Serhii Antonov Profile picture
Feb 20 8 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🧵Thread: Debunking Russian propaganda claiming that "Maidan" forced Russia to annex Crimea. In reality, preparations for this aggression had been underway long before the Revolution of Dignity.

1/8 Today marks 12 years since Russia began its military aggression against Ukraine and launched the active phase of the annexation of Crimea. This date is recognized not only by Ukraine - but by Russia itself.
The Russian Ministry of Defence medal "For the Return of Crimea" is officially dated 20 February 2014 - 18 March 2014.

On that very day Viktor Yanukovych was still President. He gave the order to crush the protests "by any means necessary". February 20 became the bloodiest day of the Revolution of Dignity.

Obviously, an operation to seize part of a sovereign country cannot be prepared in a day or even a week. The active phase began in the summer of 2013, while the strategic planning had been in motion for many years.

Let’s walk through the facts that prove this 👇Image
Image
2/8
Let’s start with 2008 - the year Russia waged war against Georgia.

Although the signs of Moscow’s desire to annex Crimea had been visible long before: the Tuzla Island conflict, funding of pro-Russian organizations (including the so-called "Crimean Cossacks"), aggressive promotion of Russian citizenship, and the fast-track issuance of Russian passports.

It appears that the weak and toothless reaction of world leaders to Russia’s aggression against Georgia and the occupation of Georgian territories gave Putin the green light for something far more ambitious - a future war against Ukraine.

Immediately after the Georgian war in 2008, Russia began reorganizing the 810th Separate Naval Infantry Regiment into a full brigade, dramatically increasing its manpower. This exact unit would play the central role in the 2014 annexation of Crimea.

From 2008 onward, this brigade conducted regular exercises that specifically practiced the creation and arming of illegal armed formations - "Cossack organizations", "people’s self-defense squads", and so on.
Russian servicemen were put in civilian clothes, issued weapons, and trained to act as supposed "local self-defense forces". In a stunning "coincidence", they were rehearsing exactly what would happen in 2014.

From that same period, close cooperation intensified between the 810th Brigade, the Black Sea Fleet as a whole, and the Crimean Cossacks - groups directly controlled by Russian intelligence and financed by the Kremlin.
All of this was already documented in November 2008(!) in the report "Crimea after the Georgian Crisis" by the Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI), as well as in reports from Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR).Image
Image
Image
3/8
Here’s a very telling detail:
In 2014, the so-called "People’s Self-Defense of Sevastopol" was headed by a Russian citizen, Oleg Roslyakov - the man who had earlier commanded the very same 810th Separate Naval Infantry Regiment we mentioned in the previous post.

These "People’s Self-Defense" units were, in reality, illegal armed formations. They blocked Ukrainian military units, seized military bases, and attacked pro-Ukrainian activists and Crimean Tatars. Yet Moscow presented them as "spontaneous unions of local Crimeans".

Exactly the same "people’s self-defense" groups were created in Donbas - and were also directly run by the Kremlin.
The mask was off.Image
4/8
Russia actively encouraged Black Sea Fleet servicemen and their families to stay in Sevastopol and Crimea after completing their service.

The Kremlin financed large-scale housing construction for both active-duty and retired personnel, while the Russian army offered preferential housing loans and generous subsidies.

This deliberate policy created a huge community of former Russian soldiers living in Crimea. Many easily obtained Ukrainian citizenship simply because they lived on Ukrainian territory.

The same pattern had existed since the collapse of the USSR, when tens of thousands of Soviet (mostly ethnic Russian) military families remained on the peninsula.

In reality, this was a long-term strategy of demographic engineering and creeping hybrid occupation.

The wives of these servicemen - who also received Ukrainian passports - regularly attended Kremlin-backed rallies: against NATO, for greater Crimean autonomy, and other pro-Moscow causes.
Predictably, in 2014 these former Russian military personnel and their networks formed the backbone of the illegal "People’s Self-Defense" units. They helped seize the peninsula and physically attacked pro-Ukrainian citizens and Crimean Tatars.

(Screenshots: quotes from Ukrainian and Russian media several years BEFORE the annexation)Image
Image
5/8
In 2013 - long before the Revolution of Dignity even started - Russia entered the real active preparation phase for the annexation and possible military action.

