Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture
Mar 3 17 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Two recent studies suggest that Long COVID may involve long-term neurobiological remodeling - even after mild infection.
One examined the brain under cognitive load.
The other looked at it at rest.
Together, they point to a persistent shift in network organization!🧵
In the first study (Barnden et al.), the key issue was not where the brain activates -
but how its networks coordinate under mental exertion.
The largest differences appeared during cognitive load.
The regulatory switching system began to fail.
The main systems involved were
the salience network - deciding what matters, and executive control circuits - sustaining performance.
And after repeated cognitive effort, the disruption became more pronounced.
That matches the lived experience
I can manage for a while - then it falls apart.
Now we have another study.
Hedström et al., Scientific Reports 2026.
Patients after mild infection.
No hospitalization.
And on average 32 months post-infection (sic!)
This is no longer early recovery.
This is long-term.
This time, the researchers looked at the brain at rest.
And they found something striking.
Increased connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN).
The DMN is active during internal thought, self-reference, mental simulation -
the brain’s baseline mode.
Patients showed higher intra-network DMN connectivity than controls.
Nearly 3 years after infection.
No structural abnormalities on conventional MRI.
So this is not visible damage.
It is altered network organization.
Interestingly, after a cognitive task, the group difference disappeared.
That could reflect
altered anticipation of task demands
disrupted switching between rest and task modes
or changes in returning to baseline

The authors remain cautious. But the pattern is there.
Barnden showed that under cognitive load, regulatory switching breaks down.
Hedström shows that the resting baseline itself is altered - long term.
These are not contradictions.
They are two sides of the same picture.
The simplest integrated model?
The baseline state is shifted.
And when regulatory demand increases, the switching system cannot compensate.
In other words - the brain starts from a different resting configuration,
and the transition between rest and effort becomes fragile.
What makes this particularly important?
These findings are present nearly three years after a mild infection!
That suggests persistent network remodeling.
Not a transient after-effect.
We are not seeing massive structural destruction.
We are seeing -
reorganization of networks
altered switching dynamics
increased energetic costs
reduced regulatory resilience under load
Even in people who were never hospitalized.
This also fits a broader framework seen in other chronic (!) post-infectious and inflammatory conditions, where regulatory brain networks gradually reorganize under prolonged physiological stress.
Subtle.
But persistent.
What is most concerning is not simply the presence of network differences -
but their persistence.
Nearly three years after a mild infection, the brain’s resting architecture remains measurably altered.
That shifts the conversation.
This is not just about recovery time.
It is about long-term neurobiological remodeling.
@szupraha @ZdravkoOnline @adamvojtech86 @adamkova_vera
Hedström et al., Brain connectivity and its relation to cognitive function in patients with post-COVID-19 condition after mild infection, Scientific Reports 2026. nature.com/articles/s4159…
If these network changes persist nearly three years after mild infection, the key question becomes - what maintains the shift away from baseline?
Across Long COVID biology, proposed drivers include persistent viral antigens or proteins and chronic immune dysregulation.
Ongoing low-grade neuroimmune signaling can alter synaptic efficiency, network synchronization, and energetic balance - especially in regulatory systems like the salience and executive networks.
That makes long-term remodeling biologically plausible.
Similar network-level cognitive patterns are seen in other chronic infections, including HIV-associated neurocognitive syndrom. HAND.
This does not mean the diseases are the same - but it suggests a shared vulnerability of brain control networks under sustained inflammatory stress.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zdenek Vrozina

Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZdenekVrozina

Mar 4
A very interesting 2026 study compares classic ME/CFS, post-COVID ME/CFS like (PCS-CFS), and MS.
It doesn’t just measure antibodies - it tests their functional effects on cells (in vitro).
And the takeaway? Post-COVID does not look identical🧵
Researchers isolated IgG antibodies from patients and exposed endothelial cells to them.
They analyzed mitochondrial structure, cellular energetics, inflammatory cytokines, immune complex proteomics
This allows biological comparison across groups.
Classic ME/CFS
IgG from a subset of patients induced mitochondrial fragmentation and metabolic adaptation.
This resembles chronic cellular stress - not acute energy failure.
Read 13 tweets
Mar 2
In this group of people who self-identified as having Long COVID and were willing to complete an online survey, Long COVID is very long-lasting - around 20 months after symptom onset, only about 5% were fully back to baseline.🧵
The median duration of symptoms was about 20 months.
Only 5% of patients fully recovered.
About 59% never had a symptom-free day.
Most common course patterns
constant symptoms 45%
fluctuating ~27%
relapsing ~10%
Read 17 tweets
Mar 2
This paper is a systematic review summarizing 10 studies focused on cardiovascular findings after COVID.
The main message is - Long COVID is associated with measurable changes in the heart and blood vessels🧵
Systematic review according to PRISMA 2020
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science
1/2020 - 3/2024 (updated 11/2025)
Out of 412 records, 10 high-quality studies were selected.
Subclinical myocardial dysfunction (eg impaired strain/GLS), arrhythmias, endothelial/vascular dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness, occasionally persistent biomarkers (troponin), and newly diagnosed hypertension.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 26
When we talk about COVID in children, we often hear - mild disease.
The real question we rarely ask is this - what if some children leave the infection with a silent, measurable cardiovascular footprint - and we simply don’t have long enough follow-up yet to see what it leads to?🧵
About a quarter of children.
In a new study, 16 out of 67 kids (24%) had subclinical cardiac contractility changes three months after mild or asymptomatic COVID - despite having no persistent symptoms.
The abnormalities were detected only with speckle-tracking strain imaging, a sensitive method that can reveal very subtle myocardial dysfunction.
Read 22 tweets
Feb 25
The interesting proof-of-concept study shows that in some severely immunocompromised people with long-lasting COVID-19, it is possible to use autologous VSTs🧵
It is possible to -
Produce SARS-CoV-2–specific T cells from their own blood (autologous VSTs),
Infuse them back into the patient,
In the 3 treated patients this was temporally associated with clinical improvement, PCR turning negative, and better CT findings - without serious side effects.
How strong is the evidence of effectiveness?
Rather weak to moderate for efficacy, but fairly solid for feasibility and short-term safety. This is an early signal, no control group.
Read 19 tweets
Feb 24
One overlooked signal of the pandemic. IL-32 - a cytokine known from HIV research as a marker of chronic immune activation - is now elevated not only in COVID patients, but across large parts of the general population🧵
Here’s an underappreciated detail. IL-32 isn’t just another inflammatory cytokine. In HIV research, it’s a well-known marker of chronic immune activation - linked to persistent low-grade inflammation and long-term viral persistence
In people with HIV, IL-32 doesn’t simply fight infection. It can also upregulate immunosuppressive pathways (PD-L1 and IDO1), creating an environment where inflammation persists - but effective viral clearance does not.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(