New deep dive: "Octopus Smoke and Mirrors" exposes what's really going on behind the hype at Octopus, the UK's biggest energy supplier. Spoiler: a lot of valuation puffery, restated accounts and marketing flim-flam. A thread (1/10)
Recap: Last year I asked if we'd hit "Peak Pink Octopus" after news of spinning off Kraken (their tech platform) at £10bn, valuing the whole group at £15bn. It smelled like hype before a sale which was borne out by the actual valuation of ~£6.7bn. (2/10)
Now the latest FY2025 accounts for Octopus Energy Group Limited show it fell into losses again. Investors were not on hand to provide more funding. Instead they sought to monetise their investment by demerging Kraken (3/10)
Despite the demerger hype, Kraken fell into losses in a shortened FY2025 and they restated their 2024 accounts. This creates more than a little smoke and mirrors around the group's true value (4/10)
The main energy supply business is profitable, but they also restated their 2024 accounts in the latest submission. Octopus Energy is also apparently falling short of Ofgem’s Capital Target even though it now meets the less rigorous capital floor (5/10)
The EV business has restated its accounts again, but is still losing money and the negative asset position got even wider in FY2025. It turns out that providing “everything you need to switch to cheaper, greener electric driving” isn’t profitable (6/10)
Other subsidiaries are making losses and even Octopus Energy Generation that manages green energy investments is losing money despite claiming to be "transforming the world of renewables generation". It costs money to help investors lose money. (7/10)
CEO @g__j has made claims that renewables are cheapest but was contradicted by staff who told the ESNZ Sel. Comm. that electricity prices will be 20% higher even if wholesale prices halve, which can only be driven by the on-costs of renewables (8/10)
Separating Kraken and restating accounts will not address the underlying problems at @OctopusEnergy. The group's valuation games and restating of accounts suggest they will need more than smoke and mirrors to stem the losses (9/10)
@OctopusEnergy If you enjoyed this thread, please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article on the link below (10/10) open.substack.com/pub/davidturve…
@OctopusEnergy Hi @threadreaderapp unroll please.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨New article alert: "Net Zero is the Road to Serfdom" – UK’s rush to Net Zero is futile virtue signalling, hiking energy costs, and tanking the economy. Inspired by Hayek's warnings on central planning, we’re on the Road to Serfdom. A thread (1/11) #NetZero #UKEnergy
Labour MPs boast about "secure" renewables & wind power, while Starmer signs us up to stricter EU Net Zero rules. But govt control of energy is leading to energy austerity & poor economic performance. How far down the road to serfdom are we? (2/11)
Energy Prices: UK industrial electricity tops the developed world at 26.63p/kWh – 3.5x Canada's cheapest. Domestic prices 2.4x US levels. Gas fares better but still 6x Canada for industry. Nothing to brag about – it's crippling us! (3/11)
There's a lot going on today, but nevertheless it's important to understand what happened in the latest Ofgem price cap. Labour's fairground shell game of shuffling of subsidy costs cannot hide the increasing costs of renewables. A thread 🧵(1/n)
First up, Labour promised a £300 cut in bills at the election. They also claimed they would reduce bills by £150 in April, but the reality is a reduction of just £117. So both Labour's promises were lies (2/n)
We can see in the detail that wholesale gas and electricity prices fell in the latest price cap. This led to q cut of about £19 in direct fuel costs for electricity and £44 for gas (3/n)
The productivity of the electricity generation sector has halved since generation peaked in 2005. Renewables are dragging us over the energy cliff. A thread (1/n)
Over the past few weeks the government has released the results of the AR7 and AR7a renewables auctions and celebrated the creation of up to 17,000 jobs. But more jobs in electricity generation is not a goodie thing - akin to digging holes and filling them in again (2/n)
Looked at in terms of Gross Value Added (GVA), electricity generation productivity looks superficially good. Even though hours worked has soared, GVA/hour has gone up. But this is only tracking high energy prices (3/n)
The results of the AR7a renewables auction expose government lies about the cost of renewables and net zero. A thread 🧵(1/n) (link to full article in bio)
AR7a awarded contracts for 4.9GW of new solar at a clearing price of £68/MWh (in 2025 prices), 1.3GW of onshore wind at £75/MWh and a further 21MW of tidal stream capacity. (2/n)
Superficially it looks cheap, leading @Ed_Miliband to claim new onshore wind & solar are 50% cheaper than gas & he is lowering bills. But his claims are based on lies (3/n)
One failed turbine at Scroby Sands exposes the scale of the cost of decommissioning offshore wind farms. And there’s precious little cash being set aside to cover it. A thread (1/n)
Scroby Sands is a relatively small 60MW offshore windfarm. In 2023 one of the 30 turbines caught fire and owner RWE has decided to decommission that single turbine (2/n)
In the accounts up to end 2024, we can see the wind farm is losing money, with pre-tax losses of £4.7m, despite earning ROC subsidies worth £9.8m, or nearly 48% of revenue (3/n)
The data is in, so now we know how much the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) scheme cost us in 2024/25. A thread 🧵(1/n)
First, overall generation under the scheme was down on the year at just under 8TWh. It is beginning to look like a downtrend has been in place since 2020/21 (2/n)
The total cost of the scheme fell slightly too to £1.84bn (3/n)