From July 2013, there was a sharp spike in Russian reconnaissance flights along the Russo-Ukrainian border and over the Black Sea. There were even airspace violations.
In September 2013, Russia and Belarus held joint military drills (exactly the same pattern they repeated in 2022 right before the full-scale invasion).
The scenario of these exercises was chillingly precise:
-Political crisis in a neighboring country
-Creation of illegal armed groups
-Deployment of Russian troops to "restore order"
They were literally rehearsing the future annexation of Crimea.

After the drills, a significant part of the Russian forces did not return to their permanent bases. They stayed right on Ukraine’s borders.
These exact troops were later used to occupy Crimea and fuel the war in Donbas.
The plan was already in motion.
6/8
In 2013, under the convenient pretext of "ensuring security for the Olympics", Russia carried out a major redeployment of troops to Krasnodar Krai - the region located right next to Crimea.
It was exactly from there that these units began entering Crimea starting on February 20, 2014.
Moscow perfectly used the Sochi Winter Olympics as a smokescreen to hide its military build-up for the aggression.
Russia has repeatedly launched its wars during or immediately after the Olympic Games:
2008 - Georgia (right after Beijing)
2014 - Crimea (during and right after Sochi)
2022 - full-scale invasion of Ukraine (right after Beijing again)
The Olympics have become Putin’s favourite cover for military adventures.
7/8
In November 2013 - while the first protests were just beginning in Kyiv and no one yet imagined they would become a full-scale Revolution — Russia moved into the final active preparation phase.

The so-called "People’s Self-Defense" units were being rapidly formed. As we already covered, these groups were filled with former Russian military personnel and agents of Russian special services.

A striking detail: in November 2013, Russia delivered 45 tankers of aviation fuel to a Crimean airbase — instead of the usual 12. This was jet fuel for Il-76 transport aircraft, used for rapid airborne insertion of special forces.

On January 30, 2014, Igor Girkin (Strelkov) — the man who would later ignite the war in Donbas — arrived in Crimea together with several influential Russian figures: oligarchs, State Duma deputies, and individuals directly linked to the FSB and Russian intelligence.

Their mission: prepare the military scenario, coordinate pro-Russian forces, and negotiate the defection of local officials to the Russian side.
Later, one of Putin’s closest aides, Vladislav Surkov, also secretly visited Crimea.

From January 20, 2014, Ukrainian intelligence recorded a sharp increase in "Russian tourists". These "tourists" immediately joined the "self-defense" units, pro-Russian rallies, blocked Ukrainian military bases, and attacked pro-Ukrainian activists.
A month later, Russia would use the exact same "tourist" tactic to destabilize Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkiv, and Odesa.

Meanwhile, the 810th Brigade intensified combat training: urban warfare, seizing infrastructure, and blocking Ukrainian units. On February 18, the brigade (and units in Novorossiysk) was placed on high combat alert.Image
8/8
I’ve presented only a portion of the facts proving that Russia’s annexation of Crimea was meticulously prepared long before the Revolution of Dignity. Otherwise this thread would have been far too long for X.

Interesting fact: the Ukrainian people’s demand for immediate new elections - against the advice of several European leaders - very likely saved Ukraine from a much worse fate.
If Yanukovych had remained in power for just one more year, Russia could have seized far more territory or turned Ukraine into a giant Belarus: de jure "independent", but de facto a Kremlin puppet state.

Russia later tried to replicate many Crimean tactics in Donbas: importing "Russian tourists", placing Russian military officers in charge of "people’s self-defense" units (Girkin being the most notorious example), intimidation, and elimination of pro-Ukrainian locals.
But Crimea was simply a far more convenient bridgehead because of the already stationed Black Sea Fleet.

Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars did try to resist. Yet with Russian forces deeply embedded on the peninsula, these protests were brutally crushed.

Russia didn’t annex Crimea because of Maidan.
Maidan happened, in part, because Russia had already decided to annex Crimea.
The plan was ready. The troops were in position. The clock was ticking.

