Mothin Ali led an antisemitic campaign against a Rabbi working at Leeds University who had briefly served as a border guard in the IDF after 7/10 which led to his young family having to go into police protection as a result of credible death threats. This is simply fact.
If you think this man was a legitimate target for Mothin Ali’s demonising campaign where he characterised the Rabbi as an “animal” who was an immediate threat to students, you’re part of the escalating violent threat to British Jews. It’s all part of ‘anti Zionist’ antisemitism.
These risks also extend beyond Jews. Lee Rigby was murdered as a result of exactly the same sentiments expressed by Mothin Ali. All those who have served are put at risk if we accept Mothin Ali’s ‘logic’.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Eli Sharabi says because he speaks Arabic he was able to speak to & understand his Hamas captors & one of the more bizarre things about them is their absolute certainty they will follow up the destruction of Israel with conquering the UK & the US. They’re convinced of this.
This is outlandish & ridiculous in some senses but it also speaks to an intent in their organisation & raises questions about their activities. Destroying Israel is outlandish & ridiculous but they are committed to it & engaged in actions to achieve it.
Btw Eli says this in conversation with Haviv Rettig Gur. Here’s the clip. This is the full discussion patreon.com/AskHavivAnythi…
On Bluesky they are freaking out about EHRC advice & never once considering how their response is down to fact they never understood law as it stands because they chose to disdain whole swathes of erudite female equality law professionals in favour of activists who were wrong.
They were told their interpretation of the law wasn’t sound & they would have to campaign for a change in it but they chose to ignore those v experienced female lawyers who told them this & instead ploughed on with persecuting them & anyone woman who dared disagree. I wonder why?
They see bigotry everywhere, especially in any woman who dares to use her voice, but wouldn’t ever dream looking within themselves. Why exactly would you look at women with decades of equality law experience & blithely decide they knew nothing?
Please watch this because it’s genuinely unbelievable. It takes until well over 2 minutes into the report for any reference to be made to Jewishness & at no point is the ethnicity of the 6 million victims made clear by the ITV reporter
Here again, if I was to read this article with little or no prior knowledge of the Holocaust, as increasing numbers do in the 21st century, I would come away thinking it was a generalised desire to kill rather than a specific attempt to exterminate Jews which characterised Nazism
Making it clear Jews were primary object of Nazi genocide & the Holocaust was industrialised slaughter of at least 6 million Jews is incredibly important when surveys around the world show around 60% of the under 40s don’t know the facts & a substantial minority think it a myth.
Those who affect not to understand the difference between using a drug to delay precocious puberty & the risks of delaying puberty beyond ‘normal’ age are either deliberately pretending not to understand or too uncomprehending too have a view worth hearing
Precocious puberty carries serious medical risks such as increased risk of cancer & metabolic disorders. Delaying puberty to ‘normal’ age can help to mitigate against these risks. This is a completely different set of circumstances to delaying puberty well beyond ‘normal’ age.
Case for use of puberty blockers in those suffering from gender dysphoria isn’t even straightforward on its own terms. MtF transition might be aided by preventing features from masculinising but stunted genital growth will also make constructing functional neo-vagina impossible.
Hamas war crimes relating to harm to Palestinian civilians are simply being ignored by ICC & international community. These war crimes were written into law to prevent combatants from using civilians & civilian infrastructure as shields. Ignoring them incentivises use of shields
Writers of international law recognised an aggressor couldn’t simply be allowed to embed themselves in a civilian population to escape attack. There had to be serious censure on those who tried to use civilians as cover for their aggression. Hamas are inexplicably being excused.
This is a worrying juncture. ISIS couldn’t have been fought in Mosul & Raqqa, where there were many civilian casualties as a result of similar but less extreme shielding tactics, if the terrorist group’s crimes had all been blamed on international force tasked with fighting them.
What really gets me is Hamas are meant to administer Gaza, they are trusted by int community in myriad ways inc statistics on casualties & they should have a responsibility for Gazan citizens, yet nowhere will you hear criticism of them from govts or NGOs for failing their people
It’s remarkable. Hamas start a war with incursion into Israel featuring truly unusual barbaric slaughter of civilians & mass kidnap which would demand military response from any country on earth, thus exposing their population to war, yet there are almost no demands of them.
*All* the demands are made of the country they attacked. This Palestinian leadership isn’t even expected to cover the basics for its civilian population. It steals their food & hides underneath them rendering them targets *in international law* & almost no-one says a thing.