Sayer Ji Profile picture
Mar 4 9 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/🚨BREAKING: The day after Congress summoned Bill Gates to testify about Epstein, a newly surfaced DOJ document shows Epstein describing joint MIT funding with Gates — and calling it "Deception."

This is the thread Congress needs to see. 🧵👇 Image
Image
2/ THE DOCUMENT

Document: EEFTA01957950 Date: September 15, 2013 From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Barnaby Marsh

"I will do some funding at MIT with gates. Deception signals. want to join"

This is not allegation. This is Epstein's own words — in a federal DOJ production.

📎 EFTA01957950 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3/ THE CONGRESSIONAL CONNECTION

🏛️ On March 3, 2026 — yesterday — House Oversight Chairman James Comer summoned Gates to a transcribed interview on May 19, 2026.

The Committee's mandate includes investigating how Epstein "curried favor and exercised influence to protect his illegal activities."

This document is Exhibit A.

🔗 House Oversight: oversight.house.gov
🔗 Comer's announcement on X: x.com/RepJamesComer/…Image
4/ THE MIT ANONYMOUS DONATION SCANDAL

🎓 Why does "Deception" land so hard?

Because MIT was caught deliberately hiding Epstein's donations as "anonymous" — even internally — after his 2008 sex offender conviction.

@NewYorker / Ronan Farrow broke this in 2019. MIT's own review confirmed it.

Epstein apparently had a word for that strategy.

🔗 Link: newyorker.com/news/news-desk…Image
5/ WHO IS BARNABY MARSH?

🔬 Epstein sent this email to Barnaby Marsh — an Oxford-trained evolutionary biologist and longtime Epstein intellectual collaborator.

"Deception signals" is a real concept in his academic field — signaling theory.

But Epstein wasn't writing a dissertation. He was building a co-funding coalition. At MIT. With Gates.Image
6/ THE GATES DENIAL PROBLEM

⚠️ Gates has long minimized his Epstein ties as regrettable but limited "philanthropic" meetings.
But the public record tells a different story:

▪️ Multiple post-conviction meetings (NYT, 2019)
▪️ Explored a ~$2B fund with Epstein
▪️ Now: a 2013 email showing joint MIT funding described as "deception"

🔗 Link: nytimes.com/2019/10/12/bus…
7/ THE FIVE PRONGS

📋 House Oversight is investigating five things. This document speaks to at least two:

(iv) How Epstein "curried favor... to protect illegal activities" ← Direct hit

(i) Mismanagement of the federal investigation ← Why was this not surfaced sooner?

The document came from the DOJ's own EFTA production. It was always there.Image
8/ DIVE DEEPER

🔍 I've been reading the Epstein Files, with hundreds of hours of investigation, so you don't have.

This is only one element of my ongoing investigation — tracking the full architecture of Epstein's influence networks through primary federal documents.

Read my Full Investigative Series: sayerji.substack.com/t/epstein-files

The May 19 hearing just got a lot more interesting.Image
9/ CALL TO ACTION

⚖️ The question is no longer whether Gates and Epstein co-funded MIT.

Epstein said they did. In writing. In a federal document.
The question Congress must now answer:

What did that funding purchase — and who knew it was designed to deceive?

🔁 Share if you believe the public deserves the full picture. And tag other leaders who need to know this information. @RepThomasMassie @RepNancyMace @RepJamesComer @GOPoversight @mtgreenee @RepRoKhanna

New to my work? Follow me on my other platforms and social accounts: campsite.bio/sayerji

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sayer Ji

Sayer Ji Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sayerjigmi

Mar 5
1/🚨 BREAKING: Email Describes $100M/Year Proposal to Epstein Attributed to Bill Gates

In May 2013, Boris Nikolic — Bill Gates's science advisor — sent Jeffrey Epstein this message:

"Bill is anxiously awaiting your answer."

The offer on the table: $100 million per year. For 30% of Epstein's time.

This is in the documents. Here's what they show — and what they don't.🧵👇Image
2/ The full Nikolic email reads:

"He feels that 100 million per year for no more than 30 percent of your time is fair for the first three years. There will most likely be bonuses."

Nine figures. Annual. With performance bonuses.

This is not the language of social contact.

📎 EFTA00960138 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3/ Then this line:

"The purchase of the algorithm for the foundation is another matter."

A separate transaction. The acquisition of something called "the algorithm." For the Gates Foundation.

📎 EFTA00960138 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 5
1/🚨Two days ago, Congress summoned Bill Gates to testify under oath on May 19, 2026.

Chairman Comer's letter to Gates identifies five areas of inquiry — including how Epstein and Maxwell "sought to curry favor and exercise influence to protect their illegal activities."

The federal court record already answers that question.

Here is what Gates will need to answer for when he does. 🧵👇Image
Image
2/📄The Document That Changes Everything

Gates didn't just meet Epstein.

He signed a formal legal agreement releasing Epstein's offshore entities from all past and future liability.

Then thanked him — emphatically — for advice to minimize documents.

Then confirmed a multimillion-dollar financial deal to him in writing.

It's all in the federal court record.