(Video: clashes in Crimea between pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian rallies, February 2014)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Serhii Antonov

Serhii Antonov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @13serhi

Feb 18
1/6
Today - exactly 12 years ago - the bloody сulmination of the Revolution of Dignity began.
And right in those days, February 18-20, 2014, Russia started its war against Ukraine. The final preparations had been secretly underway for months.
Back then, just like today, skeptics told us Ukrainians could never win. Yanukovych’s repressive machine looked unbeatable.
But in just a few days it collapsed. Yanukovych, his inner circle, and many of his security forces and enforcers fled in panic. Those who stayed behind were later traded for Ukrainian POWs.
2/6
By that point it was already crystal clear: this could not end peacefully.
Protesters had already been killed in January. Hundreds more had been brutally injured in November and December - and no one was ever held accountable.

On top of that, Yanukovych’s coalition rammed! through draconian "dictatorship laws" that crushed the right to protest and freedom of speech.
Just before that, Yanukovych - using his fully corrupt Supreme Court - had already rewritten the Constitution to massively expand presidential power.
It was obvious he had zero intention of stepping down or calling early elections.

On the other side, Ukrainians refused to accept a President with blood on his hands any longer. People weren’t asking for elections in a year or even six months - they demanded them immediately. And a fair trial for those involved in the murder and torture of people
There was no doubt left: the people would not back down.

And a dictator who had already spilled blood… would spill it again.Image
3/6
On February 18, 2014, opposition MPs demanded the immediate repeal of the illegal constitutional changes that had massively expanded presidential power.
Yanukovych’s team blocked the vote.

So the protesters made a decision: they would march from Independence Square straight to the parliament building and hold a picket there.

The police responded with raw aggression — blocking the streets with buses and armored vehicles, beating people with batons, firing stun grenades and pump-action shotguns.
But the people were no longer afraid.

Thousands of Ukrainians fought back against the special forces. A real street battle exploded in the very heart of Kyiv.
The special forces opened live fire — including Kalashnikov assault rifles.
The number of dead began to climb.

The images of unarmed protesters advancing under fire with nothing but ordinary plastic shields… those pictures still speak louder than any words.
They are the ultimate symbol of unbreakable spirit and total sacrifice for the future of their country.

The defenders dug in to hold Independence Square. They set tires on fire around the barricades to create thick smoke screens that would blind snipers and hide them from aimed shots.
It was the hardest day yet. Casualties kept rising, while Yanukovych’s special forces continued their brutal assault.
Read 6 tweets
Dec 30, 2025
My previous thread about languages in Ukraine attracted the attention of Kremlin bots and lovers of Russian propaganda. Usually, I rarely respond to such accounts because it makes no sense — there won't be any constructive dialogue. But here there's so many propaganda clichés that I decided to debunk them, because it really pisses off the "vatniks." After all, I've been dealing with this for over 10 years and know the situation from the inside perfectly.
So let's start with these bizarre maps that propagandists draw. Once again, I see maps of elections for Yanukovych and his party, which supposedly prove something. But that's nonsense. A ton of people who once voted for Yanukovych (just like those who speak Russian) are now fighting in the Ukrainian army and gladly eliminating Russians. As I already told in my older threads — Yanukovych in his pre-election program advocated cooperation with both the EU and Russia. Most Ukrainians (despite the bloody history) had a completely positive attitude toward all neighbors, including Russia, because they left history in the past. But it was precisely the annexation of Crimea and the start of the war in 2014 that made it clear that Russians haven't changed. The full-scale war of 2022 gave birth to hatred toward murderers, torturers, and rapists.
That's why these maps are long in the history books now. And the reality is to have nothing in common with the aggressor. If you want to look at maps — take a look at the 2019 presidential elections.

