1. FOUNDATIONS
• Color system:
- Primary palette (6 colors with hex, RGB, HSL, accessibility ratings)
- Semantic colors (success, warning, error, info)
- Dark mode equivalents with contrast ratios
- Color usage rules (what each color means and when to use it)
• Typography:
- Primary font family with 9 weights (Display, Headline, Title, Body, Callout, Subheadline, Footnote, Caption)
- Type scale with exact sizes, line heights, letter spacing for desktop/tablet/mobile
- Font pairing strategy
- Accessibility: Minimum sizes for legibility
• Layout grid:
- 12-column responsive grid (desktop: 1440px, tablet: 768px, mobile: 375px)
- Gutter and margin specifications
- Breakpoint definitions
- Safe areas for notched devices
• Spacing system:
- 8px base unit scale (4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96, 128)
- Usage guidelines for each scale step
2. COMPONENTS (Design 30+ components with variants)
• Navigation: Header, Tab bar, Sidebar, Breadcrumbs
• Input: Buttons (6 variants), Text fields, Dropdowns, Toggles, Checkboxes, Radio buttons, Sliders
• Feedback: Alerts, Toasts, Modals, Progress indicators, Skeleton screens
• Data display: Cards, Tables, Lists, Stats, Charts
• Media: Image containers, Video players, Avatars
For each component:
- Anatomy breakdown (parts and their names)
- All states (default, hover, active, disabled, loading, error)
- Usage guidelines (when to use, when NOT to use)
- Accessibility requirements (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus states)
- Code-ready specifications (padding, margins, border-radius, shadows)
3. BRAND APPLICATIONS
• Business cards (front and back design)
• Letterhead and stationery system
• Email signature template
• Social media profile templates (avatar, cover images for 5 platforms)
• Presentation template (title slide, content slide, data slide, closing slide)
4. BRAND GUIDELINES DOCUMENT
• 20-page brand book structure with all rules documented
• Asset library organization system
Include a strategic rationale for every design decision. Show your work.
PROMPT 3: The UI/UX Pattern Master
You are a Senior UI Designer at Apple, specializing in [iOS/macOS/web] applications.
Design a complete UI for [APP TYPE: e.g., fintech dashboard, social app, e-commerce].
User research insights:
- Primary user: [PERSONA DESCRIPTION]
- Top 3 user goals: [LIST]
- Pain points in current solutions: [LIST]
Design following Apple HIG principles:
1. HIERARCHY & LAYOUT
• Visual hierarchy strategy (what users see first, second, third)
• F-pattern and Z-pattern application
• Content density decisions (breathing room vs. information density)
• Liquid Glass design principles (if applicable)
3. SCREEN DESIGNS (Describe 8 key screens in detail)
For each screen provide:
- Wireframe description (layout structure)
- Component inventory (every element on screen)
- Interaction specifications (what happens on tap, swipe, long-press)
- Empty states and error states
- Loading states and skeleton screens
4. COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS
• Button hierarchy (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, Destructive)
• Form patterns (validation, error messaging, success states)
• Card layouts and content prioritization
• Data visualization components (if applicable)
5. ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE
• Dynamic Type support (font scaling to 310%)
• VoiceOver labels and hints for every interactive element
• Color contrast ratios (WCAG AA compliance: 4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for UI)
• Reduce Motion alternatives
• Focus indicators for keyboard navigation
7. ACCESSIBILITY ANNOTATIONS
• Focus on order indicators
• ARIA labels for components
• Color contrast notes
Format as a technical specification document that a junior designer could follow to build this in Figma perfectly.
PROMPT 6: The Design Critique Partner
You are a Design Director at Apple reviewing work from your team.
Perform a comprehensive design critique of the following:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR UPLOADED DESIGN]
Critique framework (be thorough but constructive):
1. HEURISTIC EVALUATION
Evaluate against Nielsen's 10 heuristics:
□ Visibility of system status
□ Match between system and real world
□ User control and freedom
□ Consistency and standards
□ Error prevention
□ Recognition rather than recall
□ Flexibility and efficiency of use
□ Aesthetic and minimalist design
□ Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
□ Help and documentation
Score each 1-5 and provide specific examples.
2. VISUAL HIERARCHY ANALYSIS
• What's the first thing users see? (Is it correct?)
• What's the call-to-action hierarchy?
• Are visual weights balanced?
• Is there adequate white space?
3. TYPOGRAPHY AUDIT
• Font choices appropriate for brand?
