1/ It's generally been assumed that the Russian government wants to force its soldiers off Telegram and onto the government-approved MAX app. However, it seems that MAX may also be banned for military use, and an unnamed specialised military messenger may be imposed instead. ⬇️
2/ The generally reliable Fighterbomber Telegram channel reports on a possible ban of both MAX and Telegram in the military (referring to "Laos" as a commonly-utilised euphemism for Russia, to evade the censors):
3/ "Sources within the Security Council suggest that, amid the suppression of Telegram by all available means, Lao troops have received orders banning the use and installation of the world's most secure national messenger on devices with advanced multimedia capabilities,…
4/ …which has been repeatedly banned by previous orders.
Very soon, a unique program will be introduced into Laos' arsenal, and it will be possible to send messages and documents using it.
But this is not certain."
5/ This theory is given credence by a curious video published by the propagandist Vladimir Solovyov, showing "a serviceman with the unmanned systems forces in the Special Military Operation, call sign 'Sprut'," talking about his unnamed unit's communications systems.
6/ The video is clearly intended to be a so-called 'anti-crisis' intervention by the Russian Ministry of Defence in an attempt to calm the many soldiers who have expressed alarm and frustration at the government's crippling of a vital communications system.
7/ 'Sprut' explains that his unit doesn't use Telegram, instead relying on a dedicated, secure military messenger:
"We didn't use Telegram; that messenger has foreign servers, so all our correspondence would have been leaked.
8/ "Our homeland provided us with a Russian-developed messenger, a domestic messenger that basically covers all our needs. This includes voice chats, video conferencing, text messaging, file sharing, and file editing.
9/ "Basically, it covers all our needs, and we don't need any foreign stuff. Unit management is carried out exclusively through it, via additional military communications.
10/ "But for the most part, all command and control, as well as communication between service members, is handled through this messenger. It uses encrypted communication channels, the keys are impossible to crack, and it fully meets all our operational requirements."
11/ Other Russian warbloggers express scepticism. 'UAV Developer' comments that "now we're seeing a series of "we don't use Telegram" statements from a number of servicemen in their new, clean uniforms."
12/ "Notice how intimately this soldier knows who has which servers and encryption keys. These aren't some dumb Ukrainians!
We also have plenty of heavy drones, electronic warfare systems, excellent communications, and everyone has enough of everything...
13/ "Is it any wonder Kupyansk has already been captured seven times, and only the President has been informed of its capture twice?"
14/ 'Combat Reserve' asks:
"I have a question: do other military personnel know that we have a secret military messenger?
Who cares about the messenger, but how do you create the Internet around it?
Using fart-powered magic?"
15/ 'Mine Division' points out the problem with Russian 'military messengers':
"ONCE AGAIN. Specialised, highly secure messengers have been in use for over 10 years (I've used them myself), and rightly so!"
16/ "The problem is that they create problems interacting with those who don't have them.
And this is precisely the key reason why even "long-time users of special messengers" use Telegram."
17/ 'When the cannons start singing' observes sarcastically: "While the old-timers, reading the internet from printed A4 sheets, are finishing off the cart and doing everything they can to roll back the IT industry by two decades (to the days of the Pentium 4) or more,…
18/ …I contacted a friend who's still devising ingenious methods to circumvent restrictions in the Special Military Operation zone where he resides, because thanks to our old-timers, everything went to hell for him and his unit-mates.
19/ "He's very grateful; at least he doesn't get calls from scammers anymore. That's more important." /end
1/ Russians who have never served in the Russian army and have never signed a military contract are nonetheless being rounded up as deserters and sent to their deaths in assault squads. It's the result of an ongoing and still unresolved bureaucratic blunder by Russia's MOD. ⬇️
2/ During the war in Donbas, between 2014 and the full-scale Russian invasion of February 2022, thousands of Russian nationalists volunteered to fight for the militias of the Luhansk and Donetsk 'People's Republics'. Many were subsequently discharged.
3/ In December 2022, Russia formally incorporated the Luhansk and Donetsk militias into the Russian Army as part of the annexation of both 'People's Republics'. All current and former members of the militias were reclassified as soldiers of the Russian army.
1/ What is the war in Ukraine even for?, asks a Russian warblogger and paramilitary leader. After four years, the shifting goals of the Russian government have left many of its citizens confused about what its aims are in Ukraine, making it unclear what victory actually means. ⬇️
2/ Zakhar Prilepin sums up the complaints of many warbloggers about the vagueness of Russia's objectives:
"Yesterday, I received a lot of congratulations, and the phrase "I wish you victory!" was a common one.
I hope people say it ritualistically, not seriously."
3/ "It's not even that Russia can't win yet. The point is that we don't have such a goal. We're not planning to go to Kyiv, and we're not planning to go to Odesa. This means there will be no demilitarisation or denazification.
1/ The results of Russia's war have been "mediocre", says a Russian warblogger who is fighting in Ukraine. The army is beset by "corruption, scheming, and collusion", and by the mass intimidation and coercion of soldiers by commanders. He sees tough challenges still to come. ⬇️
2/ 'Vault No. 8' writes:
"The war was not easy from the outset.
The enemy still retains counterattack capabilities; over time, the enemy has become capable of targeting the economy of pre-war Russia and conducting mass terror and sabotage, including in Moscow."
3/ "However, it was only in the fourth year of the war that we began to properly employ strategic strike weapons, which began to yield maximum success. Only in the fourth year of the war did we bring the drone component up to a modern level.
1/ Russia is "entangled in too many sins" for it to have succeeded in Ukraine over the past four years, argues Russian warblogger Yuri Podolyaka. He sees the war as a "salvation plan" for Russia that went badly wrong and "laid bare" the country's problems. ⬇️
2/ "Four years ago, a special military operation began...
It obviously didn't go according to plan. Or rather, not according to the plan our military and political leadership had originally.
As a result, the country changed irreversibly.
3/ "No matter how much anyone would like to turn everything back. And this, perhaps, is the most important result of these four years. Difficult years. But, apparently, necessary. Since God decided so.
1/ Four years on from the start of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russian warbloggers are reflecting on the changes that the war has wrought in Russia. Some Russian soldiers are wondering what it was all for. ⬇️
2/ Nikita Tretyakov writes:
"Our varied thoughts and questions converge on one thing: what is going on out there, in the rear, while we are here, far from our families, loved ones, and past lives, defending the Motherland as best we can and seemingly honourably as possible?"
3/ "What is going on there in this very Motherland behind our backs?
Why does it feel more and more uncomfortable to walk around our cities in military uniform – now including Donetsk and Luhansk – every year? Is it even inappropriate?
1/ With manpower increasingly in short supply, Russia is reportedly turning instead to womanpower. Women, particularly convicts and migrants – some still only teenagers – are being forced to join the army, in some cases to serve in frontline combat roles. ⬇️
2/ Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty reports that the Russian prison service is putting female convicts under intense pressure, including through starvation, to sign contracts to join the army. Hundreds of women – both Russians and foreigners – are thought to have signed up.
3/ The Uzbek human rights organization Ezgulik reports that it has received letters from the relatives of dozens of Uzbek women who say they are being abused and mistreated to force them to sign military contracts.