1. FOUNDATIONS
• Color system:
- Primary palette (6 colors with hex, RGB, HSL, accessibility ratings)
- Semantic colors (success, warning, error, info)
- Dark mode equivalents with contrast ratios
- Color usage rules (what each color means and when to use it)
• Typography:
- Primary font family with 9 weights (Display, Headline, Title, Body, Callout, Subheadline, Footnote, Caption)
- Type scale with exact sizes, line heights, letter spacing for desktop/tablet/mobile
- Font pairing strategy
- Accessibility: Minimum sizes for legibility
• Layout grid:
- 12-column responsive grid (desktop: 1440px, tablet: 768px, mobile: 375px)
- Gutter and margin specifications
- Breakpoint definitions
- Safe areas for notched devices
• Spacing system:
- 8px base unit scale (4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96, 128)
- Usage guidelines for each scale step
2. COMPONENTS (Design 30+ components with variants)
• Navigation: Header, Tab bar, Sidebar, Breadcrumbs
• Input: Buttons (6 variants), Text fields, Dropdowns, Toggles, Checkboxes, Radio buttons, Sliders
• Feedback: Alerts, Toasts, Modals, Progress indicators, Skeleton screens
• Data display: Cards, Tables, Lists, Stats, Charts
• Media: Image containers, Video players, Avatars
For each component:
- Anatomy breakdown (parts and their names)
- All states (default, hover, active, disabled, loading, error)
- Usage guidelines (when to use, when NOT to use)
- Accessibility requirements (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus states)
- Code-ready specifications (padding, margins, border-radius, shadows)
3. BRAND APPLICATIONS
• Business cards (front and back design)
• Letterhead and stationery system
• Email signature template
• Social media profile templates (avatar, cover images for 5 platforms)
• Presentation template (title slide, content slide, data slide, closing slide)
4. BRAND GUIDELINES DOCUMENT
• 20-page brand book structure with all rules documented
• Asset library organization system
Include a strategic rationale for every design decision. Show your work.
PROMPT 3: The UI/UX Pattern Master
You are a Senior UI Designer at Apple, specializing in [iOS/macOS/web] applications.
Design a complete UI for [APP TYPE: e.g., fintech dashboard, social app, e-commerce].
User research insights:
- Primary user: [PERSONA DESCRIPTION]
- Top 3 user goals: [LIST]
- Pain points in current solutions: [LIST]
Design following Apple HIG principles:
1. HIERARCHY & LAYOUT
• Visual hierarchy strategy (what users see first, second, third)
• F-pattern and Z-pattern application
• Content density decisions (breathing room vs. information density)
• Liquid Glass design principles (if applicable)
3. SCREEN DESIGNS (Describe 8 key screens in detail)
For each screen provide:
- Wireframe description (layout structure)
- Component inventory (every element on screen)
- Interaction specifications (what happens on tap, swipe, long-press)
- Empty states and error states
- Loading states and skeleton screens
4. COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS
• Button hierarchy (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Destructive)
• Form patterns (validation, error messaging, success states)
• Card layouts and content prioritization
• Data visualization components (if applicable)
5. ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE
• Dynamic Type support (font scaling to 310%)
• VoiceOver labels and hints for every interactive element
• Color contrast ratios (WCAG AA compliance: 4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI)
• Reduce Motion alternatives
• Focus indicators for keyboard navigation
7. ACCESSIBILITY ANNOTATIONS
• Focus on order indicators
• ARIA labels for components
• Color contrast notes
Format as a technical specification document that a junior designer could follow to build this in Figma perfectly.
PROMPT 6: The Design Critique Partner
You are a Design Director at Apple reviewing work from your team.
Perform a comprehensive design critique of the following:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR UPLOADED DESIGN]
Critique framework (be thorough but constructive):
1. HEURISTIC EVALUATION
Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 heuristics:
□ Visibility of system status
□ Match between system and real world
□ User control and freedom
□ Consistency and standards
□ Error prevention
□ Recognition rather than recall
□ Flexibility and efficiency of use
□ Aesthetic and minimalist design
□ Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
□ Help and documentation
Score each 1-5 and provide specific examples.
2. VISUAL HIERARCHY ANALYSIS
• What's the first thing users see? (Is it correct?)
• What's the call-to-action hierarchy?
• Are visual weights balanced?
• Is there adequate white space?
3. TYPOGRAPHY AUDIT
• Font choices appropriate for brand?
• Type scale creates clear hierarchy?
• Line lengths optimal (45-75 characters)?
• Contrast sufficient for readability?
4. COLOR ANALYSIS
• Palette supports brand personality?
• Sufficient contrast for accessibility (WCAG AA)?