#Ukraine #RussianPropagandaImage
Image
Image
This map is the funniest one. It has appeared many times in replies from Russian bots and trolls. And it was exactly this one that motivated me to write my previous thread.
Let's start with the fact that the real source of this data is unclear. I searched the website of this university — I didn't find this information. I asked Grok and GPT, and in response, I got that nowhere is it confirmed that such research exists. The methodology of this survey or study is unclear. Therefore, it's likely just an empty fake that brainwashed Kremlin trolls carry around.
The second point about this map is the concept of "surzhyk." Essentially, surzhyk is a dialect of the language that varies depending on the region. This is typical for large countries. And also for countries that have been occupied by different states for a long time. Ukraine falls under both categories, so the Ukrainian language is diverse.
And the funniest thing is that many territories are marked as Russian-speaking, even though in those areas people often use not literary Russian, but a characteristic dialect — "surzhyk." Thanks to this, on the Donbas I could often distinguish visiting Russians from locals. And I almost always guessed right. Because the Russian language among locals in the Donbas differs with a Ukrainian tone and Ukrainian words in the Russian dialect.
Ukrainian-based "surzhyk" varies by territory and can include Russian, Polish, or Hungarian words depending on the region. Therefore, this map is complete nonsense — both due to the lack of a source and understanding of the research methodology, and because of introducing the concept of "surzhyk," since "surzhyk" can be considered anything.
But fans of Russian propaganda don't give a damn about sources and facts.Image
And this map, as I understand it, is only used to have more graphics, as if it proves something. What does it have to do with languages in Ukraine? Nothing. What kind of survey is this and what methodology? None.
It's just an attempt by pro-Russian trolls to prove to me (a person from Donbas) that we all supported Russia. Absolutely no argument.
Just more noise that carries no facts. Instead, I attached my old thread about the Revolution of Dignity and the start of Russia's war against Ukraine in 2014. There's a lot of text and facts there — something fans of Russian propaganda don't like. But those who are really interested in the topic can study this history from me, as an eyewitness to those events.
x.com/i/status/16610…Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
🧵1/5 Russian propaganda often manipulates the fact that the Russian language is widespread in Ukraine, especially in the eastern and southern regions. It claims that Russian-speaking people are Russians, and therefore these regions are ethnically Russian.
In this thread, I'll break down why Russian-speaking Ukrainians appeared and how this situation is changing right now. I'll share my own observations from Donbas before 2014 and how the language landscape has shifted in Ukraine today. I'll also provide historical facts about how the Ukrainian language was suppressed over the past centuries—but still survived. And finally, it will become clear why Russia is, now as always, interested in destroying Ukrainian culture 👇Image
2/5 I grew up in Donbas in a society where Russian was the dominant language. I attended a Russian-language school — and most schools were like that (the reason why will become clear when I get to the historical facts). But despite the language of everyday communication, the majority were Ukrainians who preserved Ukrainian traditions and often mixed Ukrainian words into their speech.
As a child, I heard Ukrainian only from my great-grandmother, from rural villagers who traditionally kept their language and culture alive, and occasionally on television.
When I started university, I encountered Ukrainian much more often — from professors, artists, cultural figures, and conscious individuals. That's when I began occasionally switching to Ukrainian myself. After the Russian occupation of my city in 2014, I fully switched to the language I now consider my native one.
An interesting observation from my student years: I noticed that people who came to study from Ukrainian-speaking areas of Donbas would speak Russian in public. But when their parents called, they would shyly switch to Ukrainian on the phone.
This can be explained by the fact that since the times of the Russian Empire and later the Soviet Union, Kremlin propaganda tried to impose the idea that Ukrainian is an artificial dialect spoken only by uneducated people. This propaganda was so powerful that it lingered even after Ukraine's independence, embedding itself in people's minds and making them ashamed of their origins. The situation only began to change after Russia's aggression in 2014.

