I reverse-engineered how top consultants at McKinsey, Goldman Sachs, & JP Morgan use it.
The difference is night and day.
Here are 12 insane Claude Opus 4.6 prompts they don't want you to know (Save for later)
1. Market Sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM) from Scratch
Most founders pay consultants $3K just for a market sizing slide.
Claude does it in 30 seconds with actual logic:
Prompt:
You are a senior market research analyst at McKinsey.
Calculate the TAM, SAM, and SOM for [YOUR PRODUCT/SERVICE] in [TARGET MARKET].
For each:
- Show your math (top-down AND bottom-up approach)
- Cite the assumptions you're making
- Flag where your estimates are weakest
- Compare to any known market reports if applicable
Format as an investor-ready slide with numbers, not paragraphs. If my market is smaller than I think, tell me now.
2. Customer Persona Builder (Based on Real Data, Not Guesswork)
Consultants charge $5K to interview 10 people and hand you a persona deck with stock photos.
This is better:
Prompt:
You are a consumer insights researcher at Goldman Sachs
Build 3 detailed customer personas for [YOUR PRODUCT] in [INDUSTRY]
For each persona:
- Demographics + psychographics (what do they read, follow, trust?)
- Buying trigger: What event makes them Google your solution?
- Decision process: Who else influences their purchase?
- Objections: What's their #1 reason to say no?
- Exact phrases they'd use to describe their problem (for ad copy)
- No generic "35-year-old marketing manager" personas
- Base everything on behavioral patterns, not demographics
- Each persona should suggest a different acquisition channel
3. Competitor Positioning Map
I used to spend 2 weeks manually analyzing competitors.
Now I dump everything into Claude and get a strategy in minutes:
Prompt:
Analyze these competitors in [INDUSTRY]: [LIST 5-7 COMPETITORS]
For each: 1. What's their actual positioning? (not what they say — what customers believe) 2. Pricing model + who they're optimized for 3. Biggest weakness based on public reviews (G2, Reddit, Twitter) 4. What customer segment are they ignoring?
Then: Map all competitors on a 2x2 matrix. You pick the two axes that reveal the biggest gap in the market.
Tell me where the white space is and what positioning would let me win it.
4. Pricing Strategy Reverse-Engineering
Most startups guess their pricing. Consultants charge $10K for pricing research.
Claude will do competitive pricing analysis for free:
Prompt:
You are a pricing strategist who has worked with 50+ SaaS companies.
My product: [DESCRIBE PRODUCT + CURRENT PRICING]
Competitors: [LIST COMPETITORS + THEIR PRICING]
Target customer: [WHO]
Analyze: 1. What pricing model fits my market? (per seat, usage-based, flat rate, freemium — and WHY) 2. What's my optimal price point? Show the reasoning using Van Westendorp or Gabor-Granger logic 3. What's the #1 pricing mistake I'm probably making? 4. Design a 3-tier pricing table with specific feature gates that maximize upgrade rate
Be specific with dollar amounts. No "it depends" answers.
5. Industry Trend Report (Quarterly Intelligence Brief)
McKinsey sells trend reports for $25K.
This prompt generates one that's 80% as good:
Prompt:
You are a senior analyst at a top-tier consulting firm preparing a quarterly intelligence brief
Create a comprehensive market intelligence report for [INDUSTRY] covering:
1. Top 5 trends reshaping the industry right now (with evidence, not vibes) 2. 3 emerging threats most companies aren't tracking yet 3. What the smartest players are doing differently (name names) 4. Where capital is flowing (recent funding rounds, M&A activity, IPO signals) 5. Your "hot take" prediction for the next 12 months
- Executive summary (3 sentences max)
- Each section: insight + evidence + "so what" implication
- End with 3 strategic recommendations for a company entering this space
Write like a partner presenting to a C-suite. No filler.
6. Customer Interview Question Generator
Bad customer interviews confirm what you already believe.
This prompt designs questions that surface real insights:
Prompt:
You are a user research lead who has conducted 500+ customer interviews.
Design a 15-question customer interview guide that: 1. Tests each assumption WITHOUT leading the witness 2. Uncovers jobs-to-be-done (not feature requests) 3. Reveals their current workaround and what they spend on it 4. Includes 3 "trap" questions that expose if they're being polite instead of honest
For each question, tell me: What am I actually learning from the answer?
No "How would you feel about..." questions. Only behavioral questions.
7. Go-To-Market Channel Analysis
Consultants charge $8K for a GTM strategy deck.
This prompt builds one that actually prioritizes channels by ROI:
Prompt:
You are a growth strategist who has launched 30+ products.
