Frontotemporal dementia attacks the frontal lobes. The brain’s command center for judgment, empathy, impulse control, moral reasoning and long-term planning.
Imagine a world leader whose frontal lobes progressively fail, but no one intervenes.
Or worse, they cheer it on.
As FTD progresses, disinhibition dominates.
The leader may issue impulsive orders, make erratic public statements or flout norms & laws.
Even in those who were previously unmalicious, there would be a genuine neurological inability to foresee consequences.
Empathy erodes.
Decisions that would once horrify a morally intact leader; targeting vulnerable populations, ignoring human suffering, prioritising personal gain over collective safety etc start to feel trivial.
Imagine this in a leader who wasn’t morally intact to begin with.
Judgment collapses.
Strategic foresight, risk assessment, ethical reasoning and tactical nous are replaced with short-term, self-referential thinking.
Allies will soon be alienated, enemies emboldened, and crises mismanaged.
FTD often induces compulsive behaviours.
Obsession with trivialities, repetitive announcements, rigid black or white thinking, and fixation on symbolic victories over substantive problems.
Everything becomes increasingly theatrical.
Language may falter.
In some FTD variants, speech becomes tangential, overconfident, belligerent, or socially tone-deaf.
Messages are delivered with conviction, masking the cognitive disintegration beneath.
This can give the dangerous illusion of competence.
Moral reasoning flattens.
Nuanced ethical distinctions fade.
Complex dilemmas are simplified into win/lose or me/others scenarios, making destructive or unethical policies more likely to pass unchallenged.
If those who should challenge fear challenging, a dark mess unfolds.
Left unchecked, these cognitive and emotional deficits cascade.
Disinhibition combined with a lack of empathy, poor judgment and moral flattening inevitably leads to decision making that increasingly imperils not only the nation they rule, but global stability.
Institutions & advisors exist to mitigate human error.
FTD in leadership illustrates why cognitive health isn’t simply a private matter, it’s a societal one.
Checks on power are essential precisely because human brains fail. Are sufficient checks in place currently? I’d say not
Brilliance or charisma, if they ever existed in the first place, cannot compensate for frontal lobe dysfunction.
Without intervention, cognitive decline in leadership has direct, measurable consequences on policy, conflict, and most importantly, human lives.
Imagine a world leader who cannot resist impulsivity, cannot weigh moral cost, cannot foresee consequences, and cannot plan beyond immediate desires.
Every crisis inescapably becomes a mirror of their brain’s deficits; chaotic, destructive, impulsive, irrational, amoral.
FTD doesn’t erase history, but it erodes the ability to learn from it. Past mistakes barely even register, ultimately becoming irrelevant.
The leader drifts further from reality & so too do the people who rely on their judgment. Especially for those who hang on his every word.
In short, unchecked frontal lobe degeneration in leadership is not just a clinical problem, it is a seriously gargantuan geopolitical risk.
Cognitive decline in power, especially when invisible, or unchallenged (as it is here), can ripple across nations & generations.
Society assumes competence in its leaders (Trump an exception to this rule).
But FTD shatters that assumption quietly at first, then catastrophically. It is insidious by nature.
Vigilance, accountability, and structural checks exist precisely because the human brain is fallible
This process is unfolding in someone with control over armies, nuclear weapons, economic systems, and international diplomacy
The neurological degeneration of a few cubic centimeters of cortex has already become a global risk factor.
And it will continue to worsen.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reduced prefrontal cortical function, whether from injury, aging or temp impairment, is associated with decreased critical evaluation, increased impulsivity & greater reliance on emotionally salient narratives, which can increase vulnerability to manipulation & propaganda.
A society’s resistance to propaganda depends on the cognitive health of its population.
If executive function declines at scale, you end up with worse decisions on an individual basis, and weaker collective judgment.
And SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that corrodes executive function.
We need to have serious conversations about what COVID is doing to people’s brains, minds, behaviour & personalities.
But it is impossible to do so when people either refuse to acknowledge reality, or those who do acknowledge it tell us we can’t discuss it because it’s “ableist”
Throwing around accusations of ableism is a smokescreen. A way to avoid confronting how a mass-infecting, brain-damaging virus may be reshaping behaviour at scale.
Studies have found post-COVID changes in brain metabolism, grey matter, attention & emotional processing. FACT.
If a virus impairs the neural circuits responsible for empathy, inhibition & moral judgment, society as a whole becomes more susceptible to extremism, selfishness, cruelty & authoritarian propaganda.
If you found out a music concert was going to secretly release a noxious gas to subtly harm the attendees, would you just don a gas mask & attend anyway? You’d be safe. They wouldn’t.
Would this impact your enjoyment? Or would you feel uneasy being surrounded by potential harm?
Attending a crowded indoor event masked is like joining an event secretly exposing everyone else to a mild toxin.
You may be safe, but you’re legitimising harm.
These events spike community infections, making hospitals, children, and vulnerable people more at risk.
Claiming to take COVID seriously, while partaking in such events is blatant hypocrisy.
Masking doesn’t absolve you of the consequences you help create. Children, the immunocompromised, and your community still pay the price of these super spreader events.