So, let's walk through the history of the suppression of the Ukrainian language and understand the Kremlin's motivation to turn Ukrainians into Russians👇
3/5 The first seizures of Ukrainian lands by Muscovy occurred in the 16th and 17th centuries.
Muscovy's doctrine from that time (and relevant to the present day) was to proclaim itself the successor to the ancient state of Rus (whose center was actually on Ukrainian lands). Therefore, in the 18th century, Muscovy renamed itself the Russian Empire.
For assimilation purposes, the Russians introduced the terms 'Great Russians' for themselves and 'Little Russians' for Ukrainians. They called the Ukrainian language the 'Little Russian dialect' of the Russian language.
And to assimilate Ukrainians, they began gradually destroying the Ukrainian language through various bans and propaganda in the following centuries.
To keep this thread from being boring and overloaded with dates, I'll provide just a few examples that illustrate the trend of suppressing the Ukrainian language.
The first decrees against the Ukrainian language appeared at the beginning of the 18th century (right around the time Muscovy became Russia). Peter I banned book printing in Ukrainian, and Ukrainian texts were removed from church books and replaced with Russian ones.
In 1863, the Valuev Circular was issued, which declared the Ukrainian language 'non-existent' and imposed strict bans on any Ukrainian publications. In fact, this was a response to the revival of Ukrainian literature, which had occurred despite anti-Ukrainian orders that had existed for a century and a half prior.
In 1876, the Ems Ukase banned the Ukrainian language in theater, science, and the import of Ukrainian-language publications (since printing Ukrainian books within the country was already prohibited). Public performances in Ukrainian were also banned.
Since Christianity played a leading role at the time, in 1881 church sermons in Ukrainian were prohibited.
This is far from a complete list of bans on the Ukrainian language.
A situation emerged where Ukrainian activists and writers were arrested for underground printing of Ukrainian books or their import from abroad, for writing Ukrainian works, or simply for public speeches in Ukrainian or criticism of anti-Ukrainian decrees.
In contrast, only by communicating in Russian could a Ukrainian build a career.
Even despite this, according to the 1897 population census, Ukrainian speakers in various regions of modern Ukraine ranged from 42 to 93 percent. Some Ukrainian regions were part of territories extending deep into Russia, but villages and towns on the territory of modern Ukraine had more Ukrainian speakers than Russian speakers.
But this laid the foundation for Russian being considered more 'prestigious,' with science and culture being Russified, and most of the population, despite their native language, coming to understand Russian. And that's when Russian-speaking Ukrainians appeared.
And this work was continued by the successor to the Russian Empire — the Soviet Union.Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 19, 2025
Who does Donbas historically really belong to?
As a native of Donbas and someone who knows the history of my homeland well, I couldn't help but laugh at Putin's latest nonsense claiming that Donbas has always been Russian.
🧵1/6
In this thread, I'll share brief historical facts about the region along with my own observations as a local. It might be a lot of text for casual scrolling, but it'll be valuable for anyone who genuinely wants to understand the issue — instead of swallowing empty, manipulative propaganda.
(In the photo: Donetsk, 2014)
#Ukraine #Donbas #RussianPropagandaImage
2/6 I'll start with my own memories.
I was born and spent my childhood in a small mining town in Donbas. Indeed, there were many Russians among the population — or people who identified as Russian. Most had relatives in Russia, and the overwhelming majority spoke Russian.
But here's what's interesting: everyone who had relatives in Russia was a descendant of migrants from Russia, not the other way around. These were people who had moved to Donbas in the 20th century, rather than locals whose families had emigrated to Russia.
As for truly local people — those whose roots stretched back to the 19th century or earlier in this land — there were very few. My great-grandmother was one of them. She had a distinctly Ukrainian surname and spoke Ukrainian.
Even from these personal observations, it's clear that Donbas only became partially Russian in the 20th century. How exactly that happened will be explained through historical facts further in this thread.Image
3/6 The territory of modern Donbas remained largely uninhabited for a long time and was known as the 'Wild Fields' (Dyke Pole). Only wild nomadic tribes appeared here occasionally (except for Greek settlements on the Azov Sea coast). I won't go into long and tedious stories about those nomadic tribes — the Polovtsians, Khazars, and others.

Until the 16th century (after the collapse of the Golden Horde), this area was a buffer zone between the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Crimean Khanate. On European maps of that time, it was depicted as empty steppe, or as 'Great Tartary,' or as part of the Crimean Khanate.

Nearby, Ukrainian Cossackdom was developing (part of Lithuania, and later the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, but functioning like a 'state within a state' with its own elected leaders, laws, and courts). It was the Cossacks who started the real settlement of the 'Wild Fields' — the part we now call Donbas.

The first mention of Cossacks in these territories dates back to 1547 (one of the sources is the Nikon Chronicle). It is possible that Cossacks appeared there even earlier.
From the 17th century onward, this turned into regular, gradual settlement of the wild region by Ukrainians, continuing into the 18th century. This is confirmed in works by historians from various countries: Polish, Ukrainian, Russian, and French.Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 14, 2024
The time has come to debunk one of the myths of Russian propaganda.

I saw this tweet from a Russian asset and it made me laugh. But I realized that many foreigners have no knowledge of Ukrainian history. Therefore, I will try to write briefly about Stepan Bandera, his difference from Andrii Melnyk and the Ukrainian struggle for independence in the middle of the 20th century.