My product: [PRODUCT DESCRIPTION]
Target customer: [WHO]
Budget: [MONTHLY MARKETING BUDGET]
Current traction: [WHAT YOU HAVE SO FAR]
Analyze the top 8 acquisition channels for my business: 1. Score each channel (1-10) on: cost efficiency, time to results, scalability 2. Rank by expected CAC (show your math) 3. For the top 3 channels: Give me the exact playbook for the first 30 days 4. Which channel is everyone in my space using that I should AVOID? Why?
No generic "try content marketing" advice. I want specific tactics with estimated costs and timelines.
8. Survey Design That Doesn't Suck
90% of market research surveys ask garbage questions and get garbage data.
This fixes that:
Prompt:
You are a survey methodology expert trained in behavioral science.
Goal: I need to validate [SPECIFIC HYPOTHESIS] about [TARGET MARKET]
Design a 12-question survey that: 1. Screens for my actual target customer in the first 2 questions 2. Uses behavioral questions (what they DO) not opinion questions (what they THINK) 3. Includes 1 conjoint analysis question to test willingness to pay 4. Has 1 trick question to filter out people clicking randomly 5. Takes under 4 minutes to complete
For each question:
- Show the question + answer options
- Explain what insight it gives me
- Flag potential bias in the question
Also: What sample size do I need for statistical significance at 95% confidence?
9. SWOT Analysis That Actually Drives Decisions
Traditional SWOT is a box-filling exercise that changes nothing.
This prompt turns it into a strategy weapon:
Prompt:
You are a corporate strategist at JP Morgan advising on competitive positioning.
Company: [YOUR COMPANY]
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Top 3 competitors: [LIST THEM]
Run a SWOT analysis, but make it useful:
STRENGTHS: What do we do that competitors literally cannot copy in the next 12 months?
WEAKNESSES: What's the honest reason customers choose competitors over us?
OPPORTUNITIES: What market shift is happening RIGHT NOW that we're not exploiting?
THREATS: What could put us out of business in 2 years? (not generic "competition" — specific scenarios)
End with: "If I could only do ONE thing this quarter, it should be ___" and defend it.
10. Market Entry Feasibility Study
Before burning $50K entering a new market, run this:
Prompt:
You are a market entry consultant who has advised Fortune 500 companies on expansion.
We want to enter [NEW MARKET/GEOGRAPHY/SEGMENT].
Our current business: [DESCRIBE]
Our advantages: [WHAT WE BRING]
Our budget: [AVAILABLE INVESTMENT]
Conduct a feasibility analysis: 1. Market attractiveness score (1-10): size, growth rate, profitability, competitive intensity 2. Our right to win: What specifically makes us credible in this market? (be honest if the answer is "nothing") 3. Top 3 barriers to entry and cost to overcome each 4. Required partnerships or capabilities we don't have 5. Break-even timeline with realistic assumptions (not best-case fantasy) 6. Kill criteria: What signals should make us STOP and exit?
If this is a bad idea, say so. I'd rather hear it from you than from my P&L.
11. Brand Positioning Statement Generator
Most positioning statements are interchangeable corporate mush.
This prompt creates one that actually differentiates:
Prompt:
You are a brand strategist who built positioning for 3 billion-dollar brands.
My product: [PRODUCT]
Target customer: [WHO — be specific]
Competitors: [TOP 3]
Our unfair advantage: [WHAT MAKES US DIFFERENT]
Create 3 positioning statement options using this framework:
For [target customer] who [need/pain], [product] is the [category] that [key benefit] unlike [competitors] because [reason to believe].
For each option:
- Rate it on: clarity (1-10), differentiation (1-10), believability (1-10)
- What messaging pitfall does it avoid?
- Write the one-liner version (under 10 words) for homepage hero text
Then: Tell me which one you'd bet money on and why.
No "we're the leading platform for..." — that's not positioning, that's copium.
12. Demand Validation Before Building
The $5K question every consultant charges for: "Is anyone actually willing to pay for this?"
Prompt:
You are a lean startup advisor who has validated 100+ product ideas.
My idea: [DESCRIBE YOUR PRODUCT IDEA]
Target customer: [WHO]
Price point I'm considering: [PRICE]
Run a pre-build demand validation framework:
1. PROBLEM VALIDATION: Is this a real problem? Score the pain level (vitamin vs painkiller vs surgery). What evidence exists that people actively search for solutions?
2. SOLUTION VALIDATION: Why would someone choose this over their current workaround? What's the switching cost?
3. WILLINGNESS TO PAY: At [PRICE], what alternatives am I competing with? Is this a "shut up and take my money" or "let me think about it" purchase?
4. QUICK VALIDATION PLAN: Design a 7-day experiment I can run with $0-$500 to test real demand (not surveys — actual buying signals)
5. KILL CRITERIA: What results from the experiment should make me kill this idea?
Be ruthless. Most ideas should die before code is written. Is mine one of them?
I hope this was helpful to you.
I post AI tools, AI industry news, and AI business related content.
