God of Prompt Profile picture
Feb 26 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
“Think step by step.”

That’s outdated.

OpenAI researchers moved beyond it to something called 'Reasoning Scaffolds.'

It forces structured thinking instead of shallow chains.

Works across every major LLM.

Here’s the format you can copy now: Image
First, why "think step by step" fails.

It tells the model to think.

It doesn't tell the model how to think.

You get surface-level reasoning dressed up as depth.

Confident-sounding outputs with zero structural logic underneath. Image
Reasoning Scaffolds fix this by forcing the model through a locked sequence before it answers.

Not "think step by step."

But:

→ Decompose the problem
→ Identify what's known vs. unknown
→ Map dependencies between sub-problems
→ Solve bottom-up
→ Verify against the original question

Every step is required. None are skipped.Image
Here's the actual scaffold format you can copy right now:

"Before answering, work through this sequence:

[DECOMPOSE]: Break the problem into its smallest parts
[KNOWN/UNKNOWN]: What information do I have? What's missing?
[DEPENDENCIES]: Which parts must be solved before others?
[SOLVE]: Work through each part bottom-up
[VERIFY]: Does my answer actually address the original question?

Only then give your final answer."Image
The difference in output quality is not small.

Standard chain-of-thought on complex reasoning tasks: surface pattern matching that sounds logical.

Reasoning Scaffold on the same task: actual dependency mapping, explicit uncertainty, and self-verification.

The model stops pretending to reason and starts actually reasoning.Image
Works on GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok.

Any model with strong instruction following.

The scaffold doesn't rely on model-specific tricks.

It exploits the one thing every frontier LLM has: the ability to follow structured procedures when forced to.
Where this matters most:

→ Complex multi-step math
→ Legal or contract analysis
→ Technical debugging
→ Business strategy with competing tradeoffs
→ Anything where "sounds right" isn't good enough

If the task has real consequences, use a scaffold.
Most people are still writing prompts like it's 2023.

"Be concise." "Think step by step." "You are an expert."

The researchers who actually study this moved on.

Structured scaffolds are what's in the internal docs now.

Copy the format. Use it today. The gap between you and everyone else widens every day you don't.
Your premium AI bundle to 10x your business

→ Prompts for marketing & business
→ Unlimited custom prompts
→ n8n automations
→ Weekly updates

Start your free trial👇
godofprompt.ai/complete-ai-bu…
That's a wrap:

I hope you've found this thread helpful.

Follow me @godofprompt for more.

Like/Repost the quote below if you can:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with God of Prompt

God of Prompt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @godofprompt

Feb 25
Asking AI to "be creative" is the laziest prompt you can write.

And it produces the laziest output.

After 3 years of daily ChatGPT use, I cracked the structure that actually unlocks original, unexpected, usable creative work.

Here's the exact framework 👇 Image
First, understand WHY "be creative" fails.

AI creativity is probabilistic. It defaults to the most statistically common answer.

"Be creative" has no constraints.
No constraints = no creative pressure.
No pressure = average output.

The fix isn't less structure. It's MORE of the right kind.
The 4-part Creative Unlock Structure:

→ FORM: Specify the exact format with one unusual constraint
→ LENS: Give it a specific perspective or voice it wouldn't default to
→ TENSION: Define two opposing forces it must resolve
→ ANTI-PATTERN: Tell it explicitly what it must NOT do

Most people skip all four.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 24
I finally understand why "act as an expert" prompts are destroying your results.

After 200+ tests across Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini I found what actually works.

It's called "Context Stacking" and it doesn't ask the AI to pretend anything.

Here's the technique ↓ Image
When you say "act as a senior developer" the model doesn't think like one.

It writes like one. Big difference.

It pattern-matches to how developers sound in training data.

Not how they actually solve problems.

You get confident-sounding output. Not expert-level thinking. Image
Real experts don't introduce themselves before solving problems.

They bring:

- Prior failures they've already ruled out
- Constraints they're working within
- The actual goal behind the task

So I stopped asking AI to "be" an expert.

I started giving it what an expert already has in their head.Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 21
OpenRouter is the most underrated AI tool on the planet.

You just need one OpenRouter account and this specific "Multi-Chat" setup. I give a single prompt to Claude 4.6, Gemini 3.1, and Grok 4.20, then simply pick the best response. It’s the closest thing to a "God-Mode" for AI productivity.

Steal my setup here:
Here’s the hack:

1. Go to OpenRouter
2. Open a new chat
3. Select multiple models (GPT-5.2, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, whatever you want)
4. Paste ONE single prompt
5. Hit run

Now you get parallel responses from all of them.

Side by side.
Here’s how I personally use it:

→ For research
I compare reasoning depth.

→ For coding
I steal the cleanest implementation.

→ For writing
I merge the most persuasive parts.

→ For strategy
I look for the model that challenges my assumptions.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 20
After 2 years of using Gemini, I can say that it is the technology that has revolutionized my life the most, along with the Internet.

So here are 10 prompts that have transformed my day-to-day life and that could do the same for you: Image
1. Research

Mega prompt:

You are an expert research analyst. I need comprehensive research on [TOPIC].

Please provide:
1. Key findings from the last 12 months
2. Data and statistics with sources
3. Expert opinions and quotes
4. Emerging trends and predictions
5. Controversial viewpoints or debates
6. Practical implications for [INDUSTRY/AUDIENCE]

Format as an executive brief with clear sections. Include source links for all claims.

Additional context: [YOUR SPECIFIC NEEDS]Image
2. Writing white papers

Mega prompt:

You are a technical writer specializing in authoritative white papers.

Write a white paper on [TOPIC] for [TARGET AUDIENCE].

Structure:
- Executive Summary (150 words)
- Problem Statement with market data
- Current Solutions and their limitations
- Our Approach/Solution with technical details
- Case Studies or proof points
- Implementation framework
- ROI Analysis
- Conclusion and Call to Action

Tone: [Authoritative/Conversational/Technical]
Length: [2000-5000 words]

Include:
- Relevant statistics and citations
- Visual placeholders for charts/diagrams
- Quotes from industry experts (mark as [NEEDS VERIFICATION])

Background context: [YOUR COMPANY/PRODUCT INFO]
Read 13 tweets
Feb 19
🚨 R.I.P Harvard MBA.

I built a personal MBA using 12 prompts across Claude and Gemini.

It teaches business strategy, growth tactics, and pricing psychology better than any $200K degree.

Here's every prompt you can copy & paste: Image
1. Business Strategy (Claude)

Prompt:

"Act as a strategy consultant. Analyze my business idea using
Porter's Five Forces. Be brutal. Tell me where I'll die,
not where I'll win. Business idea: [YOURS]" Image
2. Financial Modeling (Gemini)

Prompt:

"Build me a 3-year P&L projection for this business model: [YOURS].
Assume conservative, base, and aggressive scenarios.
Show me which assumptions matter most." Image
Read 17 tweets
Feb 18
Perplexity is terrifyingly good at competitive intelligence.

If you use these 10 prompts, you’ll see why:

(Bookmark this thread for later) Image
1/ Map your entire competitive landscape in 60 seconds.

Prompt:

"Act as a competitive intelligence analyst. Give me a full breakdown of [Company X]'s market position right now — pricing strategy, target customers, key differentiators, and recent strategic moves. Cite sources."

Most people Google this for hours.

Perplexity does it in one shot with live data.
2/ Find exactly where your competitor is losing customers.

Prompt:

"Search recent reviews, Reddit threads, and forums from the last 6 months where users complain about [Competitor]. Summarize the top 5 recurring pain points and frustrations."

This is like reading your competitor's support tickets.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(