We are short $HIFS: we believe it is the $RILY of regional banks because it is over-leveraged, under-reserved, with a significant portion of its loan book underwater and/or in distress. $HIFS foreclosed two loans for $5.2m in January but did not disclose either of these loans as “non-performing” as of earnings ending 12/31/2025. We have found more than >$125m additional high risk, distressed loans in the D.C. area. We believe $HIFS lacks the liquidity, capital cushion, or earnings power to easily absorb the losses we believe are inevitable. We see potential downside of ~60% or more from capital erosion and multiple compression. Let’s take a tour.
1701 Park Road NW, Washington, DC. One of the borrowers who entered foreclosure in January owns $47m worth of real estate backed by $HIFS. The largest loan is this “low-risk” $17m loan which is, in our view, a disaster. The borrower is being sued by multiple other lenders. This vacant and vandalized project has been hit with multiple stop work orders.
2637 16thSt NW, Washington, DC. This same borrower, who had one of his smaller $HIFS properties enter foreclosure in January has another “low-risk” $15m loan for a rehab project that appears completely stalled. In December, it was hit with a lien for unpaid masonry work. Our site visits, three months apart, revealed that the exact same pile of garbage has been sitting in the same spot the entire time...
50 M St NW, Washington, DC. It is 270 days delinquent and failed to sell in March 2025. $HIFS refuses to take any reserves for this $31m loan; however, the borrower has described this project as “infeasible” due to high financing and construction costs.
8008 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD. $HIFS's $15m loan was given in October 2023 but there has been no visible progress on this rehab. Other projects by this same borrower also appear to have stalled, according to our research. How is this project “low risk?”
Almost half of $HIFS earnings from 2023-2025 were mark-to-market gains on its securities portfolio. $HIFS's 13-F indicates that the primary driver of returns has been a large bet on $GOOG, which comprises ~40% of its reported 13-F portfolio. If $GOOG gets a cold, $HIFS gets pneumonia. What could go wrong?
We are short $BW, a stock up ~75% as of this morning on a PR claiming it has a $2.4b deal, but the devil is in the details, or in this case, Santa Monica at the HQ of our old friends $RILY… keep reading because this is every bit the shit show you expect from $RILY… First off, $BW’s counterparty is not $APLD but Base Electron. Base Electron’s address is the EXACT same as $RILY’s, and look who is a director…. Bryant Riley.
Base Electron was formed in December 2025…after $BW announced a limited notice to proceed for a supposed $APLD project in November.
The first sign of trouble is that $BW calls Base Electron a “subsidiary” of $APLD, but this is contradicted by $APLD, who repeatedly says that it is an “independent” company and that it only owns 10% of the equity. Someone has got it wrong here, with think it’s $BW.
Why do we keep saying we don’t think this deal will happen? Well, $APLD itself has given us that idea. If you read its statement carefully, you can see that it neverpromises to use $BW's services in any of its own datacenters. That makes sense because our review of local meetings for their upcoming projects in Louisiana and South Dakota indicates that $APLD will be drawing on grid power for these facilities. It is also inauspicious that the “operational” timeline has shifted from 2028, to late 2028, and now is omitted entirely.
We are short $IONQ because in 2025 they lost funding for Pentagon contracts that had comprised up to 86% of revenues from 2022-2024. This left a $54.6M black hole in their bookings in 2025, which we believe caused their CEO to resign and insiders to dump $396.6 million in stock. The FY 2026 budget passed yesterday indicates $IONQ has missed out on vital Pentagon funding again. But the real shocker is we can reveal the Pentagon never formally requested funding for $IONQ’s contracts, instead the Pentagon was directed to enter these contracts via secretive “backdoor earmarks” by politicians friendly to $IONQ who are now out of power.
$IONQ inflated its bookings in 2024 with $75.6M in Pentagon contracts, but only $21 million was funded at the time. When the new election put this funding in danger did management tell investors? No. The Ex-CEO Chapman resigned effective immediately on Feb 26. The new CEO de Masi canceled bookings altogether by March 5 and started acquiring non-quantum computing businesses to backfill the missing funding ... while selling $104M of his own stock.
$IONQ has primarily backfilled the lost Pentagon $ with low quality non-quantum computing companies. Such as Capella (satellite imagery), Vector Atomics (atomic clocks) and ID Quantique (IDQ), a Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) corp. Apart from costing a fortune, IDQ’s problem is the Pentagon recently directed agencies NOT to use QKD. These acquisitions helped drive cash flow from ops from negative: (-$33M) in Q4 2024 to(-$123.1M) in Q3 2025. Retail gets to hold the bag on this cash bonfire.