If you're interested in such posts:
1. Follow me at @thisdudelikesai 2. Repost the post to help others
Claude has a secret mode called "Devil's Advocate."
You give it any decision you're about to make and it destroys every assumption holding it together.
Here's how to activate it using 6 prompts (save this)
1. The Core Prompt
Open Claude and paste:
“Act as my Devil’s Advocate.
I’m going to describe a decision I’m about to make.
Your job is not to agree with me.
Your job is to attack the logic, assumptions, incentives, risks, blind spots, second-order effects, and emotional biases behind it.
Be direct. Be specific. Be uncomfortable.”
That’s the switch.
Now give it the decision.
2. The Assumption Breaker
Most bad decisions don’t fail because the idea was bad.
They fail because one hidden assumption was wrong.
Paste:
“List every assumption this decision depends on. Which assumptions are strongest? Which are weakest? Which one, if false, would destroy the entire decision?”
Harvard students have a NotebookLM workflow that replaces 6 hours of revision.
They don’t re-read notes.
They upload lectures, slides, and readings.
NotebookLM builds custom quizzes, predicts likely questions, and explains only weak areas.
It compresses weeks into one session.
Here’s how they do it:
1. The Whole Course Compressor
Most students revise chapter by chapter.
That’s slow.
And it hides how ideas connect.
Paste this first:
“Analyze all uploaded materials and compress this course into the 20% of concepts that drive 80% of exam performance. Show how topics connect and which ideas are foundational.”
This changes everything.
Because once you see the backbone of a course, revision gets cleaner instantly.
2. The Likely Exam Topics Prompt
Not every page matters equally.
Professors signal priorities constantly.
Paste:
“Based on lecture emphasis, repeated themes, assignments, readings, and historical patterns, what topics are most likely to be tested heavily?”
This helps you allocate effort properly.
Most students waste hours on low-probability content.
An ex-Anthropic researcher just leaked the internal prompting framework they use on Claude.
Most people leave 60-70% of its reasoning on the table.
No guessing. No prompt engineering courses. No fluff.
10 copy-paste prompts. Tested internally.
Here's the full framework: 👇
1. Role Anchoring
"You are a [specific expert, e.g. senior M&A attorney] with 15+ years of direct experience in [domain].
Before you answer my question, do the following: 1. State the 3 assumptions you're making about my situation 2. List the 3 biggest risks or blind spots in how I've framed the question 3. Ask me up to 2 clarifying questions if critical information is missing
Only after that, give me your answer.
Here's my question: [YOUR QUESTION]"
Forces Claude to surface what you don't know you don't know.
2. Chain of Verification
"Answer my question below. Then run this verification loop:
1. List every factual claim in your answer 2. For each claim, rate your confidence (high / medium / low) and explain why 3. Identify the 3 claims most likely to be wrong 4. Revise your answer to remove or caveat those claims 5. Give me the final revised answer
Question: [YOUR QUESTION]"
Cuts hallucination on factual tasks dramatically. Works on any model.
Someone just turned Claude Code into a full video production studio.
It's called OpenMontage and it's the world's first open-source, agentic video production system.
11 pipelines. 49 tools. 400+ agent skills and it costs $0.69 to produce a complete cinematic product ad.
Here's what this thing actually does: 🧵
Here's the wildest part:
You don't even need API keys to start.
Out of the box, you get:
→ Free offline text-to-speech via Piper TTS
→ Free stock footage from Pexels + Pixabay
→ Remotion turns still images into animated video with spring physics and transitions
→ FFmpeg handles encoding, audio mixing, and subtitle burn-in
Real videos. Zero cost.
Add one API key (FAL) and it unlocks:
→ FLUX AI image generation
→ Google Veo 3 video generation
→ Kling, MiniMax, Runway Gen-4 video clips
→ Recraft images
The VOID product ad they demoed 4 AI images, TTS narration, royalty-free music, word-level subtitles cost exactly $0.69.
🚨BREAKING: Jensen Huang's NVIDIA engineers just released their internal AI prompting playbook.
No paywalls. No waitlists. No gatekeeping.
Your agents are hallucinating 35% more than they should and this stops it cold.
Here's the exact system they built and the 6 prompts that changed our results overnight:
PROMPT 1: The Refusal Protocol
"Complete this task: [task]
If at any point you are uncertain about a fact, stop and write: UNCERTAIN: [what you don't know]
If you cannot complete any part of the request accurately, write: CANNOT COMPLETE: [specific reason]
Never fill gaps with assumptions. Incomplete and honest beats complete and wrong."
This single addition cut hallucinations in their internal tests by 41%.
PROMPT 2: The Confidence Scorer
"After completing your response, go back and score every factual claim on this scale:
[HIGH] - You would stake your reputation on this
[MEDIUM] - You believe this but recommend verifying
[LOW] - This is your best guess, treat with caution