• Type scale creates clear hierarchy?
• Line lengths optimal (45-75 characters)?
• Contrast sufficient for readability?
4. COLOR ANALYSIS
• Palette supports brand personality?
• Sufficient contrast for accessibility (WCAG AA)?
• Color used meaningfully (not just decoratively)?
• Dark mode considerations?
5. USABILITY CONCERNS
• Cognitive load assessment (too much information?)
• Interaction clarity (do users know what's clickable?)
• Mobile touch targets (minimum 44×44pt?)
• Form usability (label placement, validation)
6. STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
• Does this serve business goals?
• Does it serve user goals?
• Is the value proposition clear?
• Would this differentiate from competitors?
7. PRIORITIZED RECOMMENDATIONS
• Critical (must fix before launch): [LIST]
• Important (fix in next iteration): [LIST]
• Polish (nice to have): [LIST]
8. REDESIGN DIRECTION
Provide 2 alternative approaches with sketches described in words.
Tone: Constructive, educational, actionable. This is a teaching moment.
PROMPT 7: The Design Trend Synthesizer
You are a Design Researcher at frog design, analyzing trends for Fortune 500 clients.
Research and synthesize current design trends for [INDUSTRY/SECTOR] in 2026.
Deliverables:
1. MACRO TREND ANALYSIS (5 trends)
For each trend:
- Trend name and definition
- Visual characteristics (colors, shapes, typography, imagery)
- Origin (where it started, early adopters)
- Current adoption phase (emerging/growing/mature)
- Examples (3 brands using it well)
- Strategic implications (opportunities and risks)
2. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE MAPPING
• Map 10 competitors on a 2×2 matrix (Innovative ←→ Conservative × Minimal ←→ Rich)
• Identify white space opportunities
• Flag overused patterns to avoid
3. USER EXPECTATION SHIFTS
• How user behaviors have changed (post-AI, post-pandemic, Gen Z influence)
• New mental models to design for
• Friction points users no longer tolerate
4. PLATFORM-SPECIFIC EVOLUTION
• iOS 26/visionOS design language updates
• Material You evolution
• Web design pattern shifts
5. STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS
• Which trends to adopt (and how to adapt them for our brand)
• Which trends to ignore (and why)
• 6-month trend roadmap (what to implement when)
6. MOOD BOARD SPECIFICATIONS
• 20 visual references described in detail (colors, composition, mood)
• Color palette extraction
• Typography recommendations based on trend analysis
Include citations to real brands, products, and design systems. Be specific, not generic.
PROMPT 8: The Accessibility Auditor
You are an Accessibility Specialist at Apple, ensuring designs work for everyone.
Perform a comprehensive accessibility audit of this design:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION OR UPLOADED DESIGN]
Audit against WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards:
1. PERCEIVABLE
□ Text alternatives for images (alt text strategy)
□ Captions/transcripts for multimedia
□ Color not used as sole means of conveying information
□ Color contrast ratios:
- Normal text: 4.5:1 minimum
- Large text: 3:1 minimum
- UI components: 3:1 minimum
□ Resize text up to 200% without loss of content/functionality
□ Images of text avoided (except logos)
2. OPERABLE
□ All functionality available from keyboard
□ No keyboard traps
□ Skip links provided for repetitive content
□ Page titles descriptive and unique
□ Focus order logical and predictable
□ Link purpose clear from context
□ Multiple ways to find pages (search, navigation, sitemap)
□ Headings and labels descriptive
□ Focus visible (minimum 2px outline, 3:1 contrast)
□ Pointer gestures have single-pointer alternatives
□ Motion animation can be disabled (prefers-reduced-motion)
□ No auto-playing audio
□ Touch targets minimum 44×44 CSS pixels
3. UNDERSTANDABLE
□ Language of page identified
□ Language of parts identified
□ Components with same function identified consistently
□ Error identification clear
□ Error suggestions provided
□ Error prevention for legal/financial/data (confirmations/reversible)
□ Contextual help available
4. ROBUST
□ Valid HTML/markup
□ Name, role, value available for all components
□ Status messages announced (ARIA live regions)
5. MOBILE-SPECIFIC
□ Orientation not locked (responsive to rotation)
□ Input modalities supported (touch, mouse, keyboard, voice)
□ Placed where user can reach (thumb zone considerations)
6. COGNITIVE ACCESSIBILITY
□ Reading level appropriate (Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8 or below)
□ Consistent navigation placement
□ Error messages plain language, no jargon
□ Time limits can be extended or eliminated
□ No flashing content (3 flashes per second maximum)
DELIVERABLES:
• Pass/fail checklist for each criterion
• Specific violations with location and severity
• Remediation recommendations with code/design solutions
• Accessibility statement template
• Testing checklist for QA team
Include screen reader navigation flow descriptions.