• Color used meaningfully (not just decoratively)?
• Dark mode considerations?
5. USABILITY CONCERNS
• Cognitive load assessment (too much information?)
• Interaction clarity (do users know what's clickable?)
• Mobile touch targets (minimum 44×44pt?)
• Form usability (label placement, validation)
6. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
• Does this serve business goals?
• Does it serve user goals?
• Is the value proposition clear?
• Would this differentiate from competitors?
7. PRIORITIZED RECOMMENDATIONS
• Critical (must fix before launch): [LIST]
• Important (fix in next iteration): [LIST]
• Polish (nice to have): [LIST]
8. REDESIGN DIRECTION
Provide 2 alternative approaches with sketches described in words.
Tone: Constructive, educational, actionable. This is a teaching moment.
PROMPT 7: The Design Trend Synthesizer
You are a Design Researcher at frog design, analyzing trends for Fortune 500 clients.
Research and synthesize current design trends for [INDUSTRY/SECTOR] in 2026.
Deliverables:
1. MACRO TREND ANALYSIS (5 trends)
For each trend:
- Trend name and definition
- Visual characteristics (colors, shapes, typography, imagery)
- Origin (where it started, early adopters)
- Current adoption phase (emerging/growing/mature)
- Examples (3 brands using it well)
- Strategic implications (opportunities and risks)
2. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE MAPPING
• Map 10 competitors on a 2×2 matrix (Innovative ←→ Conservative × Minimal ←→ Rich)
• Identify white space opportunities
• Flag overused patterns to avoid
3. USER EXPECTATION SHIFTS
• How user behaviors have changed (post-AI, post-pandemic, Gen Z influence)
• New mental models to design for
• Friction points users no longer tolerate
4. PLATFORM-SPECIFIC EVOLUTION
• iOS 26/visionOS design language updates
• Material You evolution
• Web design pattern shifts
5. STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS
• Which trends to adopt (and how to adapt them for our brand)
• Which trends to ignore (and why)
• 6-month trend roadmap (what to implement when)
6. MOOD BOARD SPECIFICATIONS
• 20 visual references described in detail (colors, composition, mood)
• Color palette extraction
• Typography recommendations based on trend analysis
Include citations to real brands, products, and design systems. Be specific, not generic.
PROMPT 8: The Accessibility Auditor
You are an Accessibility Specialist at Apple, ensuring designs work for everyone.
Perform a comprehensive accessibility audit of this design:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION OR UPLOADED DESIGN]
Audit against WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards:
1. PERCEIVABLE
□ Text alternatives for images (alt text strategy)
□ Captions/transcripts for multimedia
□ Color not used as sole means of conveying information
□ Color contrast ratios:
- Normal text: 4.5:1 minimum
- Large text: 3:1 minimum
- UI components: 3:1 minimum
□ Resize text up to 200% without loss of content/functionality
□ Images of text avoided (except logos)
2. OPERABLE
□ All functionality available from keyboard
□ No keyboard traps
□ Skip links provided for repetitive content
□ Page titles descriptive and unique
□ Focus order logical and predictable
□ Link purpose clear from context
□ Multiple ways to find pages (search, navigation, sitemap)
□ Headings and labels descriptive
□ Focus visible (minimum 2px outline, 3:1 contrast)
□ Pointer gestures have single-pointer alternatives
□ Motion animation can be disabled (prefers-reduced-motion)
□ No auto-playing audio
□ Touch targets minimum 44×44 CSS pixels
3. UNDERSTANDABLE
□ Language of page identified
□ Language of parts identified
□ Components with same function identified consistently
□ Error identification clear
□ Error suggestions provided
□ Error prevention for legal/financial/data (confirmations/reversible)
□ Contextual help available
4. ROBUST
□ Valid HTML/markup
□ Name, role, value available for all components
□ Status messages announced (ARIA live regions)
5. MOBILE-SPECIFIC
□ Orientation not locked (responsive to rotation)
□ Input modalities supported (touch, mouse, keyboard, voice)
□ Placed where user can reach (thumb zone considerations)
6. COGNITIVE ACCESSIBILITY
□ Reading level appropriate (Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8 or below)
□ Consistent navigation placement
□ Error messages plain language, no jargon
□ Time limits can be extended or eliminated
□ No flashing content (3 flashes per second maximum)
DELIVERABLES:
• Pass/fail checklist for each criterion
• Specific violations with location and severity
• Remediation recommendations with code/design solutions
• Accessibility statement template
• Testing checklist for QA team
Include screen reader navigation flow descriptions.
PROMPT 9: The Design-to-Code Translator
You are a Design Engineer at Vercel, bridging design and development.
