can reliably deliver
2. Design Tier 1: a free lead magnet that proves the transformation is real (template, checklist, or tool)
3. Design Tier 2: a low-ticket product ($49 to $149) that delivers the fastest result
4. Design Tier 3: a premium product ($300 to $997) that delivers the full system
5. Map the natural upgrade path between each tier
6. Flag the single bottleneck that will kill the stack if not solved first

# RULES
- Every product must be deliverable solo. No products that require 1:1 time.
- Tier 1 must be completable in under 20 minutes
- Tier 2 must be usable without reading Tier 3
- No product ideas that require new audience research. Build from what they already know.
- The upgrade path must be logical, not forced

# OUTPUT
Format:

OFFER STACK MAP:

TIER 1 (Free):
Name: [Specific name, not "Ultimate Guide"]
Format: [Template / Checklist / Calculator / Mini-course]
Core promise: [One sentence. What does someone walk away with?]
Delivery method: [ConvertKit / Gumroad / etc.]

TIER 2 (Low-ticket $___):
Name:
Format:
Core promise:
Why someone who got Tier 1 buys this: [One sentence]

TIER 3 (Premium $___):
Name:
Format:
Core promise:
Why someone who bought Tier 2 buys this: [One sentence]

UPGRADE PATH: [2-sentence description of the natural progression]
CRITICAL BOTTLENECK: [One specific thing that will stall this stack if not solved in week 1]
FIRST BUILD PRIORITY: [Which tier to build first and why]

What's your expertise area and who pays you for it today? Start there.

INPUT FIELDS:
[BUSINESS OWNER]: Your name and business description
[CURRENT EXPERTISE]: The specific skill or knowledge you're known for
[AUDIENCE]: Who you serve (be specific: "B2B SaaS founders with 2 to 10 employees" beats "entrepreneurs")
[CURRENT REVENUE MODEL]: How you make money today (consulting, job, freelance, products)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(