What did I mean when I said that I find it funny to read this piece of Russian propaganda? This is the fact that the Russian asset speaks positively about Melnyk, but most Ukrainians have a cool attitude towards Andriy Melnyk due to the fact that he at a certain period relied on cooperation with the Nazi government with the hope that the Germans would support the restoration of Ukraine's independence. And Stepan Bandera is a symbol of resistance to two bloody dictatorships - Nazism and Communism. This symbolism is clearly illustrated in his biography - Bandera was a prisoner of a German concentration camp, his brothers were killed by the Nazis, and Stepan was killed by communists from the KGB.Image
Image
But we must start with the fact that after the First World War, Ukraine lost its independence after a short time and was occupied by several states, including the Soviet Union and Poland.

Ukrainians became the largest nation without its own state in Europe. This contributed to the fact that insurgents who fought for the independence of their state appeared on Ukrainian territory. These were different organizations, but in this context we will talk about the organization of Ukrainian nationalists.

Ukrainian nationalists differed from nationalists in some other European countries. If nationalism in imperialist countries is about domination over other nations, then Ukrainian nationalism is about restoring one's own state, culture and language of the Ukrainian nation. This is a consequence of the fact that Ukraine was an occupied colony for centuries.

The organization of Ukrainian nationalists existed mainly in the Ukrainian territories that were in Poland. However, the rebels declared the need to restore the Ukrainian state both on the territory of Poland and on the territory of the Soviet Union. Therefore, they represented a threat to both countries.

Stepan Bandera, together with other rebels, was arrested by the Polish authorities for rebel actions and sentenced to death. Then the Poles reduced the punishment and handed down a sentence - life imprisonment. It should be noted that even under the threat of the death penalty, Bandera did not betray his ideas and proclaimed that Ukraine should become independent.

At that time, the organization of Ukrainian nationalists was headed by Yevhen Konovalets. He actively worked on the diplomatic front and tried to raise the issue of Ukrainian sovereignty in the League of Nations. The Soviet Union did not like this. Therefore, a KGB agent killed Yevhen Konovalts in Rotterdam, where he had been living for the last time. Konovaltsy is buried at the Kroswijk cemetery in Rotterdam.
In 1939, Andriy Melnyk was elected the head of Ukrainian nationalists in Rome.
At the same time, World War 2 begins and Bandera, along with other rebels, find themselves at large. The difference between the Poles and the Communists should be noted. The Poles, before the threat of occupation, released prisoners, and the communists shot them.

Stepan Bandera and other rebels who were in Ukrainian territories were skeptical of Andrii Melnyk.

It is known that Bandera and his supporters were able to go to Rome to meet with Melnyk. According to historians, including the American John Armstrong, Bandera suggested to Melnyk to transfer the headquarters of the organization to a neutral country and start rewarding relations with Great Britain, France, the USA and Canada. It was also proposed to create a legion of Ukrainians to help Finland, which was then attacked by the Soviet Union.

Melnyk refused these proposals. He hoped for a war between Germany and the Soviet Union in order to use this moment to try to restore Ukrainian independence in alliance with the Germans.

Since then, the organization of Ukrainian nationalists has split into Bandera (OUN B) and Melnikiv (OUN M).

I would like to note that the difference between these organizations was small - both groups pursued the goal of creating a Ukrainian state. But they had different ways of achieving their goal.

Bandera's supporters did not trust the Nazis and hoped only for their own strength to gain independence.

Melnyk's supporters did not believe in the possibility of a successful struggle simultaneously against two great totalitarian empires - Nazi and Communist. They also did not believe in the idea of ​​"making an alliance with Britain and France." Because these countries were allies of Poland, which owned part of Ukrainian territories.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 1, 2023
Continuation of my memories of the beginning of the war in Donbas in 2014.

At the beginning of April, the Kremlin moved to a new stage of the conflict - taking control of administrative buildings, completely suppressing pro-Ukrainian activists and creating falsified referendums… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
There are many facts about the fact that the Russians intervened in the situation in Ukraine and are involved in the seizure of administrative buildings.

One example is the seizure of the building of the Kharkiv State Administration. Then a pro-Russian rally attacked a rally in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… ImageImage
Another famous Russian, who not only participated in the beginning of the war in Donbas, but was also one of the leaders, is the Russian Igor Strelkov, also known as Girkin. His Russian gang took over Slovyansk and nearby towns, where the first fighting between Russia and Ukraine… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(