Convert this design into production-ready frontend code:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR COMPONENT SPECS]
2. SLIDE-BY-SLIDE SPECIFICATIONS (20-30 slides)
For each slide provide:
- Slide number and title
- Layout type (title, content, data, image, split, quote, transition)
- Visual description (composition, imagery, colors)
- Exact copy (headlines: 6 words max, body: 20 words max)
- Speaker notes (what presenter says, 60-90 seconds of content)
- Animation notes (builds, transitions, timing)
Slide structure:
1. Title slide (impactful, minimal)
2. Agenda (3 sections max)
3. The Problem (emotional hook)
4. Current State (data visualization)
5. The Opportunity (market size, trend)
6. Our Solution (product/demo)
7. How It Works (3-step process)
8. Key Benefits (3 benefits with icons)
9. Proof Points (3 case studies/testimonials)
10. Competitive Landscape (2×2 matrix or comparison)
11. Business Model (revenue streams)
12. Traction (metrics, growth curve)
13. Roadmap (3 phases)
14. Team (3 key members)
15. The Ask (investment/partnership/next steps)
16. Closing (memorable final thought)
3. VISUAL DESIGN SYSTEM
• Color palette (dark background for impact, or light for clarity)
• Typography (1 display font, 1 body font, sizes for each level)
• Imagery style (photography vs. illustration vs. abstract)
• Data visualization style (chart types, colors, labeling)
• Iconography style (line vs. filled, consistent weight)
MiniMax just launched MaxClaw that is 100x cheaper than a Mac Mini.
→ Runs 24/7 on your computer.
→ Takes only 30 seconds to set up.
→ 10,000+ pre-loaded expert agents.
Here's how to set up and build a personal assistant with MaxClaw:
1/ What is MaxClaw?
It's an always-on AI agent that lives in the cloud.
→ Runs 24/7 without your computer
→ Remembers everything (200K+ token memory)
→ Controls browsers, writes code, generates content
→ Works inside Telegram, Slack, Discord, WhatsApp
→ Zero setup, no servers, no Docker, no API keys
Think of it as a digital employee that never sleeps, never forgets, and costs almost nothing.
Powered by MiniMax M2.5, the model beats Claude on coding benchmarks.
BREAKING: Claude can now help you build and launch a SaaS product without a technical co-founder.
7 prompts to go from idea to paying users in 30 days:
(Save this before it goes viral)
1. SaaS Idea Validator
"Act like a Y Combinator partner. I want to build a SaaS product for [audience] that solves [problem]. Validate this idea. Analyze market size, existing competitors, pricing benchmarks, and tell me honestly if this is worth building."
2. MVP Feature Scoper
"Act like a product manager at a top startup. Define the minimum viable product for my SaaS idea: [describe]. List only the essential features for launch — nothing extra. Include user stories, acceptance criteria, and a priority matrix."
BREAKING: Perplexity Computer can now do the work of an entire strategy team (automatically)
Here are 10 Perplexity prompts that generate competitor briefs, dashboards, product roadmaps, and recurring workflows in minutes:
(Professionals are already bookmarking this)
1. Auto-generate a live competitor brief
Prompt:
"Monitor [COMPANY/INDUSTRY] competitors. Every week, pull updates on website traffic changes, hiring signals from LinkedIn, and pricing changes. Summarize findings in a concise competitor brief with trends, key shifts, and actionable insights. Format as a weekly update with bullet points for each competitor."
2. Turn raw financial exports into a polished board deck
Prompt:
"Take this financial data [UPLOAD FILE or PASTE DATA] and create a polished board presentation. Include charts for revenue, expenses, and margins. Add a narrative explaining trends, anomalies, and forward-looking recommendations. Format for a professional board deck (PowerPoint/Google Slides style)."
BREAKING: Grok can now validate business ideas before you waste $5K and 6 months (for free).
Here are 09 mega prompts that predict profitability in 24 hours using the same frameworks VCs use to screen 1,000+ pitches per year:
(Save for later)
1/ The Market Sizing & TAM Calculator
"You are a venture capital analyst specializing in market sizing methodology per the standard framework used by Sequoia, a16z, and Bessemer Venture Partners.
Conduct a total addressable market analysis for this business idea:
Idea: [DESCRIBE CONCEPT IN ONE SENTENCE]
Target Customer: [B2B/B2C/D2C - SPECIFIC DEMOGRAPHIC]
Geographic Scope: [LOCAL/NATIONAL/GLOBAL - SPECIFY REGIONS]
Price Point: $[AMOUNT] per [UNIT/MONTH/YEAR]
Step 1 — Market Definition & Segmentation:
→ Define the core problem being solved in 10 words or less
→ Identify the specific customer persona with purchasing authority
→ Map the value chain: Who pays, who uses, who influences?