PROMPT 9: The Design-to-Code Translator
You are a Design Engineer at Vercel, bridging design and development.
Convert this design into production-ready frontend code:
[DESIGN DESCRIPTION, WIREFRAME, OR COMPONENT SPECS]
2. SLIDE-BY-SLIDE SPECIFICATIONS (20-30 slides)
For each slide provide:
- Slide number and title
- Layout type (title, content, data, image, split, quote, transition)
- Visual description (composition, imagery, colors)
- Exact copy (headlines: 6 words max, body: 20 words max)
- Speaker notes (what presenter says, 60-90 seconds of content)
- Animation notes (builds, transitions, timing)
Slide structure:
1. Title slide (impactful, minimal)
2. Agenda (3 sections max)
3. The Problem (emotional hook)
4. Current State (data visualization)
5. The Opportunity (market size, trend)
6. Our Solution (product/demo)
7. How It Works (3-step process)
8. Key Benefits (3 benefits with icons)
9. Proof Points (3 case studies/testimonials)
10. Competitive Landscape (2×2 matrix or comparison)
11. Business Model (revenue streams)
12. Traction (metrics, growth curve)
13. Roadmap (3 phases)
14. Team (3 key members)
15. The Ask (investment/partnership/next steps)
16. Closing (memorable final thought)
3. VISUAL DESIGN SYSTEM
• Color palette (dark background for impact, or light for clarity)
• Typography (1 display font, 1 body font, sizes for each level)
• Imagery style (photography vs. illustration vs. abstract)
• Data visualization style (chart types, colors, labeling)
• Iconography style (line vs. filled, consistent weight)
BREAKING: AI can now analyze startups like Sequoia Partners (for free).
Here are 9 insane Claude Opus 4.6 prompts that spot unicorns before VCs do:
(Save this before your competitors do)
I analyzed 50 pitch decks using these 9 prompts.
Predicted 3 of 4 startups that raised Series A within 6 months
Calculated the true TAM that the founders had wrong by 10x
Identified 1 hidden gem pre-seed that just hit $10M ARR
Here are the 9 prompts that actually work:
PROMPT 1: The Pitch Deck Destroyer
You are a Partner at Sequoia Capital reviewing a Series A pitch deck.
BREAKING: AI can now sell prompts like $100K/year prompt engineers (for free).
Here are 9 insane Claude Opus 4.6 prompts that generated $12K in prompt sales:
(Save this before your competitors do)
I started selling AI prompts 90 days ago using Claude.
Top sellers make $10K-$50K/month selling digital instructions.
Claude Opus 4.6 creates the prompts. Gumroad handles delivery. Twitter drives traffic.
Here are the 9 prompts that actually work:
PROMPT 1: The Market Research Miner
You are a Prompt Economy Analyst.
Identify high-demand prompt niches:
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
1. PROBLEM DISCOVERY (Where are people struggling?)
- Twitter search: "ChatGPT not working", "AI prompt help"
- Reddit: r/ChatGPT, r/artificial, r/promptengineering
- YouTube comments: On AI tutorial videos
- Facebook groups: AI entrepreneur communities
- Discord: Midjourney, Claude, GPT servers
2. KEYWORD VOLUME (What are people searching for?)
- Google Trends: "AI prompts for X"
- AnswerThePublic: Question-based queries
- TubeBuddy: YouTube search volume
- Etsy/Gumroad: Existing prompt sales data
3. COMPETITION ANALYSIS (Who's already selling?)
- Gumroad search: Top prompt sellers
- Etsy: AI prompt listings
- PromptBase: Marketplace data
- Analysis: What's missing? What can you improve?
4. PROFITABILITY SCORING (Which niches pay?)
- Score 1-10 on:
* Search volume (are people looking?)
* Competition level (can you rank?)
* Price tolerance (will they pay $10-$50?)
* Repeat potential (do they need more?)
* Result value (does it make/save them money?)
Higgsfield features to use:
- Sora 2 Trends: For trend-driven viral clips [^99^]
- Cinema Studio: For professional camera movements
- Lipsync: For talking head content
Generate 9 video concepts (3 trends × 3 adaptations).