Us naive Americans dont think about currency returns as part of our portfolios as we have the biggest and for decades best place to invest in equities.
Every other global investor cares about currency returns at basic level for their investing
The basic idea for investors or all nationalities should be simple and obvious to all. But we Americans just haven't had to care. Maybe we still don't but at least we should be aware. This 101 will explain what is obvious to all non Americans and then show how it works
The goal of all investors is simple. We want to maximize the risk adjusted return of our investments in the currency we expect to spend in the future.
As Americans we want to maximize our USD returns
If we are Japanese we want to maximize our Yen returns
Etc.
When Americans buy a $SPY we receive the return of SPY and its prepackaged in USD. But SPY is not the only equity market in the world (albeit a great one for decades)
We could also buy an index fund of Japanese stocks like the MSCI Japan Index.
YTD the MSCI Japan index is 12.29%. Meaning if you were a Japanese person buying this in Japan you made 12.29%. As compared to a U.S. person buying SPY has lost 0.02%
But the question then is how can a U.S. person buy Japanese stocks.
Let's just describe this at a basic level ignoring the practical issues for the moment. A US person could take US savings and buy Japanese equities by first converting their USD into Yen just like if they
were taking a trip to Tokyo and wanted to buy something locally when they arrived. The U.S. investor hands the yen to a Japanese stock seller and now owns a Japanese stock. One day when they decide to sell the stock they get yen and then they convert the Yen back to USD
But let's calculate the investment return they got on their investment. They got the yen return of the stock (the 12.29%) shown above but they also bought yen and then sold yen and so were exposed to the change in the exchange rate.
Not only do they get the 12.29% Yen return but while holding Yen assets they get the 2.56% Yen appreciation as well
Let's do the math to buy 1 of the index at the starting price of 2090 with JPY at 156.71 they needed 2090/156.71=13.337 USD
Today the thing they own is 2345 and the Yen is 152.70. If they sold it and converted back to yen they have 2345/152.7=15.357 USD
Their return is 15.357/13.337-1=0.151 or 15.1% in USD vs the 0.02% loss on SPY
Ok let's be practical
You can't buy local shares in Japan. For decades financial institutions have created ways for a U.S. person to do the above trade. ADR's work exactly this way. You give a U.S. trustee your USD they convert it into Yen and buy a share. The market price of the ADR is
arbitraged such that you always get the USD price of the Japanese local equity converted from yen to USD
ETF's like EWJ are simply baskets of Japanese stocks which hold the same currency exposure as all these things.
EWJ gives you the return of the MSCI Japan index and exposure to exchange rates of USDJPY. Notice EWJ has outperformed local MSCI Japan by roughly the change in the USDJPY rate.
The bottom line is please check your ETF's or mutual funds for specifics but unless the fund specifically says they hedge out FX exposure you have currency exposure!
You may think that you bought something with USD so you don't have exposure. That's just naive. Hopefully this helps
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101 part 2.
Role of Repo.
In the prior thread I outline credit creation which can happen without banks and money creation which requires banks.
I also hinted at bank reserves role as being one of grease to the
system and NOT necessary for bank money creation but necessary for interbank deposit shifts. I also didn't discuss base money creation from the Fed and won't be dealing with that in this thread either.
Here I will discuss the specific role of Repo in today's financial system
The big takeaway is it is one of many important and necessary means of credit creation AND it has no role in money creation unless a bank is a party to the transaction.
That will take some weedy mechanics to prove. But before we do that let's talk about the entire economy
Money creation and credit creation in the private sector 101
There has been a lot of focus on the repo market lately. I get it. It's an important part of the capital markets in the credit creation process. But its growth and contraction is part of the credit creation process
The repo market where transactions are between hedge funds and money market investors, and those who desire leverage for whatever purpose is an important market in the credit creation process BUT is not part of the money creation process UNLESS a commercial bank or the Fed is
A party to the transaction. Because this is largely misunderstood by even some plumbing experts it's worth it for me to write out my understanding (maybe im wrong which would be awesome so I can learn). So here I go.
I've been studying various versions of balance sheet expansions over my career. I'd classify them as
Japanese first failed effort
UK's version
U.S. Version 1
U.S. version 2
ECB version
Japanese all in version 2
They are all fairly different in approach. The big takeaway 🧵
The developing Fed version that most are excited about is most akin to the Japanese first failed effort.
Here's a rough summary of each
In 2001-2006 Japan the BOJ initiated QE. In their version they offered significant lending to the Japanese banking system for good collateral
The balance sheet doubled in size at a pace of 35 Tn yen per year. However of that 35tn only 5 was direct asset purchase and most of that was Japanese Tbills. This is very similar to the BTFP program from SVB time and the current SRF. It was also sorta similar to ECB LTRO
Why do repo rates change and what do they have to do with reserves. This is a super technical issue and there are better folks to follow on this topic than me but I'll give it a go.
Firstly what are the two sides of a repo transaction and why do they want to interact.
One side is a guy with a bank deposit he wants to earn interest on. The other is a guy who wants to borrow money overnight and has assets he owns that he is willing to provide as collateral to the loan. We can go down a level on each side but for now let's keep it simple.
Most repo transactions are done with UST as the collateral and most UST collatarel used is TBills but. UST's are also highly common collateral but do to the marked to market risk they offer less borrowing capacity per unit of notional (higher haircut)
Some thoughts on 10 year notes since Powell guided for a restart of the cutting cycle at Jackson Hole. Trying to answer what the bond market is saying
Nominal yields have fallen 33bp
Note yields are driven lower by
1)Falling real GDP expectations
2)Falling Inflation expectations 3) Falling "risk" of owning assets 4) Improving supply/demand balance vs expectations.
In attributing nominal yield changes to these 4 things unfortunately market prices don't
Easily demonstrate these things. For instance 3&4 are only able to be measured via a model which estimates risk premiums or the expected return over holding cash
Even Breakeven inflation and real TIPS yields have risk premium buried in there market yields. However we can try
SPX has a trailing earnings yield of 4% with expected 1 year earnings growth of 11.7%. What's the bull case? For me the bull case is a combination of simply collecting the earnings accrual
and having the multiple expand slightly. In that case a 16% return would occur which is roughly 1 std higher and happens 1 out of 6 timer.
The big driver of equity returns is the accrual of earnings. Over the last 5 years earnings accrual has dominated historic returns
As long as companies continue to grow earnings they will go up over the long term.
Multiples rise and fall and as can be seen in the chart can dominate performance of equities in the short term. Furthermore multiples are impacted by interest rates