→ Determine if this is a new market (0→1) or existing market (1→n)
Step 2 — Top-Down TAM Calculation:
→ Industry revenue:
[AMOUNT](citesource:IBISWorld,Statista,Gartner)→Sub−segmentrelevanttoidea:[PERCENTAGE]→Adjustedforaddressableportion:
Step 3 — Bottom-Up TAM Validation:
→ Total potential customers: [NUMBER] (cite population/company count source)
→ Annual contract value:
[AMOUNT]→Marketpenetrationceiling:[PERCENTAGE]→CalculatedTAM:
[NUMBER] × [AMOUNT]×[PENETRATION] [RESULT]
Step 4 — SAM & SOM Segmentation:
→ Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM): Realistically reachable in 5 years with current GTM
Geographic constraints: [FACTORS]
Segment constraints: [FACTORS]
SAM calculation: $[AMOUNT]
→ Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM): Realistically capture in first 3 years
Competitive dynamics: [FACTORS]
Resource constraints: [FACTORS]
SOM calculation: $[AMOUNT] or [PERCENTAGE]% of SAM
Step 5 — Market Timing Analysis:
→ Is the market growing >20% YoY? [YES/NO - if NO, red flag]
→ Regulatory tailwinds or headwinds? [LIST]
→ Technology enabling shift? [SPECIFY]
→ Economic sensitivity: Recession-proof or discretionary spend?
Step 6 — Competitive Density Check:
→ Number of direct competitors: [COUNT]
→ Total VC funding in space last 24 months: $[AMOUNT] (PitchBook data)
→ Incumbent response likelihood: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
→ Market fragmentation: Consolidated or winner-take-all?
End with investment committee summary: Is this a VC-backable market ($1B+ TAM growing 20%+)? Or a lifestyle business market ($10M-$100M TAM)? Use a table format: Metric | Calculation | Data Source | VC Threshold | Pass/Fail."
2/ The Competitive Moat & Defensibility Analyzer
"You are a competitive strategy consultant trained on Hamilton Helmer's '7 Powers' framework and Clay Christensen's disruption theory.
Analyze the defensibility of this business idea:
Idea: [DESCRIBE]
Current Competitive Landscape:
Direct competitors: [LIST 3-5 WITH THEIR DIFFERENTIATION]
Indirect alternatives: [HOW CUSTOMERS CURRENTLY SOLVE THIS]
Potential entrants: [BIG TECH/ADJACENT STARTUPS/OTHER]
Step 1 — Moat Identification (7 Powers Framework):
→ Scale Economies: Do unit costs decrease 10%+ with 2x volume? [YES/NO]
→ Network Effects: Does each new user increase value 10%+ for others? [YES/NO]
→ Counter-Positioning: Can you win by NOT doing what incumbents do? [EXPLAIN]
→ Switching Costs: Would customers lose $[AMOUNT]+ in time/money to leave? [YES/NO]
→ Branding: Can you command 20%+ price premium for identical product? [YES/NO]
→ Cornered Resource: Do you have exclusive access to scarce asset? [SPECIFY]
→ Process Power: Is your method 20%+ better but impossible to copy quickly? [YES/NO]
Step 2 — Moat Durability Timeline:
→ How long to build identified moat? [MONTHS/YEARS]
→ Capital required to build moat: $[AMOUNT]
→ Can competitors replicate moat in [TIMEFRAME] if they tried? [YES/NO]
→ What happens to margins when 3+ competitors have similar moats?
Step 4 — Incumbent Response Simulation:
→ If Amazon/Google/Microsoft entered this space, what is your defense?
→ Can they acquire you for less than building? What is your price?
→ Will they price below cost to kill you? Can you survive 12 months of losses?
→ What is your 'secret' that they cannot easily replicate?
Step 5 — Fast Follower Risk:
→ How long to copy MVP? [WEEKS/MONTHS]
→ What is the 'uncopyable' 10% that requires your unique insight?
→ Can you maintain 6+ month lead through iteration speed?
→ What happens when well-funded competitor offers identical product?
Step 6 — Moat Strength Scoring:
→ Moat depth (0-10): [SCORE] - How wide is the competitive advantage?
→ Moat durability (0-10): [SCORE] - How long does it last?
→ Moat detectability (0-10): [SCORE] - Can competitors see it coming?
End with defensibility verdict: 'Wide Moat' (sustainable 5+ years), 'Narrow Moat' (2-5 years), or 'No Moat' (commoditized immediately). Use a table format: Power Type | Your Business | Strength (1-10) | Time to Build | Investment Required."