In 2015, Twitter was "the free speech wing of the free speech party" according to CEO Jack Dorsey, even avoiding collaboration with the NSA (unlike Google, Facebook). By 2019 it was one of the most censored, monitored, and controlled social media networks in the world.
YouTube was the biggest and most monetizable platform, Reddit the most important discussion forum, Amazon needed for authors and websites, and Google Search the only way to surface niche info sources. Twitter mattered as the social network of the intelligentsia.
In 2015, Twitter under Twitter general counsel Vijaya Gadde began reinterpreting their existing rules much more broadly and banned hate speech, to "keep Twitter safe." Chuck Johnson was banned for tweeting that would "take out" (attack digitally, not murder) a BLM activist.
Twitter's informal stance had already started changing, but the big formal changes to the rules began in 2016, when it no longer promised not to censor user content that didn't break the rules ("limited circumstances described below").
In February 2016, Twitter established its (in)famous "Trust and Safety" council, a body which networked censorship/moderation/activist expertise around the world to inform Twitter policy.
In 2017, Twitter formally moved against "hate symbols" and "unwanted sexual advances." The blue check aristocracy began to take form too, with Rose McGowan's followers impelling this change (on her behalf) after she was temporarily locked for posting someone's private number.
In 2018, Twitter banned "misgendering" transsexuals, and laid out which groups got special protection ("women, people of color, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual individuals, and marginalized and historically underrepresented communities").
Twitter also began shadowbanning prominent Republican politicians in 2018, though they later claimed this was a bug and backtracked when Republicans attacked them for it.
High profile bans included Milo Yiannopoulos (338,000 followers, July 2016), major Trump advisor Roger Stone (October 2017), Gavin McInnes and the Proud Boys (August 2018), Alex Jones (coordinated with other platforms, Sept 2018), Laura Loomer (265,000 followers, Nov 2018).
In the first half of 2018, Twitter actioned 250,806 accounts for hateful conduct. This increased by 54% by the second half of 2019.
Some revelations from the Twitter files: 1) The FBI had a dedicated task force of 80 agents and a one-way communication channel called teleporter to flag posts, even joke posts from tiny accounts
2) All of the conspiracies about shadowbans were totally vindicated; Twitter had separate lists for Trends blacklists, Search blacklists, and "Do Not Amplify" (which included Charlie Kirk), with multiple levels of visibility filtering and internal bodies to administer them
I have deliberately avoided getting into the 2020-2022 intensification of censorship/narrative control (eg putting notes on Trump's posts and banning him, Hunter Biden's laptop, everything related to COVID, lab leak, and the lockdowns).
Alaric on 2010s feminism and sexual norms. He sees it as a concrete, sharp break in 2014 alien to anything that came before. which almost overnight made anti-male sentiment the most pervasive cultural force in the Western world.
2014 saw a huge top-down feminist media campaign both motivating and caused by government initiatives and international institutions. This was the true start of Woke as a feminist and internationalist movement, before it became more racialist and parochial.
2014 redefined consent and made rape and street harassment, low and falling for decades in the American mainstream, centerpieces of American social consciousness.
Another thread on the closure of the Internet. Amazon, like other major tech giants, had little content policy beyond "no illegal content, spam or scams/fraud" in 2015 and by 2020 had a well developed censorship infrastructure for both the web store and AWS.
Amazon is particularly important for two reasons: (1) AWS making it, like Google Search, a major Internet chokepoint and (2) 50% book and 80% e-book market share; Amazon banning a book is the closest a non-classified book can really come to being banned in the US.
The first cracks in Amazon's neutrality appeared in June 2015, when a media blitz and political pressure campaign (sparked by Dylan Roof) led to Amazon removing all Confederate flag (a completely normal American symbol) merchandise from the site.
WIRED: Silicon Valley gay networks are so influential because gays are "cross-generational" allowing settings where "established wealth meets emerging talent."
Gays run Silicon Valley, lesbians and fat people hardest hit.
There is a common Hollywood upwards mobility narrative for early 20th century European immigrants. It's not really true; for most origins earnings for both first and second generation were similar and were already above average in generation 1.
Relative rank order didn't change much either.
I know you might be wondering "why are Italians so high and Norwegians, Swedes, etc so low." Answer: farms.
More on the 2016-2019 closure of the Internet. In 2015, Reddit, like YouTube, had almost no content policy beyond banning illegal activity, doxxing, harassment, and involuntary or underage pornography. By 2020, Reddit had purged political dissent from the site.
Much of Reddit's shift was motivated by one thing: that r/The_Donald, the hub of internet Trump support, could consistently reach and dominate the front page. Reddit repeatedly changed their algorithm and policies specifically to suppress r/The_Donald before banning it.
The first major crack in Reddit's freedom of speech stance was in 2016, when the CEO of Reddit, Steve Huffman, was caught personally editing user's posts on r/The_Donald. He then changed Reddit's policy to exclude r/The_Donald from the r/popular Reddit homepage.
The most important platform to be closed off 2017-2019 was YouTube. Before 2017, YouTube was a very open platform, with easy monetization and almost no moderation of legal content. By the end of 2019, thoughtcrime (anything to the right of Ben Shapiro) was thoroughly purged.
In March 2017, several news organizations (The Times of London, the Guardian, WSJ) published coordinated articles about ads appearing next to "problematic" content on YouTube. This led to the British government summoning Google to explain and an advertiser boycott.
[as an aside, no one sane believes that an ad appearing next to a YouTube video implies the company behind that ad endorses or knows about the content of the video; this was 100% astroturf. No one knew or complained until the news articles hit]