EFTA01106142 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
EFTA01756693 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
EFTA00649520 justice.gov/epstein/files/…
3/ August 8, 2013 — The Legal Agreement⚖️

A six-page agreement was addressed to William H. Gates at his bgc3 offices in Kirkland, WA.

The document states that Gates had specifically requested that Epstein — a registered sex offender — serve as Boris Nikolic's representative in all negotiations.

This was Gates' initiative.

What he authorized Epstein to access: any and all confidential information of the Gates Foundation and Melinda F. Gates personally — at Epstein's own discretion.

The agreement included a survival clause. These provisions were designed to bind Gates' estate and heirs after his death.

Gates gave a convicted sex offender authorized access to his wife's personal information — structured to outlast his own life.

EFTA01106142
justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 4
1/🚨Jeffrey Epstein built a leverage file on Bill Gates.

It contained allegations about an STD. A request to secretly medicate Melinda without her consent. Gates' personal plea to destroy the emails.

Four days after delivering that intelligence, Epstein received a multimillion-dollar financial agreement from Gates. Three weeks later, Gates signed documents giving Epstein unlimited authorized access to all confidential information on Melinda Gates personally.

Then thanked him for advice to "minimize documents."

You can draw your own conclusions.

It's all in the federal court record. Gates testifies under oath May 19. 🧵👇Image
2/ The intelligence acquisition To understand the leverage, you need to understand how Epstein built it.

He didn't hack Gates. He didn't surveil him.

He recruited Gates' most trusted insider — chief science adviser Boris Nikolic — who handed Epstein everything.

Including material Gates thought was protected by attorney-client privilege.

It wasn't. Epstein wasn't a lawyer. He wrote that privilege claim himself.

(EFTA01967982) justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3/ The file gets built

Aug 25, 2013. Epstein to Boris: "What entity gave you the 500k."

Boris replied from his phone with:

▪️A $500K payment from Gates' personal bank account
▪️A concealed investment partnership called Eclipse funding a woman Melinda knew nothing about
▪️Wire transfer documentation Boris had at home
▪️His assessment: "She would be much more furious than on anything before if she finds out."

(EFTA01755865) justice.gov/epstein/files/…

📷 Image: Typeset card of Boris's key sentences with EFTA numberImage
Read 9 tweets
Mar 3
1/ 🧵BREAKING: Previously unreported federal Epstein file emails reveal that Jeffrey Epstein claimed he personally killed cold fusion — the discovery that could have given the world clean, limitless energy from water.

Not through science. Through congressional defunding and a meeting with the head of the Mormon Church.

It's in the federal record. EFTA02437662. Previously unreported. Full story 👇Image
Image
2/ October 1, 2009. One year after his sex offense conviction. Epstein writes to associate Al Seckel:
"regarding cold fusion. i killed pons years ago"

Seckel presses: "How did you kill him?"

Epstein's answer names a specific congressman, a specific funding fight, and the head of the Mormon Church.

EFTA02437662 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
3/ Epstein described lobbying Congress against the funding for Pons's research at the University of Utah, naming Rep. Wayne Owens (D-UT) and claiming he met with LDS Church leadership — because BYU's competing cold fusion program ran through the Church's governance.

This wasn't peer review. It was political assassination of a scientific career by a private citizen with no scientific credentials.

EFTA00740161 justice.gov/epstein/files/…Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 2
1/🚨On Feb 27, 2026, the WHO chose 3 influenza strains for next season’s vaccine.

Three strains.
Locked in months ahead.
For a respiratory ecosystem of 200+ circulating viruses.

This isn’t precision medicine.

It’s a multi-billion-dollar global strategy built on predictions the evidence increasingly calls into question.🧵👇Image
2/ Cochrane (the gold standard in evidence reviews) analyzed 52 trials, 80,000+ adults.

Result?

71 people must be vaccinated to prevent one confirmed flu case.

Little or no effect on hospitalizations.

That’s not a strong foundation for mass policy. 📉

📎 Cochrane Review (Demicheli et al., 2018) cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…Image
3/ For adults 65+?

40 years of data.
75 studies.

Conclusion: Evidence quality is poor and provides no clear guidance on safety or effectiveness.

Yet this is the group most aggressively targeted.

📎 Cochrane Review (Demicheli et al., 2018) cochrane.org/evidence/CD004…Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 1
1/💊In February 2025, a massive Swedish national cohort study was published — and it STILL isn't getting the attention it deserves.

Antidepressants, especially SSRIs, were linked to FASTER cognitive decline, increased fractures, and earlier death in dementia patients.

Here's what you need to know 🧵↓Image
Image
2/9
The numbers are stark:

◾ Escitalopram → steepest annual cognitive decline (−0.76 MMSE points/yr)
◾ Higher SSRI doses → 35% increased risk of severe dementia
◾ 25% increased fracture risk
◾ 18% increased mortality

This wasn't a small survey. It was one of the most rigorous studies of its kind.
3/9
And yet — a year later, these drugs are STILL prescribed based on the "chemical imbalance" theory of depression.

A theory that even mainstream psychiatry is quietly walking away from.

There is no convincing evidence that low serotonin causes depression. The foundation is broken.

🔗Dive deeper: greenmedinfo.com/blog/depressio…Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(