HGM Profile picture
Feb 10 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
In 1989, the entire financial world agreed: Japanese inflation was inevitable.
They were spectacularly wrong for 35 years.
Now the US is making the EXACT same mistake, and I can prove it with 3 charts. 🧵
Japan 1989:
✅ Massive money printing
✅ Sky-high asset prices
✅ "Inflation is coming" consensus
US 2025:
✅ Massive money printing
✅ Sky-high asset prices
✅ "Inflation is coming" consensus
Spot the difference? There isn't one.
"But Japan is different—they have unique cultural factors!"
No. They have DEBT.
Japanese corporations and households were so overleveraged that no amount of BOJ stimulus could make them spend instead of deleverage.
Sound familiar?
Here's what happened in Japan:
35 years of deflation
Zero interest rates
Gold fell 45%
Bonds crushed every other asset class
The variable that mattered? Debt-to-GDP ratio.
Guess who just matched Japan's 1989 levels? 🇺🇸
Full analysis + 3 bold predictions in my newsletter: []open.substack.com/pub/hacheimsch…
The mechanism is simple:
High debt + rising rates = exploding debt service costs
Consumers cut spending → businesses cut prices → deflation spiral
We're already seeing this:
Credit card delinquencies rising
Auto loan defaults at 2010 levels
Excess savings: GONE
"But the US has immigration and innovation!"
Japan thought the same thing.
Immigration is politically toxic everywhere.
AI is DEFLATIONARY (it replaces workers and cuts costs).
These aren't inflation catalysts—they're accelerants for deflation.
The cruel irony:
Everyone's buying inflation hedges (gold, Bitcoin, TIPS) because they learned from the 1970s.
But we're not in the 1970s. We're in 1930s America or 1990s Japan.
They're fighting the last war with the wrong weapons.
What to watch:
Core PCE falling below 2% (we're at 2.6% and dropping)
Long-term yields breaking below 4%
Fed making emergency cuts despite "sticky inflation"
When you see these, the Japan playbook is live.
My boldest call: Core PCE inflation averages below 1.5% for all of 2027.
We're not going back to high inflation. We're going to Japan.
Am I wrong? Tell me why debt dynamics are different this time.
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with HGM

HGM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HacGlobalMedia

Feb 6
I'm going to make a falsifiable prediction that will either make me look brilliant or destroy my credibility:
The traditional 60/40 portfolio will experience a 25%+ drawdown before the end of 2027.
Here's my exact reasoning: 🧵
First, what counts as "traditional 60/40"?
60% U.S. stocks (S&P 500 or similar)
40% U.S. investment-grade bonds (10yr+ duration)
Rebalanced quarterly
This is the benchmark for $18 trillion in assets.
The setup is already in place:
Current environment:
S&P at ~6,000 (elevated valuations)
10-year yields at 4.5%
Stock-bond correlation at +0.33
Inflation running 3%+ (above target)
Fiscal deficits $1T+ annually
We're one catalyst away from crisis.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 5
First, what counts as "traditional 60/40"?
60% U.S. stocks (S&P 500 or similar)
40% U.S. investment-grade bonds (10yr+ duration)
Rebalanced quarterly
This is the benchmark for $18 trillion in assets.
The setup is already in place:
Current environment:
S&P at ~6,000 (elevated valuations)
10-year yields at 4.5%
Stock-bond correlation at +0.33
Inflation running 3%+ (above target)
Fiscal deficits $1T+ annually
We're one catalyst away from crisis.
Catalyst scenario 1: The fiscal crisis
Treasury yields spike above 6% as buyers strike.
Stocks fall 20%+ (valuation compression + growth fears)
Bonds fall 15%+ (yield spike = price collapse)
Total portfolio drawdown: 28%
Probability: 35%
Read 10 tweets
Feb 2
The U.S. government needs to sell $2 trillion in bonds this year.
But here's the problem: the three biggest buyers (Fed, China, Japan) are all SELLING.
This creates a doom loop that will destroy portfolio diversification.
Let me explain: 🧵
Quick history: Who traditionally buys U.S. Treasuries?
Federal Reserve (money printing)
Foreign central banks (China, Japan)
Domestic buyers (banks, pensions, you)
This trio absorbed all government debt for decades.
Then 2022 happened.
The Fed reversed: Went from BUYING $120B/month to SELLING.
They've reduced holdings by $1.7 trillion since 2022.
That's a $2+ trillion annual swing in demand.
Someone else has to fill that gap.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 1
In 2022, I watched $18 trillion in "safe, diversified" portfolios lose 16% in a single year.
The math that promised this couldn't happen?
It was taught in every finance class for 70 years.
And it just stopped working.
Here's what broke: 🧵
Modern Portfolio Theory (1952) proved mathematically that 60% stocks + 40% bonds = optimal diversification.
When stocks fall, bonds rise. Perfect balance.
It worked flawlessly through 2008, 2000, 1987.
Until it didn't.
2022: S&P 500 down 18%
Also 2022: Bonds down 13%
Both crashed together.
Financial advisors called it "a once-in-a-century anomaly."
But I pulled 100 years of data.
This isn't an anomaly. It's a reversion.
Read 11 tweets
Jan 31
I'm making 3 falsifiable predictions about private equity's collapse.
These can be proven right or wrong.
If I'm wrong in 2027, roast me mercilessly.
If I'm right, remember who told you.
Let's go 🧵
PREDICTION #1:
By December 2027, at least 3 PE firms currently in the top 20 by AUM will have STOPPED raising new flagship buyout funds.
Confidence: 75%
They'll pivot to credit or evergreen funds rather than admit their flagship product is obsolete.
Why this will happen:
Poor 2020-2021 vintage performance (invested at peak multiples)
LP allocation reductions (denominator effect normalizing)
Competition from credit/infrastructure
= Impossible fundraising environment for median managers
Read 11 tweets
Jan 30
If you're a pension fund, endowment, or family office with 25%+ in private equity:
You're about to learn an expensive lesson.
But there's still time to fix this.
Here's your playbook for the PE reckoning 🧵
Step 2: Cut bottom-quartile and median managers.
This is a hits-driven business where top-quartile funds capture almost all outperformance.
If you can't consistently access tier-1 managers, you're better off in liquid markets.
The "diversification" argument is debunked.
Step 3: Renegotiate fees or walk away.
2-and-20 made sense when PE delivered 15%+ net returns.
At 6-8% net, it's legalized theft.
Push for:
1-and-10 with higher hurdles
Fees on deployed (not committed) capital
Preferential terms for large commitments
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(