I just moved 30% of my portfolio to CASH.
Not because I'm scared.
Because cash is about to become the highest-performing "asset" of the next 3 years.
This will sound insane until you understand deflation. 🧵
Everyone thinks cash is trash:
"Inflation is eating your purchasing power!"
"Cash is for suckers!"
"You need inflation hedges!"
This narrative works in an inflationary environment.
We're not in one. We're entering deflation.
In deflation, cash is KING:
Your dollars BUY MORE as prices fall
Real purchasing power INCREASES
While everyone else's "hedges" collapse
It's the ultimate contrarian trade.
But here's the real reason to hold cash:
Deflation creates FORCED SELLING.
When asset prices fall and leverage unwinds:
Margin calls hit
Panic selling starts
Generational buying opportunities appear
Cash = dry powder for the fire sale.
Look at what happened in 2008:
Gold peaked in March 2008 at $1,000
By Oct 2008: $700 (-30%)
Stocks? Down 50%+
Cash + Treasuries? Crushed everything.
The people with dry powder bought the next decade's returns at 50% off.
"But money markets only yield 4-5%!"
Exactly. And when deflation hits:
4-5% nominal = 7-8% REAL return (as prices fall)
Show me an inflation hedge that will beat that when gold and Bitcoin are down 40%.
The opportunity cost of cash FEELS high right now.
That's how you know it's right.
When everyone thinks cash is stupid, that's when you want to hold it.
When everyone thinks stocks/crypto only go up, that's when you want cash ready.
My current allocation:
30% cash (money markets at 4.5%)
40% long-duration Treasuries
20% quality large-caps (MSFT, V, JNJ)
10% short commercial real estate
Zero gold. Zero Bitcoin. Zero TIPS.
What % of your portfolio is in cash right now?
If it's under 15%, you're not ready for what's coming.
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 1989, the entire financial world agreed: Japanese inflation was inevitable.
They were spectacularly wrong for 35 years.
Now the US is making the EXACT same mistake, and I can prove it with 3 charts. 🧵
Japan 1989:
✅ Massive money printing
✅ Sky-high asset prices
✅ "Inflation is coming" consensus
US 2025:
✅ Massive money printing
✅ Sky-high asset prices
✅ "Inflation is coming" consensus
Spot the difference? There isn't one.
"But Japan is different—they have unique cultural factors!"
No. They have DEBT.
Japanese corporations and households were so overleveraged that no amount of BOJ stimulus could make them spend instead of deleverage.
Sound familiar?
I'm going to make a falsifiable prediction that will either make me look brilliant or destroy my credibility:
The traditional 60/40 portfolio will experience a 25%+ drawdown before the end of 2027.
Here's my exact reasoning: 🧵
First, what counts as "traditional 60/40"?
60% U.S. stocks (S&P 500 or similar)
40% U.S. investment-grade bonds (10yr+ duration)
Rebalanced quarterly
This is the benchmark for $18 trillion in assets.
The setup is already in place:
Current environment:
S&P at ~6,000 (elevated valuations)
10-year yields at 4.5%
Stock-bond correlation at +0.33
Inflation running 3%+ (above target)
Fiscal deficits $1T+ annually
We're one catalyst away from crisis.
First, what counts as "traditional 60/40"?
60% U.S. stocks (S&P 500 or similar)
40% U.S. investment-grade bonds (10yr+ duration)
Rebalanced quarterly
This is the benchmark for $18 trillion in assets.
The setup is already in place:
Current environment:
S&P at ~6,000 (elevated valuations)
10-year yields at 4.5%
Stock-bond correlation at +0.33
Inflation running 3%+ (above target)
Fiscal deficits $1T+ annually
We're one catalyst away from crisis.
Catalyst scenario 1: The fiscal crisis
Treasury yields spike above 6% as buyers strike.
Stocks fall 20%+ (valuation compression + growth fears)
Bonds fall 15%+ (yield spike = price collapse)
Total portfolio drawdown: 28%
Probability: 35%
The U.S. government needs to sell $2 trillion in bonds this year.
But here's the problem: the three biggest buyers (Fed, China, Japan) are all SELLING.
This creates a doom loop that will destroy portfolio diversification.
Let me explain: 🧵
Quick history: Who traditionally buys U.S. Treasuries?
Federal Reserve (money printing)
Foreign central banks (China, Japan)
Domestic buyers (banks, pensions, you)
This trio absorbed all government debt for decades.
Then 2022 happened.
The Fed reversed: Went from BUYING $120B/month to SELLING.
They've reduced holdings by $1.7 trillion since 2022.
That's a $2+ trillion annual swing in demand.
Someone else has to fill that gap.
In 2022, I watched $18 trillion in "safe, diversified" portfolios lose 16% in a single year.
The math that promised this couldn't happen?
It was taught in every finance class for 70 years.
And it just stopped working.
Here's what broke: 🧵
Modern Portfolio Theory (1952) proved mathematically that 60% stocks + 40% bonds = optimal diversification.
When stocks fall, bonds rise. Perfect balance.
It worked flawlessly through 2008, 2000, 1987.
Until it didn't.
2022: S&P 500 down 18%
Also 2022: Bonds down 13%
Both crashed together.
Financial advisors called it "a once-in-a-century anomaly."
But I pulled 100 years of data.
This isn't an anomaly. It's a reversion.
I'm making 3 falsifiable predictions about private equity's collapse.
These can be proven right or wrong.
If I'm wrong in 2027, roast me mercilessly.
If I'm right, remember who told you.
Let's go 🧵
PREDICTION #1:
By December 2027, at least 3 PE firms currently in the top 20 by AUM will have STOPPED raising new flagship buyout funds.
Confidence: 75%
They'll pivot to credit or evergreen funds rather than admit their flagship product is obsolete.
Why this will happen:
Poor 2020-2021 vintage performance (invested at peak multiples)
LP allocation reductions (denominator effect normalizing)
Competition from credit/infrastructure
= Impossible fundraising environment for median managers