1/🚨BREAKING: The day after Congress summoned Bill Gates to testify about Epstein, a newly surfaced DOJ document shows Epstein describing joint MIT funding with Gates — and calling it "Deception."
This is the thread Congress needs to see. 🧵👇
2/ THE DOCUMENT
Document: EEFTA01957950 Date: September 15, 2013 From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Barnaby Marsh
"I will do some funding at MIT with gates. Deception signals. want to join"
This is not allegation. This is Epstein's own words — in a federal DOJ production.
🔬 Epstein sent this email to Barnaby Marsh — an Oxford-trained evolutionary biologist and longtime Epstein intellectual collaborator.
"Deception signals" is a real concept in his academic field — signaling theory.
But Epstein wasn't writing a dissertation. He was building a co-funding coalition. At MIT. With Gates.
6/ THE GATES DENIAL PROBLEM
⚠️ Gates has long minimized his Epstein ties as regrettable but limited "philanthropic" meetings.
But the public record tells a different story:
▪️ Multiple post-conviction meetings (NYT, 2019)
▪️ Explored a ~$2B fund with Epstein
▪️ Now: a 2013 email showing joint MIT funding described as "deception"
📋 House Oversight is investigating five things. This document speaks to at least two:
(iv) How Epstein "curried favor... to protect illegal activities" ← Direct hit
(i) Mismanagement of the federal investigation ← Why was this not surfaced sooner?
The document came from the DOJ's own EFTA production. It was always there.
8/ DIVE DEEPER
🔍 I've been reading the Epstein Files, with hundreds of hours of investigation, so you don't have.
This is only one element of my ongoing investigation — tracking the full architecture of Epstein's influence networks through primary federal documents.
The May 19 hearing just got a lot more interesting.
9/ CALL TO ACTION
⚖️ The question is no longer whether Gates and Epstein co-funded MIT.
Epstein said they did. In writing. In a federal document.
The question Congress must now answer:
What did that funding purchase — and who knew it was designed to deceive?
🔁 Share if you believe the public deserves the full picture. And tag other leaders who need to know this information. @RepThomasMassie @RepNancyMace @RepJamesComer @GOPoversight @mtgreenee @RepRoKhanna
New to my work? Follow me on my other platforms and social accounts: campsite.bio/sayerji
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/🚨Two days ago, Congress summoned Bill Gates to testify under oath on May 19, 2026.
Chairman Comer's letter to Gates identifies five areas of inquiry — including how Epstein and Maxwell "sought to curry favor and exercise influence to protect their illegal activities."
The federal court record already answers that question.
Here is what Gates will need to answer for when he does. 🧵👇
2/📄The Document That Changes Everything
Gates didn't just meet Epstein.
He signed a formal legal agreement releasing Epstein's offshore entities from all past and future liability.
Then thanked him — emphatically — for advice to minimize documents.
Then confirmed a multimillion-dollar financial deal to him in writing.
A six-page agreement was addressed to William H. Gates at his bgc3 offices in Kirkland, WA.
The document states that Gates had specifically requested that Epstein — a registered sex offender — serve as Boris Nikolic's representative in all negotiations.
This was Gates' initiative.
What he authorized Epstein to access: any and all confidential information of the Gates Foundation and Melinda F. Gates personally — at Epstein's own discretion.
The agreement included a survival clause. These provisions were designed to bind Gates' estate and heirs after his death.
Gates gave a convicted sex offender authorized access to his wife's personal information — structured to outlast his own life.
1/🚨Jeffrey Epstein built a leverage file on Bill Gates.
It contained allegations about an STD. A request to secretly medicate Melinda without her consent. Gates' personal plea to destroy the emails.
Four days after delivering that intelligence, Epstein received a multimillion-dollar financial agreement from Gates. Three weeks later, Gates signed documents giving Epstein unlimited authorized access to all confidential information on Melinda Gates personally.
Then thanked him for advice to "minimize documents."
You can draw your own conclusions.
It's all in the federal court record. Gates testifies under oath May 19. 🧵👇
2/ The intelligence acquisition To understand the leverage, you need to understand how Epstein built it.
He didn't hack Gates. He didn't surveil him.
He recruited Gates' most trusted insider — chief science adviser Boris Nikolic — who handed Epstein everything.
Including material Gates thought was protected by attorney-client privilege.
It wasn't. Epstein wasn't a lawyer. He wrote that privilege claim himself.
Aug 25, 2013. Epstein to Boris: "What entity gave you the 500k."
Boris replied from his phone with:
▪️A $500K payment from Gates' personal bank account
▪️A concealed investment partnership called Eclipse funding a woman Melinda knew nothing about
▪️Wire transfer documentation Boris had at home
▪️His assessment: "She would be much more furious than on anything before if she finds out."
1/ 🧵BREAKING: Previously unreported federal Epstein file emails reveal that Jeffrey Epstein claimed he personally killed cold fusion — the discovery that could have given the world clean, limitless energy from water.
Not through science. Through congressional defunding and a meeting with the head of the Mormon Church.
It's in the federal record. EFTA02437662. Previously unreported. Full story 👇
2/ October 1, 2009. One year after his sex offense conviction. Epstein writes to associate Al Seckel:
"regarding cold fusion. i killed pons years ago"
Seckel presses: "How did you kill him?"
Epstein's answer names a specific congressman, a specific funding fight, and the head of the Mormon Church.
3/ Epstein described lobbying Congress against the funding for Pons's research at the University of Utah, naming Rep. Wayne Owens (D-UT) and claiming he met with LDS Church leadership — because BYU's competing cold fusion program ran through the Church's governance.
This wasn't peer review. It was political assassination of a scientific career by a private citizen with no scientific credentials.