We are short $SES because we believe they have announced a series of phantom deals to distract from the loss of their two biggest customers, Honda and Hyundai (who make up ~74% of sales this year), which we believe will happen in a matter of weeks. To patch this massive hole, they have also bought a low-margin China-based UZ energy, whose related entity used a registered agent that had allegedly participated in a $1 billion Ponzi scheme.
Please read the full report and disclaimer linked at bottom of the thread
$SES's first phantom deal was an MOU with AISPEX. This Texas-based retail energy provider was supposed to generate up to $45m. But a former told us this deal was a “complete surprise” and then “they did nothing to fulfill it.” Our site visit shows AISPEX’s headquarters is a shabby little building in Texas sporting signage of another company. The yard is littered with shipping containers that we believe are from the CEO’s covid PPE business.
Another phantom deal was with Data Blanket who was going to make a “significant purchase order,” but, like AISPEX, only was ever mentioned in one SEC filing, the shareholder letter that $SES published three days before announcing a $150m ATM in Feb 2025.
$SES's recently announced joint venture with Texas-based Hisun New Energy Materials Ltd. Co. (Hisun) is also a joke. Hisun’s website depicts a large facility, but it is just a rendering. We conducted due diligence including a site check and believe that Hisun’s Texas footprint is 30 acres of undeveloped swamp, and separately: a residential home and a ford mustang. Hisun’s US entity appears to only have one employee on LinkedIn.
We are short $DVLT, a joke of a company brought to you by a promoter sanctioned by the SEC who has co-authored patents with a convicted felon charged in an elaborate pump-and-dump.
Please read the full report and disclaimer linked at bottom of the thread
$DVLT, a ridiculous company is up ~800% on misleading press releases and what we believe are empty claims about “AI driven data experiences,” “quantum computing,” and Web 3.0 nonsense. But what really gives the game away is an absolutely spectacular cast of top-tier bullshitters tied to this stock, like its CEO Nathaniel Bradley who was fined and settled charges with the SEC along with a convicted felon, Edward Withrow III, originally charged as part of a “pump and dump” scheme.
$DVLT’s NFT platform lists three addresses. One appears to be a beauty salon, another seems to be a co-working space in NY, and the last is an incomplete “headquarters” address in NJ (despite SEC filings saying $DVLT’s headquarters are in OR). Bradley and his spouse Sonia Choi, co-founded Datavault per their company bios and respectively hold the roles of CEO & CMO at DVLT
We are short Datasection (TYO:3905) because we believe Tencent, a designated Chinese Military Company, is their only significant customer. We believe furnishing Tencent or another Chinese company with the most advanced B200 NVIDIA GPUs worth $272m is illegal under US law and contrary to Japan's interests making Datasection’s alignment with Tencent an atrocious scandal. We have already shared our findings with Japanese and US authorities and believe Datasection’s efforts to obtain government funding and subsidies will fail.
We learned from multiple sources that it is common knowledge in the industry that Datasection's mystery customer is China-based. We were told Datasection let the cat out of the bag that Tencent was its backer while it was pursuing financing from Japanese banks, and that the banks quickly shut their doors due to the horrendous reputational risk. We suspect Chinese involvement was also the reason Datasection changed auditors from PwC Japan to a small, relatively unknown auditor.
A former employee told us the CEO initially hid the identity of the mystery customer from his own staff. This former employee believed the CEO used NowNaw Japan (NNJ) to mask Chinese funding. Datasection has denied that NNJ is a related party, but Datasection’s CEO was an original director and promoter for NNJ. The former employee also pointed out that NNJ's Chinese subsidiary, Dalian Shouying Technology Co., Ltd., is based in Tencent's office in China.
We are short $FFAI because we think YT Jia (founder and CEO) has based its latest pump on fake orders, a rebadged Chinese minivan, and a tsunami of lies meant to induce retail to buy right before a massive flood of new shares are authorized. Between dilution, YT’s legal problems (SEC, DOJ, Bankruptcy Court, etc..) and its track record of abysmal failure ($4.4b spent with 17 cars delivered) we think $FFAI will go back to being a penny-stock on its way to delisting.
2/ $FFAI's stock shot up after Nature’s Miracle ($NMHI) announced 1,000 preorders in a deal worth up to $100 million. We think this is fake because $NMHI has almost no money; less than $10,000 in cash and its market cap is ~$2 million. Turns out YT is former classmates with $NMHI CEO Tie (James) Li.
3/ Some of the other B2B preorders for the EV minivan are with “paid co-creation partners.” Former employees revealed to us that each of $FFAI's co-creator deals for its previous vehicle cost them something like a million dollars because they were paying the co-